Skip to main content

DLCC rental revoke

255 Comments

G
Geana Schwartz
9 years ago

There is not one humanitarian common sense reason to take this property away from these citizens. If the city council is truly about the people of this town they will not take these people's homes.

C
Char Ellis
9 years ago

This upsets me, can't do this to a elderly woman.

A
Annie Sisson
9 years ago

This is ridiculous...

T
Tara solem
9 years ago

The city council made decisions based on their own self interest. That is not their role. They should do what's best for the city- NOT themselves

T
Toni Schantz
9 years ago

This is disgusting!!

S
Stephanie Schmit
9 years ago

This is TERRIBLE! Shame on you, Detroit Lakes City Council!!

K
Kathy Kinsella
9 years ago

Let this man keep his dog and home!! He served our country & has had major surgery. Have a heart!!!

M
Mary Schnoor
9 years ago

Don't leave my brother homeless!!!!!

A
Angei Koltes
9 years ago

A little compassion goes a long way. The city council should try using it. Thus us ridiculous

C
Corrine Vange
9 years ago

We need more affordable one bedroom apartments in Detroit Lakes that allow for a pet. Not everyone has a good paying job or a two household income.

F
Fay Mosny
9 years ago

You can't throw out a veteran and his dog! The landlord is also on a fixed income. If she looses her renter she may also loose her house. So wrong in so many ways!

C
Christina Stewart
9 years ago

Its just wrong

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Low

T
Troy greenwaldt
9 years ago

Stop being a bag of dicks!

J
Justin vigesaa
9 years ago Featured

My dad lives here and i helped put alot of time and effort in fixing alot of this house up for him it is pleanty livable and plan to fix more as long as hes granted to stay hes on a fixed income with a dog and is a veteran dont know how could throw him out

J
Jena Ortiz
9 years ago

Do the right thing people!!! Please share

C
Cathy Zakrzewski
9 years ago

Please help this Disabled Veteran.

B
Bridget Nickolauson
9 years ago

I think that this woman should be grandfathered in, as long as she is living at that city address, and the matter can be reassessed at the time of her vacancy of the property.

S
Sandy Wipper
9 years ago

Please help

A
Andrew Hamlin
9 years ago

It should be grandfather in