BCBA's Supervision by C. Psychologists in the Delivery of the DFO Services in the New OAP
To the attention of:
Michael Nicin , Senior Policy Advisor at Office of the Minister of Children and Youth Services
Michael Coteau, Minister of Children and Youth Services
Bruce McIntosh, President of the Ontario Autism Coalition and member of the OAP Implementation Committee
Dear Mr. Nicin:
Please re-instate/not remove the requirement for an RHP (clinical psychologist) overseer to the BCBA providing ABA therapy to children receiving DFO. The quality of the services received will suffer if this is not the case. The accountability and expertise provided by the RHP is essential and will ensure the DFO funds are spent to achieve the best possible outcome for children receiving DFO with the delivery of quality services.
I have significant concerns about the removal of the requirement of an RHP as clinician in charge overseer for BCBA's in this OAP.
I feel strongly that the expertise of a clinical psychologist (an RHP) is critical for not only accountability and quality in service delivery but also for breadth and depth of knowledge of child and human development, co-morbid disorders and other psychological issues that are beyond the scope of expertise possessed by a BCBA. I want the BCBA to have an overseer to turn to for guidance and problem solve as well as that third tier of accountability for ensuring that the programs implemented were all consistently clinically sound and appropriate. I know that that this clinical overseer will enhance the quality of therapy that my child will receive in the OAP.
The level of knowledge, expertise and experience is widely variable across the BCBA designation. It is the presence of the clinical psychologist (RHP) as the clinician in charge that contributes to and ensures the quality assurance and continuity. Having this overseer also ensures a clinical accountability from the BCBA to the clinical psychologist and safeguards quality service delivery and clinical guidelines being adhered to.
I have great concerns with removing the requirement of this clinician in charge being an RHP to oversee the service delivery. I am concerned that the removal of this contingency will affect the quality of the services provided to children as well as consistent clinically appropriate and competent ABA therapy.
I believe that newly board certified behaviour analysts especially require the oversight of an RHP with a BCBA designation right out of school. I believe it is ill-advised to remove this guidance, support and expertise that the RHP clinician in charge would provide.
A two-year masters program and 1500 hours of practicum and passing a board exam do not qualify an individual to have the clinical judgement and expertise of a clinical psychologist nor the clinical accountability of an RHP.
I worry that in the pursuit to gain more credibility and establish the BCBA designation further in the field of autism, we may have lost sight of what is important: the most effective and best possible service delivery of ABA therapy to improve the lives of children and their families with autism. I firmly believe that this will be accomplished with the BCBA’s as part of a team of professionals working together with an RHP overseer and centering the services provided around the child with autism and their families.
Regards,
Concerned Autism Families in Ontario (Canada)
13 Comments
Please do not remove the overseer role of Clinical Psychologist in the new OAP. BCBAs are experts in IBI/ABA, but they have limited training in child development, autism, or mental health. Clinical psychologists are trained to understand the bio-psycho-social underpinnings of autism and ensure that the child receiving IBI/ABA is receiving the treatment in a way that takes into account the bio-psycho-social components. Without this understanding, the IBI/ABA treatment will lack effectiveness, and could even be harmful to the child. Please make the right decision and keep the Clinical Psychologist in the role of the overseer of IBI/ABA programming.
Having a BCBA is not enough to ensure best practice in supervising programs for individuals with ASD.
I cannot emphasize how important it is for a clinical psychologist to be looking over my son's progress. BCBA's are not trained. You cannot ask a bus driver to fix his bus when it breaks down. HE IS NOT A MECHANIC!
I cannot over emphasize the importance of this petition. As a service provider the support and clinical competency I have gained from having a RHP (C.Psych) supervise my IBI (and other) caseload is invaluable.
Please put the needs of children first. Removing the requirement of a clinical psychologist overseer does NOT benefit children. This is the professional agenda of organizations who want professional autonomy on the backs of our children. Please keep this requirement of the C. Psych. BCBA are unlicensed/un-regulated and have a very narrow scope of practice (behaviour) that makes them inappropriate as supervisors of this program. There is too much potential for conflict of interest if they are also acting as senior therapist as well as the owner of a centre that they service (as many are). Children deserve the additional oversight of the clinical psychologist.
I run an ABA/IBI centre, and a BCBA is not sufficient to supervise children's caseload. We have hired BCBA's in the past, their degree is not worth the paper it is printed on.
Let's get this right
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
BCBA's Supervision by C. Psychologists in the Delivery of the DFO Services in the New OAP
To the attention of:
Michael Nicin , Senior Policy Advisor at Office of the Minister of Children and Youth Services
Michael Coteau, Minister of Children and Youth Services
Bruce McIntosh, President of the Ontario Autism Coalition and member of the OAP Implementation Committee
Dear Mr. Nicin:
Please re-instate/not remove the requirement for an RHP (clinical psychologist) overseer to the BCBA providing ABA therapy to children receiving DFO. The quality of the services received will suffer if this is not the case. The accountability and expertise provided by the RHP is essential and will ensure the DFO funds are spent to achieve the best possible outcome for children receiving DFO with the delivery of quality services.
I have significant concerns about the removal of the requirement of an RHP as clinician in charge overseer for BCBA's in this OAP.
I feel strongly that the expertise of a clinical psychologist (an RHP) is critical for not only accountability and quality in service delivery but also for breadth and depth of knowledge of child and human development, co-morbid disorders and other psychological issues that are beyond the scope of expertise possessed by a BCBA. I want the BCBA to have an overseer to turn to for guidance and problem solve as well as that third tier of accountability for ensuring that the programs implemented were all consistently clinically sound and appropriate. I know that that this clinical overseer will enhance the quality of therapy that my child will receive in the OAP.
The level of knowledge, expertise and experience is widely variable across the BCBA designation. It is the presence of the clinical psychologist (RHP) as the clinician in charge that contributes to and ensures the quality assurance and continuity. Having this overseer also ensures a clinical accountability from the BCBA to the clinical psychologist and safeguards quality service delivery and clinical guidelines being adhered to.
I have great concerns with removing the requirement of this clinician in charge being an RHP to oversee the service delivery. I am concerned that the removal of this contingency will affect the quality of the services provided to children as well as consistent clinically appropriate and competent ABA therapy.
I believe that newly board certified behaviour analysts especially require the oversight of an RHP with a BCBA designation right out of school. I believe it is ill-advised to remove this guidance, support and expertise that the RHP clinician in charge would provide.
A two-year masters program and 1500 hours of practicum and passing a board exam do not qualify an individual to have the clinical judgement and expertise of a clinical psychologist nor the clinical accountability of an RHP.
I worry that in the pursuit to gain more credibility and establish the BCBA designation further in the field of autism, we may have lost sight of what is important: the most effective and best possible service delivery of ABA therapy to improve the lives of children and their families with autism. I firmly believe that this will be accomplished with the BCBA’s as part of a team of professionals working together with an RHP overseer and centering the services provided around the child with autism and their families.
Regards,
Concerned Autism Families in Ontario (Canada)
13 Comments
There are already too many organizations that rarely supervise and properly train their staff and therapists, please do not allow it to continue further by removing this level of supervision.
Please do not remove the overseer role of Clinical Psychologist in the new OAP. BCBAs are experts in IBI/ABA, but they have limited training in child development, autism, or mental health. Clinical psychologists are trained to understand the bio-psycho-social underpinnings of autism and ensure that the child receiving IBI/ABA is receiving the treatment in a way that takes into account the bio-psycho-social components. Without this understanding, the IBI/ABA treatment will lack effectiveness, and could even be harmful to the child. Please make the right decision and keep the Clinical Psychologist in the role of the overseer of IBI/ABA programming.
Having a BCBA is not enough to ensure best practice in supervising programs for individuals with ASD.
I cannot emphasize how important it is for a clinical psychologist to be looking over my son's progress. BCBA's are not trained. You cannot ask a bus driver to fix his bus when it breaks down. HE IS NOT A MECHANIC!
I cannot over emphasize the importance of this petition. As a service provider the support and clinical competency I have gained from having a RHP (C.Psych) supervise my IBI (and other) caseload is invaluable.
Please put the needs of children first. Removing the requirement of a clinical psychologist overseer does NOT benefit children. This is the professional agenda of organizations who want professional autonomy on the backs of our children. Please keep this requirement of the C. Psych. BCBA are unlicensed/un-regulated and have a very narrow scope of practice (behaviour) that makes them inappropriate as supervisors of this program. There is too much potential for conflict of interest if they are also acting as senior therapist as well as the owner of a centre that they service (as many are). Children deserve the additional oversight of the clinical psychologist.
I run an ABA/IBI centre, and a BCBA is not sufficient to supervise children's caseload. We have hired BCBA's in the past, their degree is not worth the paper it is printed on.
Let's get this right
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 100 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
There are already too many organizations that rarely supervise and properly train their staff and therapists, please do not allow it to continue further by removing this level of supervision.