Help stop a housing development next to a SSSI meadow in Hereford
239 Comments
J
Jeremy Platt
11 years ago
Such beautiful and important meadow, deserves to remain so!
J
Jeremy Platt
11 years ago
This area should not be built on as it is an SSSI
H
Hilary Exton
11 years ago
SSSIs should be protected not built on.
A
Anne Holman
11 years ago
what a place to choose!
N
Nic Howes
11 years ago
Featured
Hereford's rural-urban fringe is one of the city's great attractions. Bovis' proposal is too great an encroachment into the fringe, especially when large brownfield sites remain undeveloped, for instance the urban site of Whitecross School and the Edgar Street Grid.
C
Carolyn Knight
11 years ago
Featured
This proposed development would irreversibly damage a very rare ecosystem. In addition, allowing building on or near a natural floodplain will cause the residents misery in years to come. the lung needs a natural floodplain which should not be encroached upon
S
Shelagh Tierney
11 years ago
I support Hereford Councils decision to reject this application, especially because of the impact it would have on the rare meadow.
D
David Taft
11 years ago
Any development that affects a flood plain is irresponsible for the people who may live there and when it is a site with the highest level of environmental protection it would show a complete disregard for any environmental significance of the site.
J
Julie Young
11 years ago
This area needs to be preserved but more than this building on a flood plain is unacceptable - enough owners have enough difficulty getting insurance in such circumstances- why run the risks when other suitable areas to build on.
S
Sally Pike
11 years ago
This development could destroy the only remaining Lammas meadow in the country. I am not opposed to development per se, it just needs to be in the right location.
L
Liz Greenshields
11 years ago
Lugg Meadows are one of Herefords treasures & should be preserved. Biulding houses near or on flood plans is bad for the people who will occupy them & those effected as nature compensates by pushing the water elsewhere.
O
Olwen E Clutterbuck
11 years ago
This development, if allowed, would damage an area that has been unchanged since Mediaval times
L
Linda Newport
11 years ago
There must be better places to build houses
P
phyllis turvill
11 years ago
We need to save our special spaces
S
stef Batchelor
11 years ago
This is the Easiest and WORST option. We do need housing but this should be affordable and not in positions which damage rural amenities and SSSIs. Hereford City already has serious traffic problems and with this site they will opnly increase.have ser
C
Colin BEARD
11 years ago
The proposed site is much too near the SSSI
J
Julian Potter
11 years ago
The Lugg meadows are unique and must be protected from this application
G
geoff hancock
11 years ago
once it's gone it's gone!
D
Dr Dave Jeffery
11 years ago
Don't build here! Please think - not just of developers' profits
P
peter randall
11 years ago
In winter, the whole area may be flooded to a depth of over 1m for long periods, and access becomes impossible or dangerous. Take care when walking near the river as there are vertical cliffs along its banks.
Such beautiful and important meadow, deserves to remain so!
This area should not be built on as it is an SSSI
SSSIs should be protected not built on.
what a place to choose!
Hereford's rural-urban fringe is one of the city's great attractions. Bovis' proposal is too great an encroachment into the fringe, especially when large brownfield sites remain undeveloped, for instance the urban site of Whitecross School and the Edgar Street Grid.
This proposed development would irreversibly damage a very rare ecosystem. In addition, allowing building on or near a natural floodplain will cause the residents misery in years to come. the lung needs a natural floodplain which should not be encroached upon
I support Hereford Councils decision to reject this application, especially because of the impact it would have on the rare meadow.
Any development that affects a flood plain is irresponsible for the people who may live there and when it is a site with the highest level of environmental protection it would show a complete disregard for any environmental significance of the site.
This area needs to be preserved but more than this building on a flood plain is unacceptable - enough owners have enough difficulty getting insurance in such circumstances- why run the risks when other suitable areas to build on.
This development could destroy the only remaining Lammas meadow in the country. I am not opposed to development per se, it just needs to be in the right location.
Lugg Meadows are one of Herefords treasures & should be preserved. Biulding houses near or on flood plans is bad for the people who will occupy them & those effected as nature compensates by pushing the water elsewhere.
This development, if allowed, would damage an area that has been unchanged since Mediaval times
There must be better places to build houses
We need to save our special spaces
This is the Easiest and WORST option. We do need housing but this should be affordable and not in positions which damage rural amenities and SSSIs. Hereford City already has serious traffic problems and with this site they will opnly increase.have ser
The proposed site is much too near the SSSI
The Lugg meadows are unique and must be protected from this application
once it's gone it's gone!
Don't build here! Please think - not just of developers' profits
In winter, the whole area may be flooded to a depth of over 1m for long periods, and access becomes impossible or dangerous. Take care when walking near the river as there are vertical cliffs along its banks.