Skip to main content
Against density > 1 house per 2 acres on Winns Church/Greenwood

Against density > 1 house per 2 acres on Winns Church/Greenwood

131 signatures 119 to reach 250
E
erica B. signed
P
Paul p. signed
C
Chris A. signed
K
Kathy B. signed
C
Christine C. signed
D
Deborah T. signed
L
Lynwood T. signed
S
Someone signed
K
Kelly H. signed
G
Gary H. signed
CR
Started by Clint Robertson 4 years, 9 months ago

The property owners and residents of Winns Church Rd. and Greenwood Rd. are against any development of land where the density would exceed 1 home per 2 acres. Lots are currently 2 acres or more and that should be maintained to continue the rural feeling of our community. Currently there is a proposed density of 1.9 houses per acre and that would overburden our infrastructure, It would also change our community into one which we did not seek when purchasing our property or when choosing to live in this neighborhood. Please respect what we have and refuse any applications which would seek a density greater than 1 home per 2 acres.

Updates

January 3, 2022

The proposed development density remains a direct threat to our infrastructure and our rural character. Call your local representative today to insist they vote against any application exceeding one home per two acres. We are currently preparing our testimony to present at the next planning commission hearing.

January 3, 2022

We hit our first major milestone today and it proves our neighbors are united against this density proposal. Post this link to your local community Facebook group and text three friends who live on our roads to keep this momentum going.

Reached 100 supporters

January 3, 2022

39 Comments

K
katherine W Sklarek
4 years ago Featured

We are against houses going up on this road that are less than 2 acres per house. The road itself will not support the increased traffic if all 262 houses are put in and dump trucks and tractor trailers/18 wheelers are going to ruin the condition of the road (Winns Church Road), as well as the road being too narrow and curvy to support vehicles of that size and weight constantly using it to get to and from the building sites of the proposed houses. Multiple accidents are going to happen as a result of these larger trucks and trailers using Winns Church Road, and residents will be in jeopardy just walking to and from their mailboxes (some people have to cross the road to get to their mailbox).

K
katherine W Sklarek
4 years ago Featured

we are against density, one house per 2 acres will ease traffic flow and will keep the same type of houses/land ratio that is currently on Winns Church Road.

A
Angela Lee
4 years ago Featured

This area is country roads, narrow winding 2 lanes, often tractors moving to fields., lots of deer and wildlife, no stop lights. Adding a dense neighborhood in the middle of all this is a safety issue and not in keeping with the surrounding community. Bigger lot sizes, approx 2 acres, to reduce the traffic and infrastructure demands is more in line with the area.

A
Ann and Jim Rice
4 years ago Featured

My wife and I have enjoyed living on Winns Church Road for more than twenty five years. Adding the proposed 262 houses, each having around two vehicles per house, will likely produce 524 vehicles on the road twice a day during rush hours. This will not only take the joy out of lining in this community, but will cause safety hazards that are not acceptable. Winns Church Road is a narrow, shoulder-less road with hills and blind curves that was not designed for such heavy traffic. The number of vehicles entering route 33 will certainly require a traffic light which should not be paid for by the taxpayers of the county. Allowing such a development with the proposed density will be irresponsible.

A
A Harris
4 years ago Featured

Please - VOTE NO! I have lived off of Winns Church most of my life. There is enough traffic as it is on Greenwood as it's being used as a cut through road! Forget about walking this neighborhood. Too dangerous.

L
L Yang
4 years ago Featured

I moved from Twin Hickory to Glen Allen / Hanover drawn by comparatively quiet and peaceful aspects of rural living. Saddened by this development plan.

P
Paul pyle
3 years ago

Way to much traffic for the area to a aready dangerous intersection

C
Chris Anthony
3 years ago

Same story, different subdivision and/or warehouse. We keep telling our elected officials the same thing for the past 20 years: Our roads, schools, Fire and EMS are not capable of supporting the growth they keep approving. How about the developers build us a new school and a fire station and then we can talk.

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.

Sign Petition

We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.

or sign with Email

Add a comment?

Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.

By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code