Skip to main content

The legal arguments we presented have finally been acknowledged and the policies regarding these mandates are being dismantled. I am grateful to the 354 people who stood by this conviction when it seemed like a distant possibility. We will remain vigilant to ensure these constitutional protections are fully honored moving …

April 21, 2020

Abolish Child Support Laws

Abolish Child Support Laws

🏆 Won — 502 supporters Verified

Final supporters

A
Austin C.
R
Rosetta C.
R
Robert H.
D
Daniel P.
B
Brandon S.
W
Withheld
A
Aaron S.
C
Couper B.
S
Someone
F
Frederick G.
+492 more
Started by Anonymous 13 years, 10 months ago

Child support laws should be abolished based on violating your 7th, 13th, 14th amendments and Color of Law-Deprivation of Rights Statute Title 18 Sec 242. The 7th amendment gives you the right to trial by jury for a civil case exceeding twenty dollars. The right is usually waived or denied BY THE JUDGE. The 13th amendment "1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." -U.S. Constitution, 13th amendment.

In other words, no STATE OR JUDGE can force you to work (involuntary servitude)so that they can be COMPENSATED (arrears, surcharges, court orders, imprisonment, attorney fees, court costs) Can't be a conviction of crime without due process of law.

The 14th amendment: "1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."-U.S. Constitution, 14th amendment.

Direct violation of this occurs with every enforced order: deprivation of liberty(jail) and/or property (money,assets)without due process of law (trial).

This in turn, creates a conflict of interest which ALSO denies you ever having the chance ofa 'fair' trial. Conflict of interest: "A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary."-legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/conflict+of+interest.

Which means the JUDGE, ATTORNEY AND STATE ARE 'AWARDED' BENEFITS FOR EACH ORDER ENFORCED THROUGH F.O.C. THE STATE OF MICHIGAN (FOR EXAMPLE)RECEIVES ARREARS AND SURCHARGES ON CASES THAT EXCEED A CERTAIN DOLLAR AMOUNT.

Child Support Laws even abolish themselves and PUNISHES THOSE TRYING TO ENFORCE THEM : Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

"This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.

This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race.

Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.Civil Applications Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or U.S. laws. "-Federal Bureau of Investigations http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/federal-statutes

Updates

Reached 250 supporters

March 9, 2020

Reached 100 supporters

April 29, 2018

236 Comments

B
Brandon pauley
3 years ago Featured

I have 5 kids 2 moms first one receives 1500 month and the second 1000 month I only make 3k after taxes. Cannot afford to eat , housing bills and I am now facing the possiblity of losing my license or going to jail because of back child support

S
Sederick D Ervin
3 years ago Featured

Child support is debtors prison and should be for absent parents and not failed relationships. It's also completely unfair that in a 50/50 custody agreement someone still pays child support to the other parent.

E
Eric Lee Musse
6 years ago Featured

I've been a slave to the system and my ex wife for 9 yrs. It's disgusting that I've been forced into poverty while helping my ex live comfortably and paying fees towards the courts. ABOLISH this disgusting and I humane regulation and mandate that only damages child/father relationships.

K
Kristen Galeana
6 years ago Featured

I'm a mother with 50/50 custody and provide my childrens insurance and also all out of pocket expenses, also make all appointments and bring them to all appointments. After researching, ive realized that it was all about the money and not the children .

J
Josef Maison
6 years ago Featured

I can say as a father who is in child's life that the laws governing child support are absolutely ridiculous. I know my son's mother abuses it. I never realized it was a constitutional violation as well. Being a strong supporter of the constitution I feel it needs to be abolished.

M
Mike
7 years ago Featured

They take away our way to work if we can't afford to pay, so we can't pay bc we can't get to work we can't get to work bc we have no DL we have no DL bc we can't afford to pay it's a vicious circle we father's can't even afford to eat hardly this has to stop

A
Austin Carr
3 months ago

I whole heartedly agree with this movement.

R
Robert Hughes
5 months ago

Non absent parents should not have the burden of child support just because the parents aren’t in a relationship and live apart.