Skip to main content
Opposition to California Assembly Bill 1032

Opposition to California Assembly Bill 1032

615 signatures 135 to reach 750
W
wally s. signed
G
greg a. signed
R
Rick A. signed
J
Jeremy F. signed
S
Someone signed
A
april signed
E
Ed J. signed
R
Robert G. signed
D
David J. signed
B
Bill K. signed
Started by Anonymous 19 years, 3 months ago
California Assembly Bill 1032 acts to amend Fish and Game Code Section 5653 (use of any vacuum or suction dredge equipment), and to amend, repeal, and add Section 5653.7. This bill was introduced by California Assembly Member Wolk on 22 Feb 2007, has been amended twice in Assembly (27 March and 16 April 2007) and was subject of a hearing conducted by the Assembly Committee on Appropriations (25 April 2007). This bill, if approved, authorizes the Department of Fish and Game to prohibit small scale mining activities from occurring on valid Federal mining claims on public land as authorized in the Mining Law of 1872. This bill, if approved, permits the Department of Fish and Game to close waters to suction dredging if the department determines closure is necessary to protect fish and wildlife resources. It does not outline department requirements prior to enacting such closure. This bill seeks to blame small scale miners but does not address other activities such as fishing, rafting, kayaking, cattle grazing. The Department of Fish and Game has yet to complete comprehensive studies which prove that small scale mining activities adversely affect fish dwelling waters. On 20 Dec 2006, the California Department of Fish and Game was ordered by Alameda County Court Judge Sabraw to complete an Environmental Impact Report on suction dredging within 18 months of the Court Order. There have been, however, factual studies conducted by multiple sources which conclude that suction dredging on rivers and streams actually increases spawning conditions by breaking up severely compacted river gravels and bed surface materials. Studies also show that fish congregate to old mining gravels as their choice for spawning and rearing. AB 1032 contains no factual evidence which indicates that small scale miners utilizing suction dredges on Federally approved mining claims are responsible for degrading the habitat or spawning grounds of any fish or wildlife. For this reason, the below signed petitioners oppose AB 1032.

Updates

Reached 500 supporters

August 4, 2007

Reached 100 supporters

May 3, 2007

6 Comments

B
Bill Dixon
19 years ago Featured

Total garbage bill. Seems like CA just wants to keep closing off public land for no good reason.

S
Sarah Oliver
19 years ago Featured

My husband has been panning and dredging in these parts for years. He respects the land more than anyone I know. Stop the overreach.

D
Dave Pearce
19 years ago Featured

WHERE IS THE PROOF? They keep attacking small claim holders but cant show any actual data. Let the court order play out first.

M
Mike Dunn
19 years ago Featured

Ridiculous to single out miners when there is so much more damage done by heavy industry and commercial runoff. Leave these guys alone.

L
Linda Kumar
19 years ago Featured

Unbelievable. Why not look at the cattle grazing or the rafting companies? This is just picking on the little guy.

R
Robert Abbott
19 years ago Featured

Small scale dredging is not the problem. This is just another way to kill our rights on federal land.

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 750 signatures.

Your share link

Share directly