Skip to main content
Demands and suggestions of GConnect Community regarding Sixth Pay Commission

Demands and suggestions of GConnect Community regarding Sixth Pay Commission

271 signatures 229 to reach 500
S
Someone signed
K
Krishna U. signed
M
modular h. signed
B
bookmarks signed
V
VK S. signed
S
Someone signed
S
Someone signed
S
Someone signed
D
dushyant signed
P
P.C.Sharma signed
Started by Anonymous 18 years, 1 month ago
(Content and link of this page are to be sent through email to the Cabinet Secretary and Secretaries of Empowered Committee who have been appointed for processing 6th Pay commission recommendations) Respected Sirs, At the outset, we the members/readers of GConnect, appreciate and thank the Government for the efforts taken so far in implementing the Sixth Pay Commission recommendations. The following points are our genuine suggestions and demands with regard to 6CPC. We strongly believe that each of these points has a rationale behind it, and we humbly request you to consider these points while implementing the Pay Commission. 1. The following demands put forth by Confederation of Central Government Employees may please be considered. (a) Inclusion of DA on DP (i.e. 12%) in the construction of Pay bands and consequently in the fixation benefit. (b) The defect in the computation of minimum wage with special reference to the price differential of WSP and retail price and the exclusion of 25% and 10% meant for various expenses; social obligation; old age social security; housing etc.. The fact that had the minimum wage been computed with reference to 5th CPC formulation it would have been far greater than Rs. 5740. ie. It would have been Rs.7400. (c) The discrimination in the fitment benefit between the officers and employees ranging from 181% to 15% and the need to accept the suggestion of the Staff Side for a minimum benefit of 2.625 times of basic pay in the fitment formula. (d) The necessity of affording a minimum benefit of 10% on promotion in the background of the fact that the recommended benefit of 2.5% would be too low and would even result in the reduction of take home salary on promotion, especially in the case of person who are perforce transferred out on promotion. (e) Parity in pension of pre-1996 and post 1996 retirees; discrimination in the grant of family pension; minimum pension and revision in exgratia to SRPF/CPF retirees. 2. Pay scales applicable to employees of CSS may be introduced to the similarly placed employees working field offices/subordinate offices of central govt. 3. Annual increment rate may be fixed minimum 3.5%. 4. Adhoc bonus may be regularized. 5. ACP may be revised from 2 to 3. 6. Group \'B\' gazetted grades may not be clubbed with NGO. Those who have put more number of years may be given extra percentage in pension. 7. Transport allowance and City compensatory Allowance may not be combined. 8. PB-3 is the only band where for S-26 & S-27 the initial pay in the revised scale is less than that in the pre-revised scales e.g. 16,400-20,000 revised to 15600 - 39,100. PB-3 should, therefore, be split or a new pay band be given to the upper scales of PB-3 (14300

Updates

June 25, 2008

Reaching 250 signatures proves so many of us feel the same frustration regarding these pay commission flaws. Seeing this level of engagement reminds me exactly why I started this for my colleagues who deserve fair treatment.

Reached 250 supporters

June 24, 2008

June 17, 2008

Seeing one hundred people put their name behind these demands for fair pay is overwhelming. This issue has weighed on my household for so long and knowing I am not alone in this fight gives me hope.

Reached 100 supporters

June 16, 2008

June 14, 2008

We are approaching the one hundred signature mark and I need you to help push us over that ledge today. If we reach this milestone now it proves we have the momentum to force the Cabinet Secretary to truly listen to our families.

6 Comments

A
Amit Jackson
18 years ago Featured

FIX IT. The 6CPC is not working for the common employee. We deserve better logic in the calculation.

P
Priya Mendoza
18 years ago Featured

Agreed with the points mentioned. Hope the committee listens to these genuine concerns instead of ignoring us.

S
Suresh Lawson
18 years ago Featured

Just look at the retail prices vs the WSP. The math is clearly wrong. Do justice to the central govt employees.

S
Sunita Kelly
18 years ago Featured

Living costs are rising every single day and our wages are stuck. The calculation for the minimum wage needs to be fair.

V
Vikram Townsend
18 years ago Featured

Too much discrimination between staff and officers. We all deserve a decent hike considering inflation is crazy high right now.

R
Ramesh Gomez
18 years ago Featured

The disparity is just too much. Working hard for years and the fitment benefit does not reflect that at all. Please consider the revision.

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 500 signatures.

Sign Petition

We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.

or sign with Email

Add a comment?

Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.

By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code