The village has reached its capacity, and further housing would place unacceptable pressure on local infrastructure and change the character of the community. Also flooding in the area.
V
vera Curtis
3 months ago
It is in wrong place. The lane is subject to heavy flooding made worse by the warehouses towards Pineham. Concreting over more land will increase hardship to those who live at bottom beech lane who already suffer hardship as a result. Historic area will be spoiled.
S
Simon Mason-holt Mason-Holt
3 months ago
We need to look after the infrastructure of the village
K
Karen Chapman
3 months ago
Heavy traffic on Beech Lane, floods there and will spoil the area. Also, access to the bridge is tight on the corner from Beech Lane and very difficult to see traffic coming.
M
Mark Wilkinson
3 months ago
I object to the loss of the green rural space in the village.
S
Stephen Aket
3 months ago
Camp Lane is a lovely ancient track of historical significance. The other infrastructure within kislingbury is not capable of supporting a significant quantity of additional housing. I am 100% against this proposed development.
P
Pete Marlow
3 months ago
The government and local council should not be forcing more houses on historic villages like this. If they have to build more house build them on brown field sites in towns and cities. Leave the countryside alone.
H
Hilary Nevison-Andrews
3 months ago
I am in agreement with all the objections put forward for this development
A
Aleksandra Kowalska
3 months ago
Local residents therefore this will directly impact us
P
Paul Bayley
3 months ago
I have lived in kislingbury on and off for 27 years now ,grew up here as a child too.Its a lovely village and already big enough with over 500 properties and population of around 1500,so another 58 properties would be a disaster in my opinion, especially in beech lane near the playing fields,the traffic would be a nightmare in the village, it's bad enough now.
C
Chris Payne
3 months ago
This petition shows the strength of the feeling in our community about this Planning Application and we should be proud of that and our village.
K
Kirsten Carpenter
3 months ago
Protect our green spaces, limit traffic as access is not suitable, the area already floods, extra pressure on resources such as local doctors and school
M
Mike Pacitto
3 months ago
I have already objected to the development for a variety of reasons outlined in my objection logged against the application on the planning portal .
B
Brigitte Savin de Larclause
3 months ago
This application far exceeds the village plan why did we do one if the authorities pay no attention, village infrastructure will not cope even more human waste will be pumped into open water again authorities ignore reality that the pumping station is not big enough .More cars through our village roads AND over our historic bridge. Will the authorities only listen once the bridge collapses. Finally the developers are NOT building lower entry homes they are building more of what we already have
J
Jo Purcell
3 months ago
Keep our green land Green.
B
Brian Thomas
3 months ago
Featured
I do not want this new build, as it nice for walker, also it help to take some of the flood water away, before it hit the village,
As I know from storm in 2024 where we were flooded,
S
Samantha Sarson
3 months ago
Village does not need or want this development
P
Phoebe Ward
3 months ago
My village
G
Gwen Duffield
3 months ago
Featured
There is already problems with flooding and drain issues when there is heavy rainfall that have not been addressed. The bridge over the river is being repaired due to damage from the large traffic flow through the village on an hourly basis. The village has only one shop with only limited parking outside n parking in general throughout the village is an issue. To add more traffic/housing can only make a bad situation worse., unless it comes with the guarantee that all these issues will be fixed
We do not need anymore houses in our village..
The village has reached its capacity, and further housing would place unacceptable pressure on local infrastructure and change the character of the community. Also flooding in the area.
It is in wrong place. The lane is subject to heavy flooding made worse by the warehouses towards Pineham. Concreting over more land will increase hardship to those who live at bottom beech lane who already suffer hardship as a result. Historic area will be spoiled.
We need to look after the infrastructure of the village
Heavy traffic on Beech Lane, floods there and will spoil the area. Also, access to the bridge is tight on the corner from Beech Lane and very difficult to see traffic coming.
I object to the loss of the green rural space in the village.
Camp Lane is a lovely ancient track of historical significance. The other infrastructure within kislingbury is not capable of supporting a significant quantity of additional housing. I am 100% against this proposed development.
The government and local council should not be forcing more houses on historic villages like this. If they have to build more house build them on brown field sites in towns and cities. Leave the countryside alone.
I am in agreement with all the objections put forward for this development
Local residents therefore this will directly impact us
I have lived in kislingbury on and off for 27 years now ,grew up here as a child too.Its a lovely village and already big enough with over 500 properties and population of around 1500,so another 58 properties would be a disaster in my opinion, especially in beech lane near the playing fields,the traffic would be a nightmare in the village, it's bad enough now.
This petition shows the strength of the feeling in our community about this Planning Application and we should be proud of that and our village.
Protect our green spaces, limit traffic as access is not suitable, the area already floods, extra pressure on resources such as local doctors and school
I have already objected to the development for a variety of reasons outlined in my objection logged against the application on the planning portal .
This application far exceeds the village plan why did we do one if the authorities pay no attention, village infrastructure will not cope even more human waste will be pumped into open water again authorities ignore reality that the pumping station is not big enough .More cars through our village roads AND over our historic bridge. Will the authorities only listen once the bridge collapses. Finally the developers are NOT building lower entry homes they are building more of what we already have
Keep our green land Green.
I do not want this new build, as it nice for walker, also it help to take some of the flood water away, before it hit the village, As I know from storm in 2024 where we were flooded,
Village does not need or want this development
My village
There is already problems with flooding and drain issues when there is heavy rainfall that have not been addressed. The bridge over the river is being repaired due to damage from the large traffic flow through the village on an hourly basis. The village has only one shop with only limited parking outside n parking in general throughout the village is an issue. To add more traffic/housing can only make a bad situation worse., unless it comes with the guarantee that all these issues will be fixed