Skip to main content

Save the Blackdown Vale

687 Comments

J
Jane Btown Verified
1 month ago

The countryside in this area is not meant to be built on. It’s stunning and beautiful. We do not need another town. Roads, school, GP’s etc etc already overrun with people.

R
Rachel Drew Verified
1 month ago

It would be a travesty to cover that area of AONB with houses.

A
Adam Folkes Verified
1 month ago

Beautiful scenery ruined

E
EMMA TURNER Verified
1 month ago

I live in Stoke st Mary and I live here because of its beautiful countryside, wildlife and peace. This development will ruin not only here but the whole of Taunton. Building needs to stop we don’t have the infrastructure to cope with so many or any more houses.

J
Janet Penrose Verified
1 month ago

Once the character and nature of this area is lost it is gone forever

C
Catherine Harris Verified
1 month ago

This is where I live

H
Helen Keeble Verified
1 month ago

This new town is being built on farmland in a rural area. Taylor Wimpy's proposal to leave large areas of the site as green spaces will do little to mitigate the huge impact on the area of 7,000 new homes. The increase in traffic on what are currently quiet country lanes which are used by horse riders, walkers etc will be devastating. The impact on local medical services, pharmacies, dentists etc will be detrimental to local residents this side of Taunton.

S
Supporter Verified
1 month ago

Save the rural areas from housing estates, keep them in towns but not in villages

J
Janette Powell Verified
1 month ago

Stoke St Mary could end up completely cut off

J
Jill Baker Verified
1 month ago

My father farmed Greenway farm 400 acres for 40 years .family are indigenous to the beautiful area

M
Martin Garbutt Verified
1 month ago

The authorities need to insist developers build on brown field sites first and improve the infrastructure to cope with the existing population before even considering building more houses.

S
Susan Garbutt Verified
1 month ago

Brownfield sites in Taunton, enough for 8000 houses available so this should be built on first, not taking agricultural land east of the motorway. M5 is a demarcation line for no development east. The Crown sold it as agricultural and Taylor Wimpey paid agricultural price for it.

D
Deborah Young Verified
1 month ago

protect green spaces

R
Ross Lewis Verified
1 month ago

The infrastructure is already unusable as it is in Taunton. Try and get an NHS dentist, you can't. Try and get a doctors appointment, wait a month, then wait another month or more for a blood test, then a month again for the results. This area should be preserved as it is, enough of the urbanisation of farmland and woodland areas.

T
Tash Watson Verified
1 month ago

I work in the area and don't want the beautiful surroundings to be unnecessarily spoilt. Taunton is already struggling with the growth of housing and amenities not being provided to carer for the expansion.

S
Sally Ravenor Verified
1 month ago

This is not a sustainable development and will ruin good land ment for agriculture. It will overcrowd and overpopulate this area. There are many brown field sites suitable for development and this is not one of them

S
Shirley Cozens Verified
1 month ago

All building stays the other side of the motorway please leave villages as villages

G
Gill Ellis Verified
1 month ago

It would be a tragedy to cover this beautiful rural space with buildings. Keep development west of the M5.

A
Alexander Kerley Verified
1 month ago

Huge negative effect on the existing residents and a massive impact on the natural environment in an area of outstanding natural beauty

S
Susan Smyth Verified
1 month ago

Huge development which take away farmland and wildlife also will increase global warming we need to keep our farmland to help reduce our carbon footprint by growing our own food especially in the current climate of the state of the world. Also a huge impact of the villages and the Blackdown Hills as they will gradually disappear