Safe Access for residents to Hemel Hempstead Station
191 Comments
J
James Davis
1 month ago
I use this entrance for my regular commute and my family use it regularly. Really disappointed that this closure is happening.
S
Supporter
1 month ago
This proposed closure is creating a big safety issue.
S
Sam T
1 month ago
My parents live on a road behind the station. My father has Dementia, struggles with walking alone due to forgetting directions. This is vital for both access to the station and pass through - as he has done for 15+ years. The removal of access puts his safety significantly at risk and unlikely able to walk alone, not using the alternate routes for such a long period. He has limited independence already and the closure either removes the little he has or puts his safety at risk.
A
Adrian Southworth
1 month ago
This access provides a safe access to Hemel station. The alternative is to walk under the railway bridge using a very narrow path - I am surprised no one has been injured using this path . Using it is an accident waiting to happen!
J
James Davis
1 month ago
It avoids a long walk along a dangerous road
K
Kelly Su
1 month ago
What a silly proposal. I’ve used the back gate since it was installed and is the safest, quickest route home
S
Sam Follett
1 month ago
I have had access to this walk way since I attended secondary school I am 38 so that’s 28 years,
My son will be going through to catch transport to his secondary school and it’s not safe for him to walk around the back route in the winter
K
Kay Follett
1 month ago
We have lived on Roughdown Avenue as long as can remember, having access to this gate for over 3 decades. We’d love to know the safety implications, because as far as we can remember; the fast trains have always operated on platform 4, this never been an issue for all decades. So, why now? My safety issue, is the state of the railway, happy to send photos. My son needs access for school— nothing is safe about the other routes in autumn/winter! will you be putting lights on these routes?
J
Jay Thomas
1 month ago
I regularly use this gate to get to work and back as i am a bartender it is not safe for me to walk the whole way round during antisocial hours of the night/morning.
L
Linda French
1 month ago
I live Roughdown Avenue, regularly returning from work in Central London after midnight it is not safe to walk from London Road in dark, I would be very nervous; taxi too expensive. Additionally I have health issues making the long walk challenging. There is no safety issue keeping access open but definitely putting residents at risk walking alone on main roads after dark. Rail company must install CTV cameras and motion detector lights then safety problems solved.
K
Karen Myatt
1 month ago
The b r edge that goes over the walkway in the road is not a safe place for pedestrians to walk, as road is wider than the pathways
K
Kaleigh Moten
1 month ago
It’s really unsafe for my children to walk under the bridge on London Road as it’s an incredibly narrow pathway and cars go very fast. It’s absolutely not acceptable to expect pedestrians to do so when we have a safe option of using the back entrance to the station.
This closer will affect absolutely everyone living in the surrounding area in some way. It is not acceptable to take this safe walk way away from us and cause this level of anxiety/ stress to everyone involved.
J
Jasmine Tough
1 month ago
I have to walk through the train station every morning in order to get to the bus for school and without the back door i will have to cross 6 dangerous and busy roads which makes me feel very unsafe and scared.
R
Rimi Sharma
1 month ago
We need access to the station. It is unacceptable that this being closed and restricted to Dacorum residents.
J
Jesse
1 month ago
This is important to me as it massively impacts my widowed parent who will be in shock to not use this passage. Without notifying someone when it is blatantly going to negatively impact a communities health and safety.
M
Mark Allen
1 month ago
This feels like a completely retrograde step - removing an arrangement that has served residents well for many years and leaving them with increased journey times and safety risks.
W
William Short
1 month ago
As an elderly resident I will find it impossible to walk the way you have suggested & trying to get a taxi for that distance will be difficult. I chose to live in Roughdown for safe, direct station access via the rear gate. Closing it forces residents onto a busy road and an unlit, uneven path, creating unnecessary safety risks, especially at night.
S
Steve Foster
1 month ago
I require a safe walking route from my house to the station and this would remove the option
S
steve Williams
1 month ago
This access to the station has been in place for a very long time. I can’t see any safety grounds for it not to continue. In fact the alternative route is probably much less safe.
Closing it without public consultation is pretty disgraceful and short sighted.
B
Brian Whitlock
1 month ago
I use this regular as well as as many others. There's no other safe option.
I use this entrance for my regular commute and my family use it regularly. Really disappointed that this closure is happening.
This proposed closure is creating a big safety issue.
My parents live on a road behind the station. My father has Dementia, struggles with walking alone due to forgetting directions. This is vital for both access to the station and pass through - as he has done for 15+ years. The removal of access puts his safety significantly at risk and unlikely able to walk alone, not using the alternate routes for such a long period. He has limited independence already and the closure either removes the little he has or puts his safety at risk.
This access provides a safe access to Hemel station. The alternative is to walk under the railway bridge using a very narrow path - I am surprised no one has been injured using this path . Using it is an accident waiting to happen!
It avoids a long walk along a dangerous road
What a silly proposal. I’ve used the back gate since it was installed and is the safest, quickest route home
I have had access to this walk way since I attended secondary school I am 38 so that’s 28 years, My son will be going through to catch transport to his secondary school and it’s not safe for him to walk around the back route in the winter
We have lived on Roughdown Avenue as long as can remember, having access to this gate for over 3 decades. We’d love to know the safety implications, because as far as we can remember; the fast trains have always operated on platform 4, this never been an issue for all decades. So, why now? My safety issue, is the state of the railway, happy to send photos. My son needs access for school— nothing is safe about the other routes in autumn/winter! will you be putting lights on these routes?
I regularly use this gate to get to work and back as i am a bartender it is not safe for me to walk the whole way round during antisocial hours of the night/morning.
I live Roughdown Avenue, regularly returning from work in Central London after midnight it is not safe to walk from London Road in dark, I would be very nervous; taxi too expensive. Additionally I have health issues making the long walk challenging. There is no safety issue keeping access open but definitely putting residents at risk walking alone on main roads after dark. Rail company must install CTV cameras and motion detector lights then safety problems solved.
The b r edge that goes over the walkway in the road is not a safe place for pedestrians to walk, as road is wider than the pathways
It’s really unsafe for my children to walk under the bridge on London Road as it’s an incredibly narrow pathway and cars go very fast. It’s absolutely not acceptable to expect pedestrians to do so when we have a safe option of using the back entrance to the station. This closer will affect absolutely everyone living in the surrounding area in some way. It is not acceptable to take this safe walk way away from us and cause this level of anxiety/ stress to everyone involved.
I have to walk through the train station every morning in order to get to the bus for school and without the back door i will have to cross 6 dangerous and busy roads which makes me feel very unsafe and scared.
We need access to the station. It is unacceptable that this being closed and restricted to Dacorum residents.
This is important to me as it massively impacts my widowed parent who will be in shock to not use this passage. Without notifying someone when it is blatantly going to negatively impact a communities health and safety.
This feels like a completely retrograde step - removing an arrangement that has served residents well for many years and leaving them with increased journey times and safety risks.
As an elderly resident I will find it impossible to walk the way you have suggested & trying to get a taxi for that distance will be difficult. I chose to live in Roughdown for safe, direct station access via the rear gate. Closing it forces residents onto a busy road and an unlit, uneven path, creating unnecessary safety risks, especially at night.
I require a safe walking route from my house to the station and this would remove the option
This access to the station has been in place for a very long time. I can’t see any safety grounds for it not to continue. In fact the alternative route is probably much less safe. Closing it without public consultation is pretty disgraceful and short sighted.
I use this regular as well as as many others. There's no other safe option.