Skip to main content

Safe Access for residents to Hemel Hempstead Station

191 Comments

G
Graeme Patrick Verified
1 month ago

We need to know how the existing route can be less safe than the proposed new one

N
Neil Burton Verified
1 month ago

I oppose the closure as it is far safer and we have paid to use this route. I don’t believe the breach of contract is lawful either.

G
George Ball Verified
1 month ago

This gate significantly improves my quality of life

P
Pauline Hughes Verified
1 month ago

Safer access without crossing over the A41 twice and narrow footpath. Risk of getting splashed with water after raining from traffic in road flooding. got that a lot when commuted before had back door access.

S
Sacha Roberts Verified
1 month ago

Access to station for commuting and will be very dangerous to have to cross that road twice to get to the station

S
Supporter Verified
1 month ago

Safety for local & elderly residents

M
Mark Stephens Verified
1 month ago

Ease safe access, avoidance of driving using car Please advise details of the safety concerns whose safety Please explain the issue thankyou

K
Kelly Chqpman Verified
1 month ago

Need access to commute into London, no consultation provided before decision made to how it will affect people who use this.

N
Norman Cook Verified
1 month ago

This action is unfortunately due to woke health and safety decision working against the wishes of users.

J
Joanne Cash Verified
1 month ago

The alternative suggested route is unsafe & time consuming (taking longer than the suggested 9mins with traffic)

C
Colim Willetts Verified
1 month ago

Access to local residents

D
D Jones Verified
1 month ago

It is essential for all the people who live "on the wrong side of the tracks".

M
Melanie English Verified
1 month ago

The alternative route to the station is unsafe for our children to walk.

M
Michael Thirkettle Verified
1 month ago

With a disabled son and mobility issues the additional walk down an alley and then under the main road bridge is dangerous, poor surface and could lead to injury. Especially walking under the bridge with traffic proximity. If he falls (which he often does) he could now fall into traffic which we would hold the rail company liable. This rear access is a major safety feature for getting to the station for all residents and users from the south side of London Road. The same applies for the elderly

P
Philip Hughes Verified
1 month ago

Closing the rear entrance to the station is a nightmare for locals. It basically means driving to the station or getting a taxi instead of a short walk. Ridiculous!

P
PeaShooter Harding Verified
1 month ago

For work

S
Supporter Verified
1 month ago

Safety and access reasons. Alternative very dangerous.

L
Layla Gemmell Verified
1 month ago

Limiting access without consultation to those using it. What are the reasons for closure, how many people affected, is the proposed route actually safer?

S
Stuart Child Verified
1 month ago

We are supposed to be encouraging more use of public transport, not making as difficult as possible to access it.

E
Elena Hull Verified
1 month ago

Closing the south side makes no sense.