Safe Access for residents to Hemel Hempstead Station
191 Comments
J
Julia Bell
1 month ago
I live at number 19 roughdown avenue. My partner bought the house for easy commuting into london and watford for our jobs. We have high stress jobs and this is a major factor of living where we do and spending almost a mill on buying and renovating this house to make it our forver family home. Having the access to the train station was a major factor in this decision for us
K
Kirsty O'Donnell
1 month ago
Proposed alternative is less safe
S
Samuel O'Donnell
1 month ago
Proposed alternative is less safe than current access.
D
Deborah Taylor
1 month ago
I use access and have done for years and need it to remain to gain easy access
P
Peter Robinson
1 month ago
I rely on this access for my commute to work. Losing it greatly increases the time it takes for me to get to the station, also requiring me to cross a busy road and be exposed to exhaust fumes of cars on london road. Closing the access would deprive the area of a common good, the reasons for doing so have not be substantiated
S
Spencer Jackson
1 month ago
Access from Felden to boxmoor and a right of way
K
Kelly Rogers
1 month ago
I oppose this decision due to health and safety.
W
William Wyatt-Lowe
1 month ago
This closure would add 20+ minutes to the travelling time of Roughdown Avenue residents.
P
Penny Powell
1 month ago
Stop penalising the large number of commuters that live behind the station
C
charlotte hawley
1 month ago
For everyone's safety
H
Hdjdjd Isisk
1 month ago
I am a student and use this safe access for university
K
Kuljinder Kaur
1 month ago
I agree with all the reasons provides for keeping this safe access open. I know that if it is closed there will be more pressure on traffic causing more congestion on London Road as residents who would normally walk through the safe side access will be forced to take a car. Furthermore, adding to pollution in the environment, pressure for more parking spaces and a higher probability of accidents. There is a global concern for reducing pollution and decreasing climate change.
D
Debra Simmonds
1 month ago
The alternative route is not safe for women
T
Tanya Haylock
1 month ago
Important access
E
Eddie Powell
1 month ago
The ‘alternative’ route is a massive diversion for local residents No compelling reason has been provided for why this closure is required.
J
Jay Singh
1 month ago
It is far safer than walking underneath the bridge to Felden Lane, especially in autumn/winter. It also takea longer. Put a camera at door if there is a fare dodging concern.
B
Brooklyn Thirkettle
1 month ago
Much safer to access the train station from my home this way than go around the main roads of A41
A
Anthony Badger
1 month ago
The footpath under the bridge is scary and narrow, my 4 year old daughter would be terrified by this alternate route.
L
Louise Simpson
1 month ago
Please listen to the people who use the station everyday.
H
Hilary Patrick
1 month ago
The proposed new route is far more dangerous- part of it includes a very narrow pavement going under a bridge which leaves pedestrians extremely close to fast moving traffic. This cannot be the safer option.
I live at number 19 roughdown avenue. My partner bought the house for easy commuting into london and watford for our jobs. We have high stress jobs and this is a major factor of living where we do and spending almost a mill on buying and renovating this house to make it our forver family home. Having the access to the train station was a major factor in this decision for us
Proposed alternative is less safe
Proposed alternative is less safe than current access.
I use access and have done for years and need it to remain to gain easy access
I rely on this access for my commute to work. Losing it greatly increases the time it takes for me to get to the station, also requiring me to cross a busy road and be exposed to exhaust fumes of cars on london road. Closing the access would deprive the area of a common good, the reasons for doing so have not be substantiated
Access from Felden to boxmoor and a right of way
I oppose this decision due to health and safety.
This closure would add 20+ minutes to the travelling time of Roughdown Avenue residents.
Stop penalising the large number of commuters that live behind the station
For everyone's safety
I am a student and use this safe access for university
I agree with all the reasons provides for keeping this safe access open. I know that if it is closed there will be more pressure on traffic causing more congestion on London Road as residents who would normally walk through the safe side access will be forced to take a car. Furthermore, adding to pollution in the environment, pressure for more parking spaces and a higher probability of accidents. There is a global concern for reducing pollution and decreasing climate change.
The alternative route is not safe for women
Important access
The ‘alternative’ route is a massive diversion for local residents No compelling reason has been provided for why this closure is required.
It is far safer than walking underneath the bridge to Felden Lane, especially in autumn/winter. It also takea longer. Put a camera at door if there is a fare dodging concern.
Much safer to access the train station from my home this way than go around the main roads of A41
The footpath under the bridge is scary and narrow, my 4 year old daughter would be terrified by this alternate route.
Please listen to the people who use the station everyday.
The proposed new route is far more dangerous- part of it includes a very narrow pavement going under a bridge which leaves pedestrians extremely close to fast moving traffic. This cannot be the safer option.