Preserve Inclusive, Equitable access to clubhouse facilities

Mansi Bhardwaj

Society charges more than enough maintenance for the upkeep of these facilities.

Mamta Mittal

It’s everyone right who are staying to use the facilities that came with whole package while buying this property. however we can manage the things by book per use, which can limit the over crowding of gym , basket ball and badminton court. How we maintain book per use, that needs thinking , process and implementation. Like every house gets equal number of coupons to use the facilities which limits overuse by an individual party and you buy more coupons if your usage is high

Siddharth Agarwal

This is a common facility and should be available to all.

megha chaudhary

I agree with the concern

Divya Sharma

A clubhouse is a community amenity, not a commercial service. We may not use every facility, but its maintenance is part of maintaining our society and its value. If the concern is maintenance cost, let’s discuss the expenses and optimise them. But turning common amenities into pay-per-use facilities is not the answer.

Anand Lokaya Kotian

Our facility should be free for the PSN residents. I say NO pay per use.

Naresh Kumar

Let's keep it simple for everyone please? :) However i support for a book per use policy if implemented.

Gautam Anand

The club is core part of the residences.

Sheenu Jain

Club house being part of the amenities offered by PSN and pride of all the members should be included in the CAM so that residents like us can keep enjoy using it without paying hefty charges.

Kantara 3

Who the hell started this nonsense and unwanted chaos? Everyone has enough masala in their lives already. This additional masala will backfire badly on whoever started it..

Abhay Porwal

In my view, all thr authorised residents have already paid for building of these facilities - putting a pay wall around doesn't make sense and it is not legally valid at this stage. If at all I would request my fellow residents to ensure that we residents always get the first priority over any guests/friends

Kavita Kavya

CAM and club house facilities should not be separated. It should not be use basis charges. Who all are living in this society, they should pay for all the facilities whether they use it or not. No one is stopping them to use it. For the better maintenance, it should be remained in the CAM charges.

Neha Agarwal

Making CH facilities pay per use basis doesnt go well with community living. We all enjoy one or the other part of the community living. Some do gym, some plays in park area, some uses the common space to have social gathering, do yoga, have picnic in parks, and many more activities. Each and every activity by everyone is important for their physical and mental health. One cannot do a seggregation on the maintainence cost of each and every part of our society.

Mohit Hoskote

Considering the broader implications of this having a much higher long-term cost, as well as having rules like this restricting people who have paid for the maintenance for so many years, it does not seem to be a good option to segregate. We need to make everything inclusive and equitable to everyone.

Kishore Yagnamurthy

I support the current model and there should be no separate charges basis usage. This will only a open pandaros box and disturb current harmony

Ankur Mathur

I will not pay separately for different facilities as per usage. Then I better live in a stand-alone building and take subscriptions outside

Akhil Kankal

Agree with the logic

Sarthak Agarwal

Strong agreement with all the concerns raised in the petition

Tarun Mathur

I use only Squash, it’s mostly empty all the time.

Ranjeeta Sinha

Club house facilities must be part of PSN maintenance as usual.