Skip to main content

Preserve Inclusive, Equitable access to clubhouse facilities

38 Comments

R
Rohit Sukhija Verified
1 day ago

Equitable access is the best way to sustain the infrastructure we have. Fully supportive of this.

A
Anonymous Verified
1 day ago Featured

Common amenities & Clubhouse facilities should not be charged separately. Avoids turning a residential amenity into a commercial service, clubhouse within a residential community is primarily a shared community facility, not a commercial recreation centre. Treating every activity as a paid service changes the purpose of the amenity. There may be many who are not using them but non use does not mean non benefit or non responsibility, rather other users exercising their right to access.

J
Javaji Sudheer Verified
1 day ago

It's my right

M
Mayank Kumar Arora Verified
1 day ago

Mayank

A
Amod Tripathi Verified
1 day ago

Common facilities shoukd be available for all. Making it pay per use will lead to many other aspects of the common infrastructure being subjected to similar scrutiny. How will we manage this. It's not a feasible idea.

M
Manish Wadhwani Verified
1 day ago

Sports is an integral part of a healthy, active community and not a luxury. Clubhouse sports facilities should remain accessible to all residents, without pay-per-use barriers.

R
Rahul Nair Verified
1 day ago Featured

Charging a per-use fee for amenities fundamentally alters the value proposition of living in this community.

A
Ambuj Awasthi Verified
1 day ago

Facilities like clubhouse should never be a on payment per use basis in any community.

P
POOLA NIKHIL KUMAR REDDY Verified
1 day ago

Clubhouse facilities should not be charged

A
ayush kumar Verified
1 day ago

We will loose the charm of one of the most lively societies of Bangalore. Have common facilities also helps to bring everyone togtehr with no hindrance. Pay per Use is definitely a BIG NO.

A
Aakash J Verified
1 day ago

The proposal will only cause downfall of PSN and that too when so so many people use the facility.

V
Veerendra Mishra Verified
1 day ago

Pay per Use has larger ramifications for the society which goes beyond the fair usage, pay per use, CAM etc. People who support such moves have no clue of the ground realities and problems it will create, but supporting it blindly by following the diktat from their masters! Common facilities of the complex should be accessible to any and every authorised resident. The maintenance and upkeep/renovation of the same should be done through yearly opex and capex budget.

A
Ashish Sharma Verified
1 day ago

Agree, club house facilities is a should be available to everyone without any financial barriers.

A
A Das Verified
1 day ago

Common facilities shouldn’t be on chargeable basis, that minimise inclusion amongst community folks.

A
Anuj Kumar Singh Verified
1 day ago

Few people don’t use facilities and want to restrict for others too.

S
Supporter Verified
1 day ago

I want access to clubhouse to be equal to everyone staying in Prestige Shantiniketan. Let’s not spout the beausy and unity of the society

G
Gopal Prakash Verified
1 day ago

We should not charge for club house

H
HARSH JAIN Verified
1 day ago

I agree with this. I dont see any need to convert our club house to pay per use model