Skip to main content

Preserve Inclusive, Equitable access to clubhouse facilities

42 Comments

A
Akhil Kankal Verified
1 month ago

Agree with the logic

S
Sarthak Agarwal Verified
1 month ago

Strong agreement with all the concerns raised in the petition

T
Tarun Mathur Verified
1 month ago

I use only Squash, it’s mostly empty all the time.

R
Ranjeeta Sinha Verified
1 month ago

Club house facilities must be part of PSN maintenance as usual.

R
Rohit Sukhija Verified
1 month ago

Equitable access is the best way to sustain the infrastructure we have. Fully supportive of this.

A
Anonymous Verified
1 month ago Featured

Common amenities & Clubhouse facilities should not be charged separately. Avoids turning a residential amenity into a commercial service, clubhouse within a residential community is primarily a shared community facility, not a commercial recreation centre. Treating every activity as a paid service changes the purpose of the amenity. There may be many who are not using them but non use does not mean non benefit or non responsibility, rather other users exercising their right to access.

J
Javaji Sudheer Verified
1 month ago

It's my right

M
Mayank Kumar Arora Verified
1 month ago

Mayank

A
Amod Tripathi Verified
1 month ago

Common facilities shoukd be available for all. Making it pay per use will lead to many other aspects of the common infrastructure being subjected to similar scrutiny. How will we manage this. It's not a feasible idea.

M
Manish Wadhwani Verified
1 month ago

Sports is an integral part of a healthy, active community and not a luxury. Clubhouse sports facilities should remain accessible to all residents, without pay-per-use barriers.

R
Rahul Nair Verified
1 month ago Featured

Charging a per-use fee for amenities fundamentally alters the value proposition of living in this community.

A
Ambuj Awasthi Verified
1 month ago

Facilities like clubhouse should never be a on payment per use basis in any community.

P
POOLA NIKHIL KUMAR REDDY Verified
1 month ago

Clubhouse facilities should not be charged

A
ayush kumar Verified
1 month ago

We will loose the charm of one of the most lively societies of Bangalore. Have common facilities also helps to bring everyone togtehr with no hindrance. Pay per Use is definitely a BIG NO.

A
Aakash J Verified
1 month ago

The proposal will only cause downfall of PSN and that too when so so many people use the facility.

V
Veerendra Mishra Verified
1 month ago

Pay per Use has larger ramifications for the society which goes beyond the fair usage, pay per use, CAM etc. People who support such moves have no clue of the ground realities and problems it will create, but supporting it blindly by following the diktat from their masters! Common facilities of the complex should be accessible to any and every authorised resident. The maintenance and upkeep/renovation of the same should be done through yearly opex and capex budget.

A
Ashish Sharma Verified
1 month ago

Agree, club house facilities is a should be available to everyone without any financial barriers.

A
A Das Verified
1 month ago

Common facilities shouldn’t be on chargeable basis, that minimise inclusion amongst community folks.

A
Anuj Kumar Singh Verified
1 month ago

Few people don’t use facilities and want to restrict for others too.

S
Supporter Verified
1 month ago

I want access to clubhouse to be equal to everyone staying in Prestige Shantiniketan. Let’s not spout the beausy and unity of the society