Preserve Inclusive, Equitable access to clubhouse facilities
38 Comments
R
Rohit Sukhija
1 day ago
Equitable access is the best way to sustain the infrastructure we have. Fully supportive of this.
A
Anonymous
1 day ago
Featured
Common amenities & Clubhouse facilities should not be charged separately. Avoids turning a residential amenity into a commercial service, clubhouse within a residential community is primarily a shared community facility, not a commercial recreation centre. Treating every activity as a paid service changes the purpose of the amenity. There may be many who are not using them but non use does not mean non benefit or non responsibility, rather other users exercising their right to access.
J
Javaji Sudheer
1 day ago
It's my right
M
Mayank Kumar Arora
1 day ago
Mayank
A
Amod Tripathi
1 day ago
Common facilities shoukd be available for all. Making it pay per use will lead to many other aspects of the common infrastructure being subjected to similar scrutiny. How will we manage this. It's not a feasible idea.
M
Manish Wadhwani
1 day ago
Sports is an integral part of a healthy, active community and not a luxury. Clubhouse sports facilities should remain accessible to all residents, without pay-per-use barriers.
R
Rahul Nair
1 day ago
Featured
Charging a per-use fee for amenities fundamentally alters the value proposition of living in this community.
A
Ambuj Awasthi
1 day ago
Facilities like clubhouse should never be a on payment per use basis in any community.
P
POOLA NIKHIL KUMAR REDDY
1 day ago
Clubhouse facilities should not be charged
A
ayush kumar
1 day ago
We will loose the charm of one of the most lively societies of Bangalore. Have common facilities also helps to bring everyone togtehr with no hindrance. Pay per Use is definitely a BIG NO.
A
Aakash J
1 day ago
The proposal will only cause downfall of PSN and that too when so so many people use the facility.
V
Veerendra Mishra
1 day ago
Pay per Use has larger ramifications for the society which goes beyond the fair usage, pay per use, CAM etc.
People who support such moves have no clue of the ground realities and problems it will create, but supporting it blindly by following the diktat from their masters!
Common facilities of the complex should be accessible to any and every authorised resident.
The maintenance and upkeep/renovation of the same should be done through yearly opex and capex budget.
A
Ashish Sharma
1 day ago
Agree, club house facilities is a should be available to everyone without any financial barriers.
A
A Das
1 day ago
Common facilities shouldn’t be on chargeable basis, that minimise inclusion amongst community folks.
A
Anuj Kumar Singh
1 day ago
Few people don’t use facilities and want to restrict for others too.
S
Supporter
1 day ago
I want access to clubhouse to be equal to everyone staying in Prestige Shantiniketan. Let’s not spout the beausy and unity of the society
G
Gopal Prakash
1 day ago
We should not charge for club house
H
HARSH JAIN
1 day ago
I agree with this.
I dont see any need to convert our club house to pay per use model
Equitable access is the best way to sustain the infrastructure we have. Fully supportive of this.
Common amenities & Clubhouse facilities should not be charged separately. Avoids turning a residential amenity into a commercial service, clubhouse within a residential community is primarily a shared community facility, not a commercial recreation centre. Treating every activity as a paid service changes the purpose of the amenity. There may be many who are not using them but non use does not mean non benefit or non responsibility, rather other users exercising their right to access.
It's my right
Mayank
Common facilities shoukd be available for all. Making it pay per use will lead to many other aspects of the common infrastructure being subjected to similar scrutiny. How will we manage this. It's not a feasible idea.
Sports is an integral part of a healthy, active community and not a luxury. Clubhouse sports facilities should remain accessible to all residents, without pay-per-use barriers.
Charging a per-use fee for amenities fundamentally alters the value proposition of living in this community.
Facilities like clubhouse should never be a on payment per use basis in any community.
Clubhouse facilities should not be charged
We will loose the charm of one of the most lively societies of Bangalore. Have common facilities also helps to bring everyone togtehr with no hindrance. Pay per Use is definitely a BIG NO.
The proposal will only cause downfall of PSN and that too when so so many people use the facility.
Pay per Use has larger ramifications for the society which goes beyond the fair usage, pay per use, CAM etc. People who support such moves have no clue of the ground realities and problems it will create, but supporting it blindly by following the diktat from their masters! Common facilities of the complex should be accessible to any and every authorised resident. The maintenance and upkeep/renovation of the same should be done through yearly opex and capex budget.
Agree, club house facilities is a should be available to everyone without any financial barriers.
Common facilities shouldn’t be on chargeable basis, that minimise inclusion amongst community folks.
Few people don’t use facilities and want to restrict for others too.
I want access to clubhouse to be equal to everyone staying in Prestige Shantiniketan. Let’s not spout the beausy and unity of the society
We should not charge for club house
I agree with this. I dont see any need to convert our club house to pay per use model