Skip to main content
Pilsley Article4 Direction for Houses in Multiple Occupation

Pilsley Article4 Direction for Houses in Multiple Occupation

248 signatures 2 to reach 250
P
Pam W. signed 1 minute ago
K
Ken G. signed 4 minutes ago
M
Mellor J. signed 15 minutes ago
C
Catherine S. signed 58 minutes ago
P
Peter W. signed 1 hour ago
S
Sarah jane W. signed 1 hour ago
J
Jacqui E. signed 1 hour ago
S
Sylvia H. signed 1 hour ago
H
Helen P. signed 1 hour ago
A
Amy L. signed 1 hour ago
CM
Started by Cllr Darren Muizelaar 1 day, 3 hours ago

We, the undersigned residents and supporters of the community of Pilsley, call upon North East Derbyshire District Council, as the Local Planning Authority, to investigate and bring forward an Article 4 Direction covering Pilsley, or those parts of Pilsley where the evidence demonstrates it is necessary, to remove permitted development rights for the change of use of dwellinghouses (Use Class C3) to small Houses in Multiple Occupation (Use Class C4).


We ask the Council to undertake the necessary evidence gathering and assessment to determine whether an Article 4 Direction is justified in order to protect the residential amenity, character and wellbeing of the Pilsley community and to ensure that the future development of HMOs can be appropriately considered through the planning process.

Why We Are Petitioning

Residents are concerned about the potential impact that an increasing concentration of HMOs could have upon parts of Pilsley.


While we recognise that well-managed HMOs can provide an important form of housing, we believe that an excessive concentration of HMOs within a relatively small residential community has the potential to change the character and balance of neighbourhoods and create additional pressures upon residents and local services.


Potential concerns include:

  • Ensuring our Women and Children are kept safe;
  • increased concentrations of HMOs within established residential areas;
  • loss of traditional family housing;
  • increased pressure on on-street parking;
  • increased numbers of occupants and vehicles associated with individual properties;
  • waste storage and refuse management;
  • noise and disturbance;
  • increased turnover of occupants;
  • potential impacts upon neighbouring properties and residential amenity; and
  • the cumulative effect of multiple HMOs within a concentrated geographical area.

What We Are Asking the Council to Do

We therefore request that North East Derbyshire District Council:

  1. Undertakes an assessment of the number, location and concentration of existing HMOs within Pilsley.
  2. Reviews relevant planning, housing, licensing, enforcement, environmental health, anti-social behaviour and other available evidence relating to HMOs within the area.
  3. Assesses the potential cumulative impact of further C3 dwellinghouses being converted to C4 HMOs under permitted development rights.
  4. Determines whether the evidence demonstrates that an Article 4 Direction is necessary to protect local amenity and the wellbeing of Pilsley.
  5. Identifies the appropriate geographical area within Pilsley to which an Article 4 Direction should apply, based upon the evidence collected.
  6. Subject to the evidence supporting such action, commences the statutory process necessary to introduce an Article 4 Direction removing the permitted development right for changes of use from Use Class C3 dwellinghouses to Use Class C4 small HMOs.
  7. A full register of all HMOs which includes their approximate geographical location, categorisation between Migrant HMOs and non-migrant HMOs
  8. A full register of HMO occupants and identification if they are on any kind of watch / warning list.  


What an Article 4 Direction Would Achieve

The purpose of this petition is not to seek a blanket ban on Houses in Multiple Occupation as we understand HMOs can be used for housing Students etc.


Instead, an Article 4 Direction would mean that within the designated area, a proposed change of use from a dwellinghouse to a small HMO would require a planning application.


This would provide North East Derbyshire District Council with greater ability to consider the individual and cumulative planning impacts of proposed HMOs, including their effect upon residential amenity, the character of the area, parking and other relevant planning considerations.


Applications would continue to be considered individually and determined in accordance with relevant planning policies and material planning considerations.

Our Request

We, the undersigned, therefore call upon North East Derbyshire District Council to formally investigate the case for introducing an Article 4 Direction for Pilsley and, where supported by robust evidence, commence the necessary process to introduce the Direction to provide appropriate planning control over future conversions of dwellinghouses to small HMOs.


We believe this represents a reasonable, proportionate and evidence-based approach to protecting the long-term character, amenity and wellbeing of the Pilsley community.

Updates

Reached 100 supporters

September 6, 2026

59 Comments

J
Janis Rodgers Verified
20 hr ago Featured

Couples who have grown up in the village are wanting to build a life and family in their childhood village and need housing to support them to do so. Locals should have priority of housing, funds should be spent on assisting locals young and old. Additionally the village has always been perceived as a safe community for all age groups and genders, this is and will no longer be the case as more properties become HMO's

P
Paul Kidd Verified
21 hr ago Featured

The first priority for a local government is to create safe living communities for families to thrive. HMO’s do not contribute to this basic need, history has shown they create very unsafe areas, causing distress and actual harm to existing residents.

L
Lynn Ridd Verified
22 hr ago Featured

Our village is a small safe place and doesn’t need HMO in it. It would cause the residents to feel unsafe and worried for their children. As a woman I wouldn’t feel safe. There are a lot of oap’s me being one of them in the community and this idea is frightening

G
Graeme Walker Verified
23 hr ago Featured

Because the safety of women & children in a village environment should be a safe environment and it is not right that HMO's are inflicted upon a small village by a district council deliberately hiding behind legislation designed to keep that local population in the dark.

L
Lucy Verified
23 hr ago Featured

Because a high level of hmo takes away from the character of what is a lovely very safe place to live for women and children..

K
Ken Gumbley Verified
1 min ago

Safety for women and children

J
Jacqui Entwistle-Green Verified
1 hr ago

I want to know who is living on my street and also have a say

S
Sylvia Hopkins Verified
1 hr ago

The safety of PILSLEY occupants must come first I will not walk my dog in the evening to scared to

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.

Your share link

Share directly