Women’s groups should be exactly that, confined to natal born women.
H
Helen Smith
3 years ago
Keep women’s institute for women (adult human females) only. I’ll only join when this happens
P
Patricia Hughes
3 years ago
Featured
There are so few places where women can meet to have discussions on a wide range of issues without males diluting the female perspective. This is vital for democracy, so, no, men should not be let in. I have yet to see a TW say anything a woman would say.
G
Gerry Robinson
3 years ago
Trans women are men!
#Sexnatters
K
Katie Graham
3 years ago
I would like to join but only if the WI stays true to its history and is a group for real women (adult female humans). I’m not looking for a mixed sex group.
D
Diane Dawson
3 years ago
I couldn’t consider joking WI while it includes males however they identify but if you include women however they identify, I would. Please use the exception in EA2010 to clarify that WI is a single sex organisation.
L
Louise Westbrook
3 years ago
I was interested in joining WI however am put off by refusal to allow members not to believe that women is a feeling in a man's head. Its is not.
J
Julia Thomson
3 years ago
I believe the rights of women who are survivors of sexual assault & domestic violence are not being considered by this policy, which has been enacted without consulting membership. A man who identifies as a woman remains a man. There is no way of ensuring predatory men will not exploit the removal of gateways into women’s single sex spaces. Women deserve their own spaces.
J
Jenny O
3 years ago
I’m not a member any longer whilst men (however they identify) can also be members. We need female only groups.
V
Victoria Speirs
3 years ago
Women-only organisations (defined by sex) are legitimate and important
J
Jane
3 years ago
I would be in favour of genuine transsexuals joining but the whole gender nonsense is ludicrous- how do we tell if someone is a transvestite or a trans woman?
K
Kathryn Davies
3 years ago
I have been very uneasy about the stance of NFWI on this issue. I’m glad I am not the only one.
R
Rebecca E
3 years ago
Would love to join the WI but won't until it returns to being an all woman organisation.
R
Rebekah Wershbale
3 years ago
I'd be happier if the existing trans members could be removed too, but it's definitely a solid start
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
Women and girls are a sex class.
Men and boys are the other sex class.
Keep WI 's female sex
E
Elaine Shimmin
3 years ago
'Transwomen' are male.
It would ruin the whole ethos of the WI. Besides, most of them still have male privilage and would tend to take over.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
Trans women are con men
G
Geraldine Curtis
3 years ago
I object to men using WI meetings to indulge their AGP sexual fetish
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
Important that full membership are given opportunity to decide.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
I will not join all the while there are trans identifying men as members
Women’s groups should be exactly that, confined to natal born women.
Keep women’s institute for women (adult human females) only. I’ll only join when this happens
There are so few places where women can meet to have discussions on a wide range of issues without males diluting the female perspective. This is vital for democracy, so, no, men should not be let in. I have yet to see a TW say anything a woman would say.
Trans women are men! #Sexnatters
I would like to join but only if the WI stays true to its history and is a group for real women (adult female humans). I’m not looking for a mixed sex group.
I couldn’t consider joking WI while it includes males however they identify but if you include women however they identify, I would. Please use the exception in EA2010 to clarify that WI is a single sex organisation.
I was interested in joining WI however am put off by refusal to allow members not to believe that women is a feeling in a man's head. Its is not.
I believe the rights of women who are survivors of sexual assault & domestic violence are not being considered by this policy, which has been enacted without consulting membership. A man who identifies as a woman remains a man. There is no way of ensuring predatory men will not exploit the removal of gateways into women’s single sex spaces. Women deserve their own spaces.
I’m not a member any longer whilst men (however they identify) can also be members. We need female only groups.
Women-only organisations (defined by sex) are legitimate and important
I would be in favour of genuine transsexuals joining but the whole gender nonsense is ludicrous- how do we tell if someone is a transvestite or a trans woman?
I have been very uneasy about the stance of NFWI on this issue. I’m glad I am not the only one.
Would love to join the WI but won't until it returns to being an all woman organisation.
I'd be happier if the existing trans members could be removed too, but it's definitely a solid start
Women and girls are a sex class. Men and boys are the other sex class. Keep WI 's female sex
'Transwomen' are male. It would ruin the whole ethos of the WI. Besides, most of them still have male privilage and would tend to take over.
Trans women are con men
I object to men using WI meetings to indulge their AGP sexual fetish
Important that full membership are given opportunity to decide.
I will not join all the while there are trans identifying men as members