I heard creon this lawyer. He has questions, can anyone answer these?
Bob,
Regarding the development we spoke about this morning, what do you see as the main bases for stopping the development? Are you aware of any procedure that the developer and/or the city should have followed but failed to follow? Are you aware of any substantive legal requirements that are not met by the proposed development and the inadequate roads?
If you had to put your finger on what the city is doing wrong, what would be the main thing you would say?
Thanks,
Grant M. Sumsion
Sumsion Steele & Crandall
545 E. University Parkway, Suite 200
Orem, Utah 84097
Ph: (801) 426-6888
V
Vickie Miller
7 years ago
Please NO!
L
Lindsey Noyce
7 years ago
This should have been turned into a public park for the community years ago. Don't rezone it for 168 cramped houses, do what was promised and make it a park for families to use.
B
Brent Cook
7 years ago
The South Jordan City web page talks about the "country feel" of the city. I can't envision how this development supports that vision. The last thing South Jordan needs is more roof tops and asphalt. SLCC should do its part to clean the Wasatch air shed and convert this land into the green space it promised all those years ago. Give us a public park within walking distance of the existing communities.
J
Justin Noyce
7 years ago
This is a terrible idea. The infrastructure can't handle that amount of traffic.
J
JARON NOYCE
7 years ago
This is absolutely ridiculous. The infrastructure can't handle this and it will cause so many problems. The original master plan should be followed. They should build a park as promised.
N
Nathan Ryan Noyce
7 years ago
Featured
This is really shady and dishonest. And the due diligence notifying us in the neighborhood was pathetic. This was supposed to be a park. The streets can't handle the traffic from such a development. The road is bad enough as it is for kids crossing to the elementary school.
S
Steve Ferguson
7 years ago
"At the very least I would like to see the developer abandon the planned 20 homes adjacent to 3400 west and provide a public park with amenities found in so many other local community parks in our area for the use of our local residents."
J
Joni Erin
7 years ago
I believe that these 55+ senior housing developments are needed and have a place in in South Jordan, but PLEASE - South Jordan City Council- these kind of developments need to have the infrastructure in place to support them. THIS property does NOT fit that definition. I am convinced this is disaster waiting to happen - dangerous for our children, pedestrians, and existing residents. I have heard NOTHING in the way of suggestions to solve the limited entry/egress points- unless you view quiet neighborhoods as major thoroughfares. I cannot see any possible solutions and vote NO to the re-zoning question.
M
Mike Nelson
7 years ago
Open space was why we moved to South Jordan please don't let this happen we have more than enough high density projects that already should never have been in place. Put in the park as planned. Be nice if our elected official would start supporting the people instead of the money
N
Nickolas Blank
7 years ago
The land is meant for public use. Changing this and adding a high density neighborhood will put a burden on the roads surrounding it which they were not designed to handle.
J
Joanie ward
7 years ago
Why do we need MORE senior housing!
D
Dianne Burton
7 years ago
I oppose any housing being built on the subject property. Our neighborhood wasn't designed to absorb and can't absorb the added traffic.
E
Ethan winterbottom
7 years ago
Having a quadplex in this are would be a terrible idea considering how many people are already here
K
Kelly Hopkins
7 years ago
A city’s zoning regulations form a pact with its neighborhoods. That pact has an ethical component. It is a kind of promise to maintain the livability of that neighborhood for those who invest their savings in homes there. What ethical component will South Jordan Leaders bring to the table? This project is going to spill cars into surrounding neighborhoods, and there is no clear plan as to how the city intends to protect neighborhood livability. Based on this I strongly oppose letting a developer and the city change what I love about where I live. I plan on living in my lovely little house with a descent size yard for may more years to come long after the developers and the current city council are gone.
C
Craig Richardson
7 years ago
3400 West can not handle this traffic and diverting traffic through Hearthstone is not acceptable. There are enough multi family homes in South Jordan already
J
Jessica Copier
7 years ago
Can’t we have ANY open space anymore? Does everything have to be developed? And do the openers of this land want to sell? If not, this seems like an unfair condemnation of property!
C
Camille Bryan
7 years ago
Utah State has no good sense of planning.
K
Karen Denning
7 years ago
Absolutely dangerous for our school children to have that many cars going in and out of the neighborhood....far too many residences for such a small space.
I heard creon this lawyer. He has questions, can anyone answer these? Bob, Regarding the development we spoke about this morning, what do you see as the main bases for stopping the development? Are you aware of any procedure that the developer and/or the city should have followed but failed to follow? Are you aware of any substantive legal requirements that are not met by the proposed development and the inadequate roads? If you had to put your finger on what the city is doing wrong, what would be the main thing you would say? Thanks, Grant M. Sumsion Sumsion Steele & Crandall 545 E. University Parkway, Suite 200 Orem, Utah 84097 Ph: (801) 426-6888
Please NO!
This should have been turned into a public park for the community years ago. Don't rezone it for 168 cramped houses, do what was promised and make it a park for families to use.
The South Jordan City web page talks about the "country feel" of the city. I can't envision how this development supports that vision. The last thing South Jordan needs is more roof tops and asphalt. SLCC should do its part to clean the Wasatch air shed and convert this land into the green space it promised all those years ago. Give us a public park within walking distance of the existing communities.
This is a terrible idea. The infrastructure can't handle that amount of traffic.
This is absolutely ridiculous. The infrastructure can't handle this and it will cause so many problems. The original master plan should be followed. They should build a park as promised.
This is really shady and dishonest. And the due diligence notifying us in the neighborhood was pathetic. This was supposed to be a park. The streets can't handle the traffic from such a development. The road is bad enough as it is for kids crossing to the elementary school.
"At the very least I would like to see the developer abandon the planned 20 homes adjacent to 3400 west and provide a public park with amenities found in so many other local community parks in our area for the use of our local residents."
I believe that these 55+ senior housing developments are needed and have a place in in South Jordan, but PLEASE - South Jordan City Council- these kind of developments need to have the infrastructure in place to support them. THIS property does NOT fit that definition. I am convinced this is disaster waiting to happen - dangerous for our children, pedestrians, and existing residents. I have heard NOTHING in the way of suggestions to solve the limited entry/egress points- unless you view quiet neighborhoods as major thoroughfares. I cannot see any possible solutions and vote NO to the re-zoning question.
Open space was why we moved to South Jordan please don't let this happen we have more than enough high density projects that already should never have been in place. Put in the park as planned. Be nice if our elected official would start supporting the people instead of the money
The land is meant for public use. Changing this and adding a high density neighborhood will put a burden on the roads surrounding it which they were not designed to handle.
Why do we need MORE senior housing!
I oppose any housing being built on the subject property. Our neighborhood wasn't designed to absorb and can't absorb the added traffic.
Having a quadplex in this are would be a terrible idea considering how many people are already here
A city’s zoning regulations form a pact with its neighborhoods. That pact has an ethical component. It is a kind of promise to maintain the livability of that neighborhood for those who invest their savings in homes there. What ethical component will South Jordan Leaders bring to the table? This project is going to spill cars into surrounding neighborhoods, and there is no clear plan as to how the city intends to protect neighborhood livability. Based on this I strongly oppose letting a developer and the city change what I love about where I live. I plan on living in my lovely little house with a descent size yard for may more years to come long after the developers and the current city council are gone.
3400 West can not handle this traffic and diverting traffic through Hearthstone is not acceptable. There are enough multi family homes in South Jordan already
Can’t we have ANY open space anymore? Does everything have to be developed? And do the openers of this land want to sell? If not, this seems like an unfair condemnation of property!
Utah State has no good sense of planning.
Absolutely dangerous for our school children to have that many cars going in and out of the neighborhood....far too many residences for such a small space.
I am opposed to the re-zoning.