This new SCGOP rule clearly is unconstitutional and discriminatory. Ms. Carroll should be seated immediately!
S
Sandra Floyd
2 years ago
Another 'election' where the choices of the people are ignored.
T
Tara Palubicki
3 years ago
Election Integrity
A
Ana Maria Blevins
3 years ago
We support Cryste Carroll.
J
Janis Price
3 years ago
I do not support this ex post facto rule.
S
Sheri Irwin
3 years ago
She was elected overwhelmingly. She needs to be reinstated.
Thank you
C
Charles Ostrowski
3 years ago
Mrs. Carroll absolutely MUST be reinstated to the EC position that she legitimately won... as far as the voting "history", thousands of people's voting history information is full of discrepancies !!... Give the people Cryste Carroll !!
J
Jackie OHara
3 years ago
Chryste needs to be returned to her duly elected position immediately!
N
Nancy Warner
3 years ago
Based on the fact the voter rolls have significant errors in them, there is no way to trust any records on voter history either. She was duly elected by the people.
D
Deborah Barton
3 years ago
Cryste Carrol was duly elected for State ECfor Charleston County with 55% of the vote, BY THE PEOPLE… The voting history that the SCGOP required, is full of errors, as is my own— go by WHO “the people” want, and WHO the majority of people voted for !!… PLEASE !!
K
Kristina Smith
3 years ago
I am in Dorchester County and support Crystel Carroll in taking her duly elected seat as the CCGOP State Executive Committeeman.
H
Heather Hickman
3 years ago
Featured
I support Cryste Carroll and free and fair elections, especially when it comes to light that other State ECs did not qualify, yet remain.
D
David Guttman
3 years ago
Who is the problem? She should’ve been vetted by the republican party. She wasn’t . We elected her. She should serve!
M
Minnie Britt
3 years ago
I am voting a 2nd time for Chryste Carroll because the RINOs didn't like the results of the 1st election. Guess they can't beat us in honest elections. Why? We are the MAJORITY, Stupid.
N
Nikki Lang
3 years ago
She should absolutely have the right to appeal.
J
Joseph Harkins Jr
3 years ago
This is an absolute disgrace as was the 'selection' of the Chair!
C
carol baker
3 years ago
St Andrew’s 5
J
Janelle Downs
3 years ago
This situation needs to get squared away. Determining after the election that she was not qualified is an obvious indicator of bigger problems in the voting system. I stand by my vote for Cryste. She is qualified.
K
Keith Blamdford
3 years ago
This needs to be resolved. We cannot move forward with anything as long as the RINO still exist.
Honest elections!
This new SCGOP rule clearly is unconstitutional and discriminatory. Ms. Carroll should be seated immediately!
Another 'election' where the choices of the people are ignored.
Election Integrity
We support Cryste Carroll.
I do not support this ex post facto rule.
She was elected overwhelmingly. She needs to be reinstated. Thank you
Mrs. Carroll absolutely MUST be reinstated to the EC position that she legitimately won... as far as the voting "history", thousands of people's voting history information is full of discrepancies !!... Give the people Cryste Carroll !!
Chryste needs to be returned to her duly elected position immediately!
Based on the fact the voter rolls have significant errors in them, there is no way to trust any records on voter history either. She was duly elected by the people.
Cryste Carrol was duly elected for State ECfor Charleston County with 55% of the vote, BY THE PEOPLE… The voting history that the SCGOP required, is full of errors, as is my own— go by WHO “the people” want, and WHO the majority of people voted for !!… PLEASE !!
I am in Dorchester County and support Crystel Carroll in taking her duly elected seat as the CCGOP State Executive Committeeman.
I support Cryste Carroll and free and fair elections, especially when it comes to light that other State ECs did not qualify, yet remain.
Who is the problem? She should’ve been vetted by the republican party. She wasn’t . We elected her. She should serve!
I am voting a 2nd time for Chryste Carroll because the RINOs didn't like the results of the 1st election. Guess they can't beat us in honest elections. Why? We are the MAJORITY, Stupid.
She should absolutely have the right to appeal.
This is an absolute disgrace as was the 'selection' of the Chair!
St Andrew’s 5
This situation needs to get squared away. Determining after the election that she was not qualified is an obvious indicator of bigger problems in the voting system. I stand by my vote for Cryste. She is qualified.
This needs to be resolved. We cannot move forward with anything as long as the RINO still exist.