Aspects of this plan pit membership against each other--old vs. young, golfers vs.tennis, etc. That is not a good way to embark on a multi-year endeavor. I oppose the plan in its current state. Let's wait until we have far more cash on hand before tackling a plan of this magnitude.
C
CLIFF BENSON JR
12 years ago
NO TO LONG RANGE PLAN
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
I don't support the plan as it is currently.
P
philip c hoft
12 years ago
we do not need to take on this debt in this economy with our current membership. If we keep going our kids will not be able to afford membership.
C
Carey Brent Rice
12 years ago
Thank you for the hard work, I oppose the long range plan.
C
Caroline Luckett
12 years ago
Club is a lovely facility as is...
J
Joanie Hutson
12 years ago
We thank the board for their hard work, but we respectively oppose the Long Range Plan.
H
Howard Brooks
12 years ago
Although the long term plan looks good on paper it seems very ambitious and more than what we need relative to the size of our club and facility limitations.
V
Vann Russell
12 years ago
I am appreciative of all the boards work thus far, but I have concerns over the timing and the long term costs vs benefits of this plan.
J
Johnny McConnell
12 years ago
Featured
I appreciate all the work of the LRC, I just dont think a majoirty of the members support the plan in its current form. I think given some more time and planning there could be some common middle ground that most members could support.
R
Robert Newcomb
12 years ago
I am opposed to the major aspects of the long range plan but do agree with a few of the smaller items that do not add to the current footprint of the Club.
K
kevin mcnamara
12 years ago
like certain parts of the proposal but too much to take on at one time as it reads now
C
Charles Zevenhuizen
12 years ago
I echo the comments of many of my fellow members. While i tink parts of the plan are feasible, I can not support the LRP as written
S
Spears Mullen
12 years ago
At this point, I do not have confidence that a plan like this would work as advertised nor am I convinced that such a grand and expensive plan is needed.
M
Melissa Black
12 years ago
I support some updates but not the full long range plan
M
Martha Marshall
12 years ago
I also are only interested in one part of this plan, Would like and think we need indoor tennis courts for all our members young and old. Also, not interested in a HUge Bar area that cost tons of money to build.
P
Patricia Phoenix
12 years ago
I only want 1 part of the plan and agree with others we need to make what we have the best it can be.
J
John Church
12 years ago
No
L
Lynn Pearce
12 years ago
Jack Slaughter is trying to make CCC a club that we don't want. Is this for his resume?
I oppose the plan
Aspects of this plan pit membership against each other--old vs. young, golfers vs.tennis, etc. That is not a good way to embark on a multi-year endeavor. I oppose the plan in its current state. Let's wait until we have far more cash on hand before tackling a plan of this magnitude.
NO TO LONG RANGE PLAN
I don't support the plan as it is currently.
we do not need to take on this debt in this economy with our current membership. If we keep going our kids will not be able to afford membership.
Thank you for the hard work, I oppose the long range plan.
Club is a lovely facility as is...
We thank the board for their hard work, but we respectively oppose the Long Range Plan.
Although the long term plan looks good on paper it seems very ambitious and more than what we need relative to the size of our club and facility limitations.
I am appreciative of all the boards work thus far, but I have concerns over the timing and the long term costs vs benefits of this plan.
I appreciate all the work of the LRC, I just dont think a majoirty of the members support the plan in its current form. I think given some more time and planning there could be some common middle ground that most members could support.
I am opposed to the major aspects of the long range plan but do agree with a few of the smaller items that do not add to the current footprint of the Club.
like certain parts of the proposal but too much to take on at one time as it reads now
I echo the comments of many of my fellow members. While i tink parts of the plan are feasible, I can not support the LRP as written
At this point, I do not have confidence that a plan like this would work as advertised nor am I convinced that such a grand and expensive plan is needed.
I support some updates but not the full long range plan
I also are only interested in one part of this plan, Would like and think we need indoor tennis courts for all our members young and old. Also, not interested in a HUge Bar area that cost tons of money to build.
I only want 1 part of the plan and agree with others we need to make what we have the best it can be.
No
Jack Slaughter is trying to make CCC a club that we don't want. Is this for his resume?