Skip to main content

Vote No - Sigwalt Apartments, 11 Variances Too Many

76 Comments

A
Anonymous
7 years ago

I have a huge concern over the amount of units proposed. As mentioned in many comments, there are already so many rental options, now this would add 80 more apartments? Also, the low-income aspect is concerning. I want my kids to feel safe in our neighborhood. That is why we live here. Vote No to this and provide a better solution such as single family homes or green space.

K
Katie Cox
7 years ago

We do not agree that this project fits the needs of the AH residents and further believe the design is not appropriate for the neighborhood. The largest impact on the community will be the low income housing aspect. The residents are not being fully informed on what impact this has in our schools and neighborhoods.

E
Elizabeth Broemmelsiek
7 years ago

No

S
Steve Weirich
7 years ago

Special treatment should not be granted for short term gratification. That’s what most politicians engage in. Compromise the future for short term results. It’s pathetic.

B
Beth Razook
7 years ago

I am for building across the street but why not do a project that meets code? The rules and codes were put in place for a reason. So inflexible for the project for the other half of the property but this developer can get whatever they want for max profit? That’s wrong and horrible City planning. Vote out these trustees then if they have no consideration for those of us that were pioneers in Dtah starting almost 20 years ago now.

K
Kelly Petersen
7 years ago

Town homes or more single family homes would fit better in that area!

A
Alex Bell
8 years ago

Too many apartment buildings in Arlington Heights already. Townhomes would be preferred.

T
Timothy Martin
8 years ago

Would like to see the land developed, but prefer townhouses or condos. Also, very large variance that other properties are unable to receive.

M
Mike Ludy
8 years ago

Would prefer townhomes over an apartment building.

B
Beth Martin
8 years ago

I agree something needs to be done with this land, but not over priced apartments that would receive a larger variance than every other property in the neighborhood.

B
Ben Olson
8 years ago

Make the project fits the zoning regulations that exist, or wait for a builder and project that will.

M
Michael Voss
8 years ago

I agree.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

80 units is too many

M
Mark Nebel
8 years ago

Too big for that lot, especially with it being so close to single family homes. Town/Row homes would be much better.

C
Carol Campbell
8 years ago Featured

Please do not build this monstrosity, and poor quality building. Smalet multi family structures are more in line with the vibe in that area. I lived in a brownstone building at 193 S Evergreen Ave for 5 years. Many many times I was asked by people walking by if there were any units for sale. We easily sold it when we transitioned back to single family!

J
Jennifer Campbell
8 years ago

Please vote no - way too big

P
Peter Knowles
8 years ago

RE-design so it meets the guidelines

M
Michelle Lewis
8 years ago

It appears the developer is spending ad money to promote their counter petition while making it look like it is just a resident doing so. I do not think this is good business practice and am now strongly doubtful of the integrity of this developer.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

Please vote no

C
Cathy Shanahan
8 years ago

This building is an eyesore, excessive and breaking rules of building codes. AH absolutely does not need anymore apartment building, we need more green space. Build a park instead.