USS: commit to no vote on scheme changes on 15 January 2015
293 Comments
S
Susanne
11 years ago
Please keep our pensions!
E
Esther Rodriguez-Villegas
11 years ago
Imperial College london
E
Esther Rodriguez-Villegas
11 years ago
Imperial College london
M
Matthew Malek
11 years ago
The petition says it all. With no proof of a problem, why are we being asked to sacrifice our pensions?
M
Matthew Malek
11 years ago
The petition says it all. With no proof of a problem, why are we being asked to sacrifice our pensions?
H
Huw Williams
11 years ago
Imperial college
H
Huw Williams
11 years ago
Imperial college
M
margaret c
11 years ago
I believe this is the 2nd stage of a 3 stage process and that the 3rd stage will be to close any defined benefit element and move eveyone into a purely defined contribution scheme, accomplishing the aim of shifting the risk and cost of the scheme onto individual members. USS proposed changes are politically driven and without a true financial justfication.
D
Derek Lee
11 years ago
Imperial College London
D
Derek Lee
11 years ago
Imperial College London
D
Dr DL Clements
11 years ago
Until there is agreement on the valuation there can be no changes to pensions
S
Steffen Gielen
11 years ago
Marie Curie Fellow, Imperial College
S
Steffen Gielen
11 years ago
Marie Curie Fellow, Imperial College
M
Michael McGarvey
11 years ago
There is no objective evidence that the proposed changes are justified as they are based on a flawed valuation of the pension fund
F
Fay Dowker
11 years ago
UUK have no credible argument for their proposed cuts
Please keep our pensions!
Imperial College london
Imperial College london
The petition says it all. With no proof of a problem, why are we being asked to sacrifice our pensions?
The petition says it all. With no proof of a problem, why are we being asked to sacrifice our pensions?
Imperial college
Imperial college
I believe this is the 2nd stage of a 3 stage process and that the 3rd stage will be to close any defined benefit element and move eveyone into a purely defined contribution scheme, accomplishing the aim of shifting the risk and cost of the scheme onto individual members. USS proposed changes are politically driven and without a true financial justfication.
Imperial College London
Imperial College London
Until there is agreement on the valuation there can be no changes to pensions
Marie Curie Fellow, Imperial College
Marie Curie Fellow, Imperial College
There is no objective evidence that the proposed changes are justified as they are based on a flawed valuation of the pension fund
UUK have no credible argument for their proposed cuts
University of Birmingham
University of Birmingham
Durham University
Durham University
We need reliable data before anything is agreed