Skip to main content

USS: commit to no vote on scheme changes on 15 January 2015

293 Comments

L
Liping Xu
11 years ago

Agree that all stakeholders need more discussions, Important issues as such cannot be rushed through to a decision. Cambridge

W
Will Graham
11 years ago

Major changes such as those proposed shouldn't be implemented in a rush, particularly as we're talking about issues that will only play out over generations. At present, it feels as though USS/UUK are trying to bounce the members into acceptance without proper discussion. Cambridge

D
Dr Michael Marten
11 years ago

University of Stirling

D
Dr Michael Marten
11 years ago

University of Stirling

J
J. P. E. Harper-Scott
11 years ago

Royal Holloway, University of London

J
J. P. E. Harper-Scott
11 years ago

Royal Holloway, University of London

U
Uday Reddy
11 years ago

University of Birmingham

U
Uday Reddy
11 years ago

University of Birmingham

N
Naranker Dulay
11 years ago

Imperial College London

N
Naranker Dulay
11 years ago

Imperial College London

R
Richard Dearden
11 years ago

University of Birmingham (ex)

R
Richard Dearden
11 years ago

University of Birmingham (ex)

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

University of Oxford

T
Tom Melham
11 years ago

University of Oxford

A
Achim Jung
11 years ago

University of Birmingham

A
Achim Jung
11 years ago

University of Birmingham

S
Stefan Kiefer
11 years ago

University of Oxford

S
Stefan Kiefer
11 years ago

University of Oxford

A
Andrew Simpson
11 years ago

University of Oxford

A
Andrew Simpson
11 years ago

University of Oxford