Tony Bellew Vs. Nathan Cleverly II should not be PPV!
118 Comments
M
Martin Slack
11 years ago
I pay £120 a month for my sky and will be cancelling my subscription asap.
M
Martin Slack
11 years ago
I pay £120 a month for my sky and will be cancelling my subscription asap.
L
lee green
11 years ago
I think this is the final straw for many, pointless having Sky if the allow this to happen, hardly top draw fight
L
lee green
11 years ago
I think this is the final straw for many, pointless having Sky if the allow this to happen, hardly top draw fight
J
Joseph King
11 years ago
Boxing's demise continues - no wonder it's a minority sport these days. I pay Sky nearly £100 a month so don't expect to pay £17 to watch domestic boxing on top. Will be cancelling Sky Sports over this as I've had enough.
M
Matthew Williams
11 years ago
A total joke, 2 men destroyed in their respective world title fights face of on PPV? Surely no-one will stump up £15 for a domestic dust up, what next Joshua on PPV for his potential British title fight?
M
Matthew Williams
11 years ago
A total joke, 2 men destroyed in their respective world title fights face of on PPV? Surely no-one will stump up £15 for a domestic dust up, what next Joshua on PPV for his potential British title fight?
B
Brian Olive
11 years ago
This is a piss take. These two "Box Office" fighters were arguing like little girls on Ringside about who is better out of the 2 guys that wiped the floor with them! So basically their collective bragging rights amount to being totally out of their depth at world level. Piss off Matchroom!
B
Brian Olive
11 years ago
This is a piss take. These two "Box Office" fighters were arguing like little girls on Ringside about who is better out of the 2 guys that wiped the floor with them! So basically their collective bragging rights amount to being totally out of their depth at world level. Piss off Matchroom!
T
T Heaney
11 years ago
Really not happy about this pay per view fight, sky subscribers pay enough as it is without being asked to pay more for this fight. I feel that it is just another attempt to make money for Eddie Hearn and his company who seem now to have a monopoly on sky sports boxing. I am a subscriber to Boxnation which is excellent value for money unlike this rip off.
T
T Heaney
11 years ago
Really not happy about this pay per view fight, sky subscribers pay enough as it is without being asked to pay more for this fight. I feel that it is just another attempt to make money for Eddie Hearn and his company who seem now to have a monopoly on sky sports boxing. I am a subscriber to Boxnation which is excellent value for money unlike this rip off.
D
Danny
11 years ago
We already pay £30 pm for sky sports,furthermore this is two domestic fighters with no world titles between them.
R
Robbie Middleton
11 years ago
fucking stitch up, skysports is expensive enough this should be on normal sky sports channel
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Greed!
C
Craig sansom
11 years ago
Box office ? Really ? What am I paying sky for these days ? £82 a month and then try to fleece us for £17 for this domestic bout of no real importance .
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Don't get greedy Matchroom...Froch Groves was a PPV fight, Cleverly Bellew certainly isn't
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Featured
im absolutley disgusted at this,every decent fight gets ppv,why should i pay more to my sky when i already pay £100+ a month? its not on when the premier league costs sky tv the most out of all the sports on tv but sky dont charge extra for it. if this fight goes ahead on ppv im cancelling my subscription to sky tv as a whole.
S
simon ivekich
11 years ago
As a subscriber to sky sports, with boxing being my main sport I am shocked this has been announced as ppv! It begs the question what am I actually paying for when im asked to stump up extra money for what is basically just a domestic fight. don't get me wrong I do think it will be a good scrap but not worthy of ppv. ive just sacked off boxnation for taking advantage and not showing enough top quality fights and will do the same with sky if it carries this out.
J
JB
11 years ago
There are champions fighting on the same bill playing second fiddle to two lads ho are good, but have been found wanting at the top level.
T
Tim Prest
11 years ago
This fight is not PPV worthy and therefore should be available for all with a Sky Sports subscription. PPV money is not required to finance this fight and on that basis the decision should be reversed.
I pay £120 a month for my sky and will be cancelling my subscription asap.
I pay £120 a month for my sky and will be cancelling my subscription asap.
I think this is the final straw for many, pointless having Sky if the allow this to happen, hardly top draw fight
I think this is the final straw for many, pointless having Sky if the allow this to happen, hardly top draw fight
Boxing's demise continues - no wonder it's a minority sport these days. I pay Sky nearly £100 a month so don't expect to pay £17 to watch domestic boxing on top. Will be cancelling Sky Sports over this as I've had enough.
A total joke, 2 men destroyed in their respective world title fights face of on PPV? Surely no-one will stump up £15 for a domestic dust up, what next Joshua on PPV for his potential British title fight?
A total joke, 2 men destroyed in their respective world title fights face of on PPV? Surely no-one will stump up £15 for a domestic dust up, what next Joshua on PPV for his potential British title fight?
This is a piss take. These two "Box Office" fighters were arguing like little girls on Ringside about who is better out of the 2 guys that wiped the floor with them! So basically their collective bragging rights amount to being totally out of their depth at world level. Piss off Matchroom!
This is a piss take. These two "Box Office" fighters were arguing like little girls on Ringside about who is better out of the 2 guys that wiped the floor with them! So basically their collective bragging rights amount to being totally out of their depth at world level. Piss off Matchroom!
Really not happy about this pay per view fight, sky subscribers pay enough as it is without being asked to pay more for this fight. I feel that it is just another attempt to make money for Eddie Hearn and his company who seem now to have a monopoly on sky sports boxing. I am a subscriber to Boxnation which is excellent value for money unlike this rip off.
Really not happy about this pay per view fight, sky subscribers pay enough as it is without being asked to pay more for this fight. I feel that it is just another attempt to make money for Eddie Hearn and his company who seem now to have a monopoly on sky sports boxing. I am a subscriber to Boxnation which is excellent value for money unlike this rip off.
We already pay £30 pm for sky sports,furthermore this is two domestic fighters with no world titles between them.
fucking stitch up, skysports is expensive enough this should be on normal sky sports channel
Greed!
Box office ? Really ? What am I paying sky for these days ? £82 a month and then try to fleece us for £17 for this domestic bout of no real importance .
Don't get greedy Matchroom...Froch Groves was a PPV fight, Cleverly Bellew certainly isn't
im absolutley disgusted at this,every decent fight gets ppv,why should i pay more to my sky when i already pay £100+ a month? its not on when the premier league costs sky tv the most out of all the sports on tv but sky dont charge extra for it. if this fight goes ahead on ppv im cancelling my subscription to sky tv as a whole.
As a subscriber to sky sports, with boxing being my main sport I am shocked this has been announced as ppv! It begs the question what am I actually paying for when im asked to stump up extra money for what is basically just a domestic fight. don't get me wrong I do think it will be a good scrap but not worthy of ppv. ive just sacked off boxnation for taking advantage and not showing enough top quality fights and will do the same with sky if it carries this out.
There are champions fighting on the same bill playing second fiddle to two lads ho are good, but have been found wanting at the top level.
This fight is not PPV worthy and therefore should be available for all with a Sky Sports subscription. PPV money is not required to finance this fight and on that basis the decision should be reversed.