Skip to main content

Tony Bellew Vs. Nathan Cleverly II should not be PPV!

118 Comments

J
Jules
11 years ago

Ill be blowing Sky out all together if this PPV goes ahead,absolute disgrace and a real kick in the teeth to working class struggling subscribers.

P
Paul S
11 years ago Featured

This is not a PPV level fight. It's a good one, but neither boxer is in a position to justify PPV. I buy Sky Sports ONLY for the boxing and am considering leaving.

S
Sean Stephenson
11 years ago

Sheep shagger vs Bin Dipper.. No thanks

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

decent fight but come on..........no way PPV

M
Matt Black
11 years ago

Eddie Hearn claims to be a boxing fan, not so in my opinion...how can he justify mugging off real fight fans with this nonsensical and greedy business opportunity. I don't attend his shows and I certainly won't be purchasing this poor excuse for a PPV event. My contract with sky will definitely be curtailed, in light of this. BoxNation is the future !...Three years of great fights and great value and going from strength to strength.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

No f****** way is this a PPV fight on top of the £50 a month we already fork out. Sort it or lose subscribers in their droves!

J
Jamal Umaji
11 years ago

There is only one 50/50 match up on this card. The boxnation card has four 50/50 matches and is not PPV. I will be conacelling Sky Sports shortly.

D
Darren Hanney
11 years ago

This isn't a PPV fight in a million years.

S
Sean Rigby
11 years ago

SORT.IT.OUT!

S
Sean Laverick
11 years ago

Shocking paying for this. More promoters shows need to be on sky not just one man dictating it.

A
Andy Jerome-Seager
11 years ago Featured

This ridiculous that a show of this quality of profile should be made a pay per view; I would expect a show of such quality to be a regular on Sky Fight Night. I shall be cancelling my sky sports subscription shortly as the number of competitive boxing matches on Sky Sports has been very low.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Disgrace

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Not remotely worthy of PPV absolute con job.

R
Robin Williamson
11 years ago

This will be the first time I have not purchased a sky PPV fight since Bruno v Tyson 2. This fight is an exciting domestic fight but certainly not PPV.

M
Matt Saul
11 years ago

which was the last PPV fight with no titles on the line? and what have either of these two done to be classed as PP fighters?

G
gavin colsey-nicholls
11 years ago

totally mugging sky viewers off by making loyal fans pay for this. Ill watch it on a stream. if this is worthy of PPV god knows what will be next…. WarringtonvsSelby??Callum SmithvsGroves?? campbellvscoyle, Do me a favour. Unsubscribing.

F
Frank Warren
11 years ago

I PROMOTED THIS 3 YEARS AGO AND HEARN WANTS THIS ON SKY PPV!

K
Kearo1981
11 years ago

Save pay per view for fights and fighters who deserve it. Who's pockets are we really filling with our pounds??""

S
Steven Cinderey
11 years ago

domestic fight, nowhere near worthy of PPV

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

joke