Skip to main content

​The Quality of Life for the Neighborhoods Along Church Road is at Risk​

280 Comments

S
Saundra Jackson
2 years ago

If you are trying to raise money for the lawyer and legal agendas, there should be the ability to give on this site. Just a suggestion.

J
jon white
4 years ago

Right on✊

D
Denise Brown
4 years ago

I too know that pg doesn’t need any more townhouse build for the next 10years

A
Anonymous
6 years ago Featured

Why would they want to put more projects in this area increasing the population, do they not think about schools ? Bowie high school is already packed and students can barely fit in one class room, they squeeze 40 kids in a classroom and now they want to add more ?

S
Sandra Melgar
6 years ago

NO

D
David Oni
6 years ago

Petition to preserve quality of life in church road Bowie. Please council members we beg for your understanding in this regard because our lifes are involved in this situation.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

I concur building a ice arena is a terrible idea on church rd. A total waste of money. 1. Traffic 2. Ice Arena are extinct. 3. Cost

S
Suzanne Janney
6 years ago

We need something to be done about the traffic here. It is outrageous that about 95% of cars speed here. It often takes me 10-15 minutes to pull out onto church rd.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Church Road already is a problem with aggressive drivers and speeders and kids getting killed. Adding more housing without a plan to deal with the traffic (let alone schools!) is irresponsible.

V
Vicky Grochola
6 years ago

This is ludicrous. There isn’t any traffic control now. So let’s add more. Insane. How many more lives need to be lost. Who’s benefiting from this?

D
Dennis Alarcon
6 years ago

I say no to all this!!

D
Donald L and Melissa A Richardson
6 years ago

We are against ANY townhome development. We will support the development of single family homes if homes are no more than 1 home per 1.5 to 2 acres lots. Church Rd cannot accommodate more traffic if high density townhomes are built. In addition it is a safety issue. Look at records to prove it. We are tired of increased taxes, eroding services, lower home values, poor quality schools, lack of enough schools, insufficient citizen focused law enforcement, low end amenities, lack of high paying jobs, politicians cozing up to developers at our economic and social wellbeing and a disregard for what the tax paying citizens desire. If you move on this, we will work overtime to expose you and ensure that you will not be reelected. Smart development equal high quality of life. We do not want the "sardine lifestyle" of Montgomery County and Northern Va where both workday and non-workday traffic are unbearable. This is why we did not move to those areas when we were looking to buy a home. Do not emulate them. They are not good models for quality of life and peace.

J
Jorge Rivera
6 years ago

20720.

R
ROBERT CORT
6 years ago

I do not agree with over developing church rd we do not have the Infrastructure to support this type of development.

P
Patricia Moorman
6 years ago

It’s there anyway to investigate the bank accounts of the council members that voted yes to see how much incentive they received for their vote?

R
Ronnie Slaughter
6 years ago

The county still has not to this day addressed the traffic issues with Church Rd and now you want to add another 1200+ vehicles (2 vehicles per home minimum). How many more people need to lose their life on this road. The lighting is inadequate from the Masonic lodge towards old 450/Annapolis rd. No sidewalks from the lodge towards old 450 Annapolis rd. Pedestrians walk on the shoulder from the Masonic lodge neighborhood. People still have no idea how negotiate the left turn into Fairwood East and West where one of our beloved youth from Fairwood was killed while jogging. Also let's not forget the new ice skating arena to be built @ Rt. 50 and Church rd. Adding yet another couple of hundred cars.... The time to act like the adults we are supposed to be is NOW! If the Developer wants it this bad let's make him apart of the solution and they can fund the needed safety items BEFORE any construction begins.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

20720. We are nearly next door to these proposed property developments. The current airport traffic flyovers already gives us pause. The reduction in land and space for the wildlife is evident, where almost everyday there is a deer or other wildlife found dead from vehicle contact on the Church Street roadway. With these developments we’ll find them in our backyards, and becoming an even greater risk to our children. Moreover as traffic increases so does the need for more traffic calming means. The thorough fare already does not sufficient sidewalks, stop signs or signals for the pedestrians to walk along this roadway. It was an unfortunate result that a sweet child had to die for authorities to take some notice. Which in my opinion was short lived because the “slow” signs came down, the police presence left and it was back to speed business for those who drive though this roadway trying to get to connected street. Heavier traffic and congested development will undoubtedly yield increased casualties. We oppose this bill and any further amendments. Our vote is NO.

C
Chris Reese
6 years ago

20720

J
Janine Gutierrez
6 years ago

Limit over development!

R
Robert Collier
6 years ago

No justification for a zoning change except pure greed. Sell your property zoned the way it was purchased.