Skip to main content

The Future of Country Club Drive

289 Comments

N
NANCY BRITTLE
4 years ago

Please vote no to this project. Too dense, too tall, unsafe for pedestrians, not compatible with surrounding neighborhoods

K
Kathleen Hancock
4 years ago Featured

MAINTAIN THE CURRENT R5 ZONING. I fully support affordable housing in Blacksburg and agree that the property at South Main and Country Club is a good location for affordable housing that MEETS THE CURRENT ZONING REQUIREMENTS.

J
Javad Torabinejad
4 years ago

I'm all for affordable housing but the Legacy on South Main development, in spite of all the positive points, is massive and out of place (does not fit the neighborhood). CHP can do a much better job. Let's respect the neighbors. And for the members of the Town Council, it's best to reject this rezoning if the Comprehensive Plan has any merit at all.

G
Greg Jenkins
4 years ago

This development is too dense.

C
Coleman Brittle
4 years ago

There is no way a developer should ever be granted 4 variances in zoning for one project. If granting this many variances there is no grounds to deny any project going forward.

S
sherri phipps
4 years ago

no

M
Malcolm Laing
4 years ago

Affordable and subsidized housing can be R5. Could the town or others help subsidized the project to keep R5 density and provide affordable housing?

S
Susan T Ledford
4 years ago

Please keep the current R-5 zoning

R
Reinhard Beatty
4 years ago

Not safe, not attractive.

C
Cliv Cranwell
4 years ago

Good idea but wrong location.

L
Lisa Lipsey
4 years ago

Proposed construction too massive & dense for this site. Keep current zoning.

N
Neville Laing
4 years ago

Too big, roads not made for this size development, must come in size.

S
Stephen Grieco
4 years ago

CHP has chosen the path of least resistance to get this project approved, instead of an alternative zoning process that would have involved more opportunities for input from town residents.

K
Kimberley Homer
4 years ago

Affordable housing and subsidized housing are both important, and there are better ways to create them than this. What's wrong with R-5? Too little profit for CHP and the property owner, Rengin Holt. Why are we neighbors who care about children's safety now the bad guys? Also, why did CHP's Melissa Jones not recuse herself from the Planning Commission vote?

A
Alice Ledford
4 years ago

It would be our hope that the TC and those working in and around the advance planning of these projects could have more imagination than to just stick density on places like this corner. Those of us fighting this density aren't against affordable housing and it is gaslighting for those in power (and others) to say that we are. It isn't an either/or as CHP threatens. We fancy ourselves a progressive thinking town, but never integrate innovated types of housing that blend in affordable housing like other towns have figured out long ago. Lets just stick an enormous building on a small corner, pat ourselves on the back and call it a day.

T
Thomas N Peck
4 years ago

Where will the children play?

K
Ken Stiles
4 years ago

If this rezoning happens it shows that the town puts profiteers above people --- and that the so called 'comprehensive plan' is meaningless and can be drastically changed when enough money is involved. Which town employees will profit from this drastic erosion of our CP?

K
Kim Taylor
4 years ago

I love affordable housing but this is WAY too many bedrooms in WAY too small acreage!

J
Joan Bellis
4 years ago

Main concern is the. Traffic on Country Club and the entrance / exit of the project

L
Laurel Glenn
4 years ago

Please please please protect this land and use it for a less dense project. The fear for pedestrian, cyclist, child safety is real and this just isn't the right spot for what is proposed.