Skip to main content

Supporters4CoachO

532 Comments

M
Mary Talley
5 years ago

I feel he did it to verify what exactly was said and it was not said out if malice or in a racial way. He should not be fired!

K
Ken Hill
5 years ago

Joe is a quality human being who did what he thought he was supposed to do. Do not terminate this man.

J
Julie Arth
5 years ago

LSR7 school board and Dr. Buck are incompetent leaders.

T
Therese Kent
5 years ago

I support Coach O.

J
Jeff Haas
5 years ago

He followed policy. It was his job

R
Rachel Turner
5 years ago

100% Support Coach Oswald

J
Jim Hughes
5 years ago

This has been mishandled by the district administration and the school board from the outset. It looks like another expensive and embarrassing lawsuit will be the likely outcome. Maybe it is time to consider a recall election for the entire school board and a re-examination of the Superintendent and Human Resources leadership.

L
Lindsay McHargue
5 years ago

Administration should be supporting its teachers, not dragging them for following what seems to be flawed procedures.

B
Bill Phillips
5 years ago

As described in numerous reports, his actions do not warrant termination or suspension. The district should do nothing more than evaluate procedures and train all teachers. His 27 year career should be considered. I am not aware that this situation demonstrates a pattern.

M
Michelle Grisamore
5 years ago

We MUST stand up for people like you and fight against this ridiculous and frightening movement to undermine our base values. I am happy to stand by you and fight!

S
Scott Meyer
5 years ago

I support the retention of decent and good human beings in our school district such as Coach Joe Oswald.

K
Kirt N Mosier
5 years ago

Mr. Oswald was following a long standing protocol. Do not cave to this unfairness.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

He is innocent

K
KIM GELVIN
5 years ago

Thank you

J
Janette Turner
5 years ago

I believe Mr Oswald should be allowed to keep his job. Is the BOE really going to take the word of a 13 year old boy that Mr Oswald called this boy the N word. I do not believe that for one second. As for student A she admitted to what was said and signed off on that. Mr Oswald was following procedures and repeated exactly what he heard from student A as he believed was the correct thing to do. If the rules aren’t clear then maybe someone should look into that. As far our superintendent, shame on him. Context does matter. In this case it matters a great deal. Mr Oswald’s reputation and character should account for some loyalty from the superintendent and the BOE from years of being an excellent teacher and an all around good person. I hope the BOE does the right thing. If we allow students to get away with making things up and getting teachers fired it will change LSR7 and not in a good way. Teachers want to come to our district to teach. Will they in the future?

S
Susanne Foster Thomure
5 years ago

Sounds as though Oswald was merely having the student who did utter this to another student verify what the student had said to another. The teacher is not guilty. Disappointed in this District's managment of the situation.

K
Kyle Boyce
5 years ago

Times like this are a moment to constrain the monster that PC culture has become...when things are taken out of context and fake news fuels a dangerous precedent that harms real people in the workplace.

J
Judy Meinders
5 years ago

Joe is not the villain here. He was doing his job as instructed. The superintendent should be the one fired for NOT doing his job.

S
Susan Ratigan
5 years ago

It would be abhorrent for Joe Oswald to be terminated in this situation. 27 years of dedicated service to our community can not be punished in this way.

W
Whitney Crabtree
5 years ago

This entire situation is asinine. Fire the superintendent for not doing his job by actually meeting the teacher before he accused him of racism. NOTHING ABOUT THIS IS RIGHT. I hope the coach sues the school. Plenty of evidence for that.