Support the Demolition of the Hollins Hey Hotel (APP/18/01443)
70 Comments
M
Mark Cawood
7 years ago
Hi Hans, can I please ask how you know about the viability of the building's repair and reuse. There's no evidence with the application to explain this.
M
Mark Cawood
7 years ago
Hi Michael, sorry that you've suffered parking problems but hotels do sometimes generate traffic it's a measure of business success!
There is no I indication that the building will become abandoned and clearly nobody wants that.
M
Mark Cawood
7 years ago
Hi Bridget, the building is not derelict and there is no indication that it will become so.
M
Mark Cawood
7 years ago
Hi Kieran, I fully appreciate you dad's personal circumstances and wish to retire aftwr such a long time serving the local community. Nonetheless, his circumstances are not, as a matter of law, matters which are relevant to the planning application's consideration.
M
Mark Cawood
7 years ago
Hi Lisa, the number of affordable homes actually proposed is zero, none, zilch.
M
Mark Cawood
7 years ago
Hi Phillip, there's no affordable housing proposed.
I agree that energy consuption can be a problem in old buildings but if that was the only criteria we'd have demolished all of our old buildings by now!
M
Mark Cawood
7 years ago
Hi Clinton.
Unfortunately planning applications are not decided on a head count of those for or against. They are decided on the development's allignment with planning policies. I don't know the Prenton case but I'm assuming that this is why residents lost out.
The building is occupied and not derelict. In the unfortunate event that it was allowed to fall into dereliction then the Council have powers to step in and sort the problem out
M
Mark Cawood
7 years ago
Hi John, the application makes no reference to providing affordable housing.
M
Mark Cawood
7 years ago
Thank you Catherine, I fully agree; and if a hotel use isn't viable then other uses should be thoroughly examined before demolition is considered
M
Mark Cawood
7 years ago
Hello Joanne, as one of the neighbours can I please ask what am suppose to be jealous of?
I am not opposed to the buildings reuse and to jump straight to it's demolition without considering it's reuse is wrong. It is also not in accordance with planning law or guidance, which is what the application must be judged against. These are the "rules" which must be followed.
We (the 100 plus people opposed to the application) are not "frustrating" the application, merely doing what we are entitled to do, which is comment on what is planned; which, in my view, is woeful in terms of its appearance and would be harmful to the local area.
I acknowledge that new homes would be delivered, which in a very small way might reduce pressure on other land, but this shouldn't be at the expense of a loss of a heritage asset and poor design.
J
James Leyland
7 years ago
This application adheres to all advice and suggestions required and should be granted.
Much needed housing and easing a parking problem just two benefits.
K
Kath Hislop
7 years ago
I support
C
Candy Roberts
7 years ago
Featured
This hotel should be knocked down before it falls down, the owners have tried every option and now its time to finally call time!
It seems the planning application has been frustrated by jealous neighbours... the same neighbours who complain when there is an event on and there is loads of cars parked.
Follow the rules and move on with this redevelopment now.
J
Joanne Roberts
7 years ago
Get on with it WBC
D
Dave Roberts
7 years ago
It's time to move on and redevelope this land
B
Bridget Boekweit
7 years ago
Better a positive result than a derelict building I support the the demolition of the Hollins Hey Hotel
S
Stephanie Roberts
7 years ago
Featured
I am a local resident and fully support the petition. As it says, all areas have been explored and the best option is to move forward with extra housing.
L
Lynn Davison
7 years ago
I support this petition.
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
Local housing needed
C
Catherine Jones
7 years ago
It would be criminal to demolish this hotel. It is part of our history. New Brighton needs suitable accommodation to continue to flourish and the locals need it too!
Hi Hans, can I please ask how you know about the viability of the building's repair and reuse. There's no evidence with the application to explain this.
Hi Michael, sorry that you've suffered parking problems but hotels do sometimes generate traffic it's a measure of business success! There is no I indication that the building will become abandoned and clearly nobody wants that.
Hi Bridget, the building is not derelict and there is no indication that it will become so.
Hi Kieran, I fully appreciate you dad's personal circumstances and wish to retire aftwr such a long time serving the local community. Nonetheless, his circumstances are not, as a matter of law, matters which are relevant to the planning application's consideration.
Hi Lisa, the number of affordable homes actually proposed is zero, none, zilch.
Hi Phillip, there's no affordable housing proposed. I agree that energy consuption can be a problem in old buildings but if that was the only criteria we'd have demolished all of our old buildings by now!
Hi Clinton. Unfortunately planning applications are not decided on a head count of those for or against. They are decided on the development's allignment with planning policies. I don't know the Prenton case but I'm assuming that this is why residents lost out. The building is occupied and not derelict. In the unfortunate event that it was allowed to fall into dereliction then the Council have powers to step in and sort the problem out
Hi John, the application makes no reference to providing affordable housing.
Thank you Catherine, I fully agree; and if a hotel use isn't viable then other uses should be thoroughly examined before demolition is considered
Hello Joanne, as one of the neighbours can I please ask what am suppose to be jealous of? I am not opposed to the buildings reuse and to jump straight to it's demolition without considering it's reuse is wrong. It is also not in accordance with planning law or guidance, which is what the application must be judged against. These are the "rules" which must be followed. We (the 100 plus people opposed to the application) are not "frustrating" the application, merely doing what we are entitled to do, which is comment on what is planned; which, in my view, is woeful in terms of its appearance and would be harmful to the local area. I acknowledge that new homes would be delivered, which in a very small way might reduce pressure on other land, but this shouldn't be at the expense of a loss of a heritage asset and poor design.
This application adheres to all advice and suggestions required and should be granted. Much needed housing and easing a parking problem just two benefits.
I support
This hotel should be knocked down before it falls down, the owners have tried every option and now its time to finally call time! It seems the planning application has been frustrated by jealous neighbours... the same neighbours who complain when there is an event on and there is loads of cars parked. Follow the rules and move on with this redevelopment now.
Get on with it WBC
It's time to move on and redevelope this land
Better a positive result than a derelict building I support the the demolition of the Hollins Hey Hotel
I am a local resident and fully support the petition. As it says, all areas have been explored and the best option is to move forward with extra housing.
I support this petition.
Local housing needed
It would be criminal to demolish this hotel. It is part of our history. New Brighton needs suitable accommodation to continue to flourish and the locals need it too!