The impact of this amount of development on quality of life, traffic, air pollution,etc, is unconscionable.
V
Virginia Faller
8 years ago
Poli Sci 1973
A
Art Eisenson
8 years ago
Common sense, the premise of this petition, is about long-term health. And yes, that can get in the way of the flow of money.
D
Denis Hayes
8 years ago
Stanford should be deeply committed to the sustainability issues that some of its leading scholars study. All buildings should be net zero energy, net zero carbon, net zero water, and completely toxic-free. Many cities have begun dramatically reducing parking requirements because of an expected autonomous vehicle fleet paired with growth of public transit. Much of this innovation was born at Stanford. Did the planners not notice? The university should be designed to accommodate the needs of the coming century, not the last one.
N
Nick Ward
8 years ago
AGREE!
J
James Cook
8 years ago
Please commit to keeping the foothills free of development in perpetuity.
D
David Ostwald
8 years ago
Featured
As a resident in nearby Ladera, I am very concerned about the impact of a large development at Stanford on congestion, housing, air quality and quality of life. The limitations proposed in this petition seem to me imminently reasonable and fair
K
Karen Harwell
8 years ago
Yes, we have definitely reached limits to growth thus measuring our success by how much we can grow is counter productive!
M
Marilynf Bauriedel
8 years ago
I don't think the Stanford GUP plan is at all sustainable. I have lived next to Stanford for nearly 50 years and have seen the growth there just mushroom and take over so much land and bring in so much traffic. Stanford's requests are beyond what the area can support. One of my concerns is that the school population will increase substantially without Stanford's paying its fair share to PAUSD for adding a full new school's worth of students.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Stanford had enough money to build a football stadium in 9 months. They have resources to make sure that students, faculty and staff have housing and transit options.
K
Kay Sabin
8 years ago
I am against more growth until they can provide us with how they are going to handle the increase of more traffic.
H
Helen Walter
8 years ago
Urgent
J
Joh Steinharrt
8 years ago
We also need greater mitigation of traffic impacts.
C
Carol Scottq
8 years ago
Stanford needs to contribute to the development of additional infrastructure (schools, sewer, water, etc.) needed to service this increase in population.
K
Keith Bennett
8 years ago
Stanford also needs to consider and mitigate impacts on water supplies.
T
Thomas Rivell
8 years ago
Stanford Graduate School of Engineering Alumnus
P
Patricia Jones
8 years ago
I couldn't agree more with all the points expressed in this petition.
A
Alice Smith
8 years ago
We need housing for your current employees and current students. You need to help reduce the housing and environmental impacts of your current use. The maccademization of Stanford is not the right choice.
S
Susie Richardson
8 years ago
I am seriously concerned that we have reached our max in terms of traffic and other environmental and human impacts.
P
Peter Rosenthal
8 years ago
I support this request and think it is in keeping with the current discussion in Palo Alto about mitigating congestion and housing imbalances.
The impact of this amount of development on quality of life, traffic, air pollution,etc, is unconscionable.
Poli Sci 1973
Common sense, the premise of this petition, is about long-term health. And yes, that can get in the way of the flow of money.
Stanford should be deeply committed to the sustainability issues that some of its leading scholars study. All buildings should be net zero energy, net zero carbon, net zero water, and completely toxic-free. Many cities have begun dramatically reducing parking requirements because of an expected autonomous vehicle fleet paired with growth of public transit. Much of this innovation was born at Stanford. Did the planners not notice? The university should be designed to accommodate the needs of the coming century, not the last one.
AGREE!
Please commit to keeping the foothills free of development in perpetuity.
As a resident in nearby Ladera, I am very concerned about the impact of a large development at Stanford on congestion, housing, air quality and quality of life. The limitations proposed in this petition seem to me imminently reasonable and fair
Yes, we have definitely reached limits to growth thus measuring our success by how much we can grow is counter productive!
I don't think the Stanford GUP plan is at all sustainable. I have lived next to Stanford for nearly 50 years and have seen the growth there just mushroom and take over so much land and bring in so much traffic. Stanford's requests are beyond what the area can support. One of my concerns is that the school population will increase substantially without Stanford's paying its fair share to PAUSD for adding a full new school's worth of students.
Stanford had enough money to build a football stadium in 9 months. They have resources to make sure that students, faculty and staff have housing and transit options.
I am against more growth until they can provide us with how they are going to handle the increase of more traffic.
Urgent
We also need greater mitigation of traffic impacts.
Stanford needs to contribute to the development of additional infrastructure (schools, sewer, water, etc.) needed to service this increase in population.
Stanford also needs to consider and mitigate impacts on water supplies.
Stanford Graduate School of Engineering Alumnus
I couldn't agree more with all the points expressed in this petition.
We need housing for your current employees and current students. You need to help reduce the housing and environmental impacts of your current use. The maccademization of Stanford is not the right choice.
I am seriously concerned that we have reached our max in terms of traffic and other environmental and human impacts.
I support this request and think it is in keeping with the current discussion in Palo Alto about mitigating congestion and housing imbalances.