Ottawa should pay for any cost to the city in the Moodyville area
D
Doreen Rogers
12 years ago
Concerns on the Recommended Density of 1.25 in the current draft
R
ROSS BINKLRY
12 years ago
THIS PETITION SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BEFORE THIS AND SHOULD BE SUPPORTED NOW.
K
Kara McCann
12 years ago
Agree 100%
D
Douglas Ford
12 years ago
perfect area for increased density
J
Jesse kimoff
12 years ago
Let's make moodyville a green clean space were I can one day raise my children.
J
John Dhaliwal
12 years ago
I strongly agree
E
Erik Triance
12 years ago
Featured
Agreed. Noise and dust are much worse since the trees have been removed from the top of the bank. Honestly the S. side of 1st should be converted to park/green space while the rest of the neighbourhood densities.
K
Kevin Hoy
12 years ago
This visionary plan creats an affordable life style for future North Van residents.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
1.6 is appropriate for a transportation corridor. There is no said zoning cliff because the transition is on 4th street...1.6 -> .75 -> .5 By the sounds of it, people on 4th are opposed because they may have no intention of utilizing the .75 zoning in the near future. For that matter, much of 3rd may not utilize it soon either. However, this doesn't mean that the proposed zoning doesn't fit. I adamantly agree with 1.6 FSR on 3rd, scaled down slightly south.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
1.6 is appropriate for a transportation corridor. There is no said zoning cliff because the transition is on 4th street...1.6 -> .75 -> .5 By the sounds of it, people on 4th are opposed because they may have no intention of utilizing the .75 zoning in the near future. For that matter, much of 3rd may not utilize it soon either. However, this doesn't mean that the proposed zoning doesn't fit. I adamantly agree with 1.6 FSR on 3rd, scaled down slightly south.
A
Anita Palm
12 years ago
Featured
I would love to see this area grow into a beautiful complex community. I is close to everything for walking, biking, driving. I would like to see the density away from lonsdale. This is a good area as it wouldn't have alot of drive through traffic.
K
Kelly Palm
12 years ago
i do support this change in the moodyville area of much higher density. Close access to everything.
C
Charyl Reid
12 years ago
I strongly support this process of higher density in the Moodyville area.
As a resident that lives in the area, I fully support density in the area.
As a home owner in the 600 block of East 2nd St., I fully support more density in this area.
As a resident that lives in this area, I fully support more density
As a home owner in this block, I fully support more density in this area.
[email protected]
I am all for increased density; it's about time.
Ottawa should pay for any cost to the city in the Moodyville area
Concerns on the Recommended Density of 1.25 in the current draft
THIS PETITION SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BEFORE THIS AND SHOULD BE SUPPORTED NOW.
Agree 100%
perfect area for increased density
Let's make moodyville a green clean space were I can one day raise my children.
I strongly agree
Agreed. Noise and dust are much worse since the trees have been removed from the top of the bank. Honestly the S. side of 1st should be converted to park/green space while the rest of the neighbourhood densities.
This visionary plan creats an affordable life style for future North Van residents.
1.6 is appropriate for a transportation corridor. There is no said zoning cliff because the transition is on 4th street...1.6 -> .75 -> .5 By the sounds of it, people on 4th are opposed because they may have no intention of utilizing the .75 zoning in the near future. For that matter, much of 3rd may not utilize it soon either. However, this doesn't mean that the proposed zoning doesn't fit. I adamantly agree with 1.6 FSR on 3rd, scaled down slightly south.
1.6 is appropriate for a transportation corridor. There is no said zoning cliff because the transition is on 4th street...1.6 -> .75 -> .5 By the sounds of it, people on 4th are opposed because they may have no intention of utilizing the .75 zoning in the near future. For that matter, much of 3rd may not utilize it soon either. However, this doesn't mean that the proposed zoning doesn't fit. I adamantly agree with 1.6 FSR on 3rd, scaled down slightly south.
I would love to see this area grow into a beautiful complex community. I is close to everything for walking, biking, driving. I would like to see the density away from lonsdale. This is a good area as it wouldn't have alot of drive through traffic.
i do support this change in the moodyville area of much higher density. Close access to everything.
I strongly support this process of higher density in the Moodyville area.