The General Medical Council has confirmed that Dr Nadeem Ahmed has been removed from the medical register. This outcome validates our insistence that ethical standards regarding parental consent remain professional requirements rather than suggestions. Thank you for your commitment to ensuring accountability in this case.
Calling on the General Medical Council to Strike Dr Nadeem Ahmed off the medical register for performing circumcision on chlldren contrary to the guidance that requires the consent of both parents.
The feedback received from those reading these accounts confirms that the necessity for clear medical accountability remains critical. Proper oversight must be maintained to ensure that practitioners adhere to the established standards of informed consent for every patient.
October 11, 2015
The traction this petition has gained demonstrates a clear public demand for accountability regarding medical ethics. This momentum highlights the urgency of our request to the General Medical Council.
Reached 100 supporters
October 11, 2015
87 Comments
S
Stu Silverman
10 years ago
Featured
What Dr. Ahmed did was a gross violation of the children's basic human rights to bodily integrity. The Hippocratic Oath states "First do no harm." However, these children have irreparable damage due to the non-consensual amputation of functional, protective and highly sensitive cells.
T
Timothy Alford
10 years ago
Featured
He is guilty of a gross violation of Human Rights. The UK is signatory to the UN Convention On The Rights Of The Child which states clearly that nothing, not even the religion of the parents or any other adult can over ride the child's Right to bodily Integrity. This 'Dr' should be prosecuted.
I
Iris Fudge
10 years ago
Featured
Dr Nadeem Ahmed deliberately ignored the guidance to obtain both parents consent KNOWING that one of them was opposed to circumcision, so should be struck off the medical register.
R
Rood Andersson
10 years ago
Featured
Evidently, as the doctor performed the procedure at the instigation of one parent, both doctor and that parent should be censured. Also, the very idea that mutilating the genitals of un-consenting children is a religious rite needs addressing. Religion is a matter of the Spirit, not something to be chopped off the genitals of children.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Featured
I wish I had been protected from this violation of my rights and mutilation of my body. Men who cut children, with consentfrom parents or not should be jailed. This man is no different than the monster who did this to me, only he has a petition for me to sign, so I sign it. Wake up, you tortured your children north America and we are angry..
J
James Mac
10 years ago
Featured
Dr Nadeem Ahmed has used his medical tools and training to wound the sexual organs of children and has done so in violation of GMC rules that require the consent of both parents before the wound is inflicted.
A
Arielseive
5 years ago
электронные сигареты купить украина - https://hqd.wiki
M
Michael Nightingale
9 years ago
This is disgraceful and contrary to medical ethics
The General Medical Council has confirmed that Dr Nadeem Ahmed has been removed from the medical register. This outcome validates our insistence that ethical standards regarding parental consent remain professional requirements rather than suggestions. Thank you for your commitment to ensuring accountability in this case.
Calling on the General Medical Council to Strike Dr Nadeem Ahmed off the medical register for performing circumcision on chlldren contrary to the guidance that requires the consent of both parents.
The feedback received from those reading these accounts confirms that the necessity for clear medical accountability remains critical. Proper oversight must be maintained to ensure that practitioners adhere to the established standards of informed consent for every patient.
October 11, 2015
The traction this petition has gained demonstrates a clear public demand for accountability regarding medical ethics. This momentum highlights the urgency of our request to the General Medical Council.
Reached 100 supporters
October 11, 2015
87 Comments
S
Stu Silverman
10 years ago
Featured
What Dr. Ahmed did was a gross violation of the children's basic human rights to bodily integrity. The Hippocratic Oath states "First do no harm." However, these children have irreparable damage due to the non-consensual amputation of functional, protective and highly sensitive cells.
T
Timothy Alford
10 years ago
Featured
He is guilty of a gross violation of Human Rights. The UK is signatory to the UN Convention On The Rights Of The Child which states clearly that nothing, not even the religion of the parents or any other adult can over ride the child's Right to bodily Integrity. This 'Dr' should be prosecuted.
I
Iris Fudge
10 years ago
Featured
Dr Nadeem Ahmed deliberately ignored the guidance to obtain both parents consent KNOWING that one of them was opposed to circumcision, so should be struck off the medical register.
R
Rood Andersson
10 years ago
Featured
Evidently, as the doctor performed the procedure at the instigation of one parent, both doctor and that parent should be censured. Also, the very idea that mutilating the genitals of un-consenting children is a religious rite needs addressing. Religion is a matter of the Spirit, not something to be chopped off the genitals of children.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Featured
I wish I had been protected from this violation of my rights and mutilation of my body. Men who cut children, with consentfrom parents or not should be jailed. This man is no different than the monster who did this to me, only he has a petition for me to sign, so I sign it. Wake up, you tortured your children north America and we are angry..
J
James Mac
10 years ago
Featured
Dr Nadeem Ahmed has used his medical tools and training to wound the sexual organs of children and has done so in violation of GMC rules that require the consent of both parents before the wound is inflicted.
A
Arielseive
5 years ago
электронные сигареты купить украина - https://hqd.wiki
M
Michael Nightingale
9 years ago
This is disgraceful and contrary to medical ethics
What Dr. Ahmed did was a gross violation of the children's basic human rights to bodily integrity. The Hippocratic Oath states "First do no harm." However, these children have irreparable damage due to the non-consensual amputation of functional, protective and highly sensitive cells.