The committee putting the standard together simply ignored prominent and expert disagreement about its content. It also did nothing to research actual industry practice. This is a power play by a group of friends who want power over the testing industry. It's a disgrace.
E
Ederson Aguiar
3 years ago
Stop this!
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Stop 29119
J
Jay
5 years ago
Lets stop this - i do not see any value from it - waste of time - only abstract and absolute and ideal things in it - lets get real and think of good practices instead of best practices. Stop wasting our time - Software workers have serious things to do.
A
Anuradha Bahl
6 years ago
Don’t take the children’s food away
T
Thad Butterworth
7 years ago
Featured
Our industry evolves way too fast to set standards like this. What might be a good practice now will be malpractice in the future, but if we lock it all down to an ISO standard we will be forced to adopt practices which in reality are malpractice.
J
Johan Bäfverfeldt
8 years ago
It is time to let truth guide Software Testing
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Featured
Because of this standard our customers are asking some questions which does not make sense - show & document the the test policy for this project. Unfortunately the local standards organization has not educated them properly. As a result we are put to hardship
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
This 'standard' does not reflect modern testing practices and therefore holds many companies back.
A
awdad
9 years ago
awdad
G
Giuseppe T
9 years ago
I am guessing the real value about this standard.
D
David Evans
10 years ago
Featured
There is no more a standard way of testing software than there is a standard way of coding software, a standard Software Developer, a standard Software Tester or a standard Software Project.
G
GARY WOODSIDE
10 years ago
These 'standards' are no longer required.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
This standard does not work. This is a business to fake testing and get your money
T
Tom Dixon
10 years ago
Featured
Testing is thinking activity not a prescriptive activity. This standard does not appear to be representative or the entire software testing industry and is biased towards those that set to benefit from it, namely the qualifications providers who need a standard to justify their qualifications.
S
seki hidetake
10 years ago
Standard is useful , but not necessarily the best .
M
Michele Viti
10 years ago
l'aggiornamento fa schifo
S
Susan Finley
10 years ago
A standard that omits the innovative thinking of the last 10 years will perpetuate the issues in software development today. Software Testing is the "secret sauce" of software development don't let this standard drag us back to the dark ages.
D
Danny Lee
10 years ago
I Think "Test depends on Context"! It is so ironic that has standard!
C
Cengiz Can
10 years ago
A tester should always be skeptic. Stop this bureaucratic non-sense now!
The committee putting the standard together simply ignored prominent and expert disagreement about its content. It also did nothing to research actual industry practice. This is a power play by a group of friends who want power over the testing industry. It's a disgrace.
Stop this!
Stop 29119
Lets stop this - i do not see any value from it - waste of time - only abstract and absolute and ideal things in it - lets get real and think of good practices instead of best practices. Stop wasting our time - Software workers have serious things to do.
Don’t take the children’s food away
Our industry evolves way too fast to set standards like this. What might be a good practice now will be malpractice in the future, but if we lock it all down to an ISO standard we will be forced to adopt practices which in reality are malpractice.
It is time to let truth guide Software Testing
Because of this standard our customers are asking some questions which does not make sense - show & document the the test policy for this project. Unfortunately the local standards organization has not educated them properly. As a result we are put to hardship
This 'standard' does not reflect modern testing practices and therefore holds many companies back.
awdad
I am guessing the real value about this standard.
There is no more a standard way of testing software than there is a standard way of coding software, a standard Software Developer, a standard Software Tester or a standard Software Project.
These 'standards' are no longer required.
This standard does not work. This is a business to fake testing and get your money
Testing is thinking activity not a prescriptive activity. This standard does not appear to be representative or the entire software testing industry and is biased towards those that set to benefit from it, namely the qualifications providers who need a standard to justify their qualifications.
Standard is useful , but not necessarily the best .
l'aggiornamento fa schifo
A standard that omits the innovative thinking of the last 10 years will perpetuate the issues in software development today. Software Testing is the "secret sauce" of software development don't let this standard drag us back to the dark ages.
I Think "Test depends on Context"! It is so ironic that has standard!
A tester should always be skeptic. Stop this bureaucratic non-sense now!