The infrastructure is not sufficient to support this many new homes
D
D Wilkins
10 years ago
No thought seems to have been given regarding building adequate infrastructure i.e. doctors, schools, hospitals, roads, utilities. This is essential before any work of this nature is even considered.
M
Mrs J Elliott
10 years ago
No further development should be contemplated until the infrastructre, especially a bidirectional link at Inworth, is sorted out. Tain services during rush hour are already at capacity and commuter parking clogs side roads. Further development will on make things worse.
M
Mrs J Elliott
10 years ago
Vehicles on the A12/A120 are already gridlocked on a daily basis. Accidents on the A12 result in diversions through Kelvedon & Feering which are unable to cope with the volume. Trains to London during rush hour are already at capacity, with commuters standing all the way to London. There is insufficient parking for commuters, resulting in local roads being clogged daily and this will only increase if developments of this size are allowed. Local schools are already over subscribed and NHS services will not be able to cope with the pressures put on them.
J
Julia Brophy
10 years ago
Local amaenties are already very poor and the A120 in this area is already a daily nightmare - and the train service to London poor. A smaller number of homes - in the region of 5,000 might be viable IF the road was first improved - and other amenties were up and running prior to the completion.
R
Robert Covey
10 years ago
To many houses !
D
David English
10 years ago
by all means build new houses but a very high concentration of houses seem to be in Marks tey at an already struggling junction with e a120 and a12. better roads are needed first
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
The infrastructure must be upgraded to cope with existing pressures before even considering a massive new development
V
Vivienne langlois
10 years ago
It is patently absurd to build a huge number of houses when the current infrastructure is already creaking.No,no,no
S
Stuart McConnell
10 years ago
Too large a development for this area.
M
malcom smith
10 years ago
not good for the people who live in the areas around nor for the people who will move their as areas are struggling as it is doctors hospitals emergency service we have a police stations closing in witham and they just built a new housing estate there i don't think they know what they are doing at the council this will course more pollution less jobs and then more crime u do the maths
S
Sarah Watney
10 years ago
It will destroy the country side making Colchester virtually join up with Braintree. The traffic will be impossible., the trains are crowded now Too many houses in onecontinuous development. Planning permission should NOT be granted
J
James Kneller
10 years ago
The infrastructure is not in place to support this, the A120 will be even more of a death trap than it already is, this is simply irresponsible. It is also, very simply, way too big for the area.
S
Sue Tipson
10 years ago
i object to this urban sprawl. As per usual the infrastructure and impact on existing services has not been thought about. How does this benefit the existing communities?
P
Patricia MacKay
10 years ago
The road, rail education and medical services cannot cope with such a large influx of people
K
Kieran Barnes
10 years ago
Far too big for this area and roads
A
ANNETTE BARTON
10 years ago
I do not want the countryside destroyed around this area, we came her for peace and quiet.The A120 is overloaded and dangerous and despite an earlier campaign which must have cost a fortune for consultation and meetings to re-route and expand this road, nothing has happened! Waste of tax-payers' money and people's time who were consulted about what they thought. Now it would appear the process is being repeated.
L
Linda Brightmore
10 years ago
a small village will become part of an urban sprawl from Colchester to Braintree
J
James Brightmore
10 years ago
The sprawl into the countryside will not be able to be supported by the infrastructure and will lead to a continued urbanisation from east Colchester to Braintree
C
Cheryl sly
10 years ago
I am not against new housing projects as understand that new AFFORDABLE housing is required but large developments such as this need to consider local services and destruction/loss of our countryside and farm land for future generations.
The infrastructure is not sufficient to support this many new homes
No thought seems to have been given regarding building adequate infrastructure i.e. doctors, schools, hospitals, roads, utilities. This is essential before any work of this nature is even considered.
No further development should be contemplated until the infrastructre, especially a bidirectional link at Inworth, is sorted out. Tain services during rush hour are already at capacity and commuter parking clogs side roads. Further development will on make things worse.
Vehicles on the A12/A120 are already gridlocked on a daily basis. Accidents on the A12 result in diversions through Kelvedon & Feering which are unable to cope with the volume. Trains to London during rush hour are already at capacity, with commuters standing all the way to London. There is insufficient parking for commuters, resulting in local roads being clogged daily and this will only increase if developments of this size are allowed. Local schools are already over subscribed and NHS services will not be able to cope with the pressures put on them.
Local amaenties are already very poor and the A120 in this area is already a daily nightmare - and the train service to London poor. A smaller number of homes - in the region of 5,000 might be viable IF the road was first improved - and other amenties were up and running prior to the completion.
To many houses !
by all means build new houses but a very high concentration of houses seem to be in Marks tey at an already struggling junction with e a120 and a12. better roads are needed first
The infrastructure must be upgraded to cope with existing pressures before even considering a massive new development
It is patently absurd to build a huge number of houses when the current infrastructure is already creaking.No,no,no
Too large a development for this area.
not good for the people who live in the areas around nor for the people who will move their as areas are struggling as it is doctors hospitals emergency service we have a police stations closing in witham and they just built a new housing estate there i don't think they know what they are doing at the council this will course more pollution less jobs and then more crime u do the maths
It will destroy the country side making Colchester virtually join up with Braintree. The traffic will be impossible., the trains are crowded now Too many houses in onecontinuous development. Planning permission should NOT be granted
The infrastructure is not in place to support this, the A120 will be even more of a death trap than it already is, this is simply irresponsible. It is also, very simply, way too big for the area.
i object to this urban sprawl. As per usual the infrastructure and impact on existing services has not been thought about. How does this benefit the existing communities?
The road, rail education and medical services cannot cope with such a large influx of people
Far too big for this area and roads
I do not want the countryside destroyed around this area, we came her for peace and quiet.The A120 is overloaded and dangerous and despite an earlier campaign which must have cost a fortune for consultation and meetings to re-route and expand this road, nothing has happened! Waste of tax-payers' money and people's time who were consulted about what they thought. Now it would appear the process is being repeated.
a small village will become part of an urban sprawl from Colchester to Braintree
The sprawl into the countryside will not be able to be supported by the infrastructure and will lead to a continued urbanisation from east Colchester to Braintree
I am not against new housing projects as understand that new AFFORDABLE housing is required but large developments such as this need to consider local services and destruction/loss of our countryside and farm land for future generations.