STOP the TDSB EETF: NO to De-streaming; NO to Cancelling Specialty Programs; NO to Cancelling Optional Attendance; NO to "reforming" Gifted Programs
555 Comments
J
John Kneller
8 years ago
The GAC information package was very well researched. It really opened my eyes to how flawed the TDSB plan is. Education employers in Ontario are running rampant, seemingly in all sectors. It is disgruntling for those of us who take education seriously.
A
Aditi Chhetri
8 years ago
Hi, I am a student in the Gifted Program and I love being in it. I would not like the Gifted Program to be cancelled; it’s what makes me feel who I am.
B
Barbara
8 years ago
Both of our children had the tremendous fortune to attend gifted programs in the TDSB high schools. Had that program not existed, we would have put them back in the specialized private school they previously attended - meaning fewer students in the school board. But most parents and children would not have that option - and public education offer all children the appropriate education.
As a parent, before we moved back to Toronto, I was on the Simcoe Board of Ed Special Ed Advisory Committee for several years representing gifted students. I learned first hand of the challenges faced by all groups involved in special ed. And also realized that many children "fit" multiple slots - Learning Disabled gifted for example. It was clear that specialized programs for all such students are needed and the needed support CANNOT be provided in the traditional classroom. For gifted - most teachers get 20 minutes of training in their program and have no idea of how to work with gifted students.
I found in my participation in SEAC that although integration is the mandated first option, that for many special ed students, this becomes the cop-out for the boards and they do not get the support they need in the regular classroom, get passed from grade to grade, graduating high school without the knowledge and skills to succeed. We are not doing any children a service with this form of education.
I value the TDSB and recognize the challenges of such a diverse student population. I realize that not all programs can be made available in every single school - but that should not prevent the children being offered the opportunity to go out of district to get the education they need.
I spoke with one teacher just after integration became mandated (she was from another board). She had 5 identified students - severe disabled who screamed throughout the day and severe behavioral, LD - dyslexia, milder behavioral, and a gifted learner. Without full time classroom aide, he
E
Ellen Scheinberg
8 years ago
These changes will severely undermine the quality of the education our children receive and caliber of students that graduate from the TDSB.
S
Shari Hughson
8 years ago
As a graduate level educator, I do not believe this will assist top students to excel and move forward with their education and leadership careers, ultimately impacting our economy.
J
Jane sit
8 years ago
Reforming the gifted program is detrimental to students who need the extra challenge. Boredom also leads to drop out rates.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
This is whack
A
Amanda Lauzon
8 years ago
Former TDSB French Immersion Teacher (taught in the gifted stream and MAST streams). You cannot take away these essential programs! Students need supports now more than ever. It is impossible to make it one-size-fits-all!
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Specialty programs are critical to address all our children's needs.
D
David Pamenter
8 years ago
My son was in the gifted programme. Now a PhD working as an Asst Prof in biology at an Ontario University. At least two of his class mates are in similarly situated at Harvard and UC at Irvine. The programme works.
T
Tracey Taylor
8 years ago
These children will suffer for the loss of a program that places them into a school system designed for the lowest capabilities. This is devistating
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Strongly urge TDSB to keep the "Congregated" gifted program.
Having the gifted kids incorporated back into regular classroom is diasaterous to all 3 parties -the teacher, the gifted-kids & non-gifted kids. STOP IT ! STOP IT! STOP IT!!
V
Viviane Rabu
8 years ago
The gifted program was crucial in maintaining our child motivated and helping him realize his full potential in many areas. We are so thankful he was able to find an option for high school that fully met his needs.
We believe it would be a very big mistake to withdraw specialty programs that are key in responding to the wide variety of needs of the student population, and the best configuration possible for ensuring that all students develop the tools to fully contribute in building tomorrow's society.
M
Marija
8 years ago
As a recent immigrant and non-visible minority, I find the proposals in report insulting to my intelligence and completely eliminating any meaningful options of any non-visible minority. This has to stop.
S
Shan Barr
8 years ago
In a time in the world when we are finally recognizing children who are gifted and who need special care, it is the responsibility of the school system to support what science, medicine and parents are recognizing. To eliminate programs is a huge step backward. The school board needs to stay current and be more savvy, and ahead of these needs for a change. Slow diwn this decision-making! Take a look worldwide as to what is going on in education. Finland and Denmark Are truly inspiring.
A
Alexander Shik
8 years ago
Professor, University of Toronto
W
Walter Wodchis
8 years ago
I submitted comments to this effect already and strongly urge NOT proceeding with the proposed recommendations .
M
Matt J
8 years ago
They need to take the time to properly gather public feedback and assess, not rush the process, cut off public input after a 3 week (attempted) window and cram it down people's throats. Right away that is a non starter - these are our kids we're talking about here. Please back off and give this a serious rethink. Digest all the voices you are hearing from this petition.
Y
yessenia rivera
8 years ago
I feel that all of this matter are very importante. I was able to get my children in an optional attendance. And I'm so happy I did parents should have a choice to where we send our children
T
Theodora Dellaportas
8 years ago
As the parent of a child who attended the gifted program and the grandmother of a child in optional attendance, I implore you to take more time to review the cuts you are proposing.
The GAC information package was very well researched. It really opened my eyes to how flawed the TDSB plan is. Education employers in Ontario are running rampant, seemingly in all sectors. It is disgruntling for those of us who take education seriously.
Hi, I am a student in the Gifted Program and I love being in it. I would not like the Gifted Program to be cancelled; it’s what makes me feel who I am.
Both of our children had the tremendous fortune to attend gifted programs in the TDSB high schools. Had that program not existed, we would have put them back in the specialized private school they previously attended - meaning fewer students in the school board. But most parents and children would not have that option - and public education offer all children the appropriate education. As a parent, before we moved back to Toronto, I was on the Simcoe Board of Ed Special Ed Advisory Committee for several years representing gifted students. I learned first hand of the challenges faced by all groups involved in special ed. And also realized that many children "fit" multiple slots - Learning Disabled gifted for example. It was clear that specialized programs for all such students are needed and the needed support CANNOT be provided in the traditional classroom. For gifted - most teachers get 20 minutes of training in their program and have no idea of how to work with gifted students. I found in my participation in SEAC that although integration is the mandated first option, that for many special ed students, this becomes the cop-out for the boards and they do not get the support they need in the regular classroom, get passed from grade to grade, graduating high school without the knowledge and skills to succeed. We are not doing any children a service with this form of education. I value the TDSB and recognize the challenges of such a diverse student population. I realize that not all programs can be made available in every single school - but that should not prevent the children being offered the opportunity to go out of district to get the education they need. I spoke with one teacher just after integration became mandated (she was from another board). She had 5 identified students - severe disabled who screamed throughout the day and severe behavioral, LD - dyslexia, milder behavioral, and a gifted learner. Without full time classroom aide, he
These changes will severely undermine the quality of the education our children receive and caliber of students that graduate from the TDSB.
As a graduate level educator, I do not believe this will assist top students to excel and move forward with their education and leadership careers, ultimately impacting our economy.
Reforming the gifted program is detrimental to students who need the extra challenge. Boredom also leads to drop out rates.
This is whack
Former TDSB French Immersion Teacher (taught in the gifted stream and MAST streams). You cannot take away these essential programs! Students need supports now more than ever. It is impossible to make it one-size-fits-all!
Specialty programs are critical to address all our children's needs.
My son was in the gifted programme. Now a PhD working as an Asst Prof in biology at an Ontario University. At least two of his class mates are in similarly situated at Harvard and UC at Irvine. The programme works.
These children will suffer for the loss of a program that places them into a school system designed for the lowest capabilities. This is devistating
Strongly urge TDSB to keep the "Congregated" gifted program. Having the gifted kids incorporated back into regular classroom is diasaterous to all 3 parties -the teacher, the gifted-kids & non-gifted kids. STOP IT ! STOP IT! STOP IT!!
The gifted program was crucial in maintaining our child motivated and helping him realize his full potential in many areas. We are so thankful he was able to find an option for high school that fully met his needs. We believe it would be a very big mistake to withdraw specialty programs that are key in responding to the wide variety of needs of the student population, and the best configuration possible for ensuring that all students develop the tools to fully contribute in building tomorrow's society.
As a recent immigrant and non-visible minority, I find the proposals in report insulting to my intelligence and completely eliminating any meaningful options of any non-visible minority. This has to stop.
In a time in the world when we are finally recognizing children who are gifted and who need special care, it is the responsibility of the school system to support what science, medicine and parents are recognizing. To eliminate programs is a huge step backward. The school board needs to stay current and be more savvy, and ahead of these needs for a change. Slow diwn this decision-making! Take a look worldwide as to what is going on in education. Finland and Denmark Are truly inspiring.
Professor, University of Toronto
I submitted comments to this effect already and strongly urge NOT proceeding with the proposed recommendations .
They need to take the time to properly gather public feedback and assess, not rush the process, cut off public input after a 3 week (attempted) window and cram it down people's throats. Right away that is a non starter - these are our kids we're talking about here. Please back off and give this a serious rethink. Digest all the voices you are hearing from this petition.
I feel that all of this matter are very importante. I was able to get my children in an optional attendance. And I'm so happy I did parents should have a choice to where we send our children
As the parent of a child who attended the gifted program and the grandmother of a child in optional attendance, I implore you to take more time to review the cuts you are proposing.