Stop the relocation of the Emerson Cavitation Tunnel
140 Comments
S
Shuichi Ikeda
11 years ago
Stop the actual relocation plan!
淳
淳一 鈴木
11 years ago
Don't move ETC. They can not study.
H
Herbert Bretschneider
11 years ago
Don't relocate the ECT for the sake of the achieved high quality of the tunnel and the ongoing valuable research activities.
N
Naoki Makuta
11 years ago
Do not move the Emerson Cavitation Tunnel!!!
S
Shang Di
11 years ago
Please stop mess up PhD's study. They have paid their high rate tuition fees.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Stop or delay the relocation of the valuable tunnel for work by the students of NU and researchers in all UK.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Stop or delay the relocation of the valuable tunnel for work by the students of NU and researchers in all UK.
L
Luka Fenech
11 years ago
Stop the move of the cavitation tunnel, as it is the students who are part of the university have the unique opportunity to make use of it. Given that it is the only one in the uk it makes this cavitation tunnel a great asset, moving it away will reduce the value in the student's and researchers persepctive!
E
Emmanouil-Loizos Tsougranis
11 years ago
For the "Great minds" that want to relocate Emerson Cavitation Tunnel... Unfortunately, we can never truly know if we're making the right decision. What we do know is that wherever we are, that's where the Light wants us to be. It's the best place for us to be now. And as long as we don't try to control the situation, then we won't end up in the place we shouldn't be.
A
Abdullah Almutairi
11 years ago
Do not move the cavitation tunnel out of the university for no logic reasons that will effects the students and the staff educational process and productivity. No one I have met until now agrees with moving it out of the university and on one believes in the reasons that are set to move it out of the campus and far away from the university. This will cause difficulty to the students who are working on it and even the students who will be coming in the coming years they will take it as a disadvantage and annoying to work with dissertation that is connect to do work, researches and dealing with the cavitation tunnel because it will be far away from them and it will cost them time and money to get there.
T
Tatakis Antonios
11 years ago
Stop the relocation of the Emerson cavitation tunnel because students need to work on it on their academic years and Its location is very effective.
B
Baiqian Jiang
11 years ago
Stop the re-location of the cavitation tunnel
D
Dr Heinrich Streckwall
11 years ago
I follow the arguments of Andreas Junglewitz, meaning that
cavitation and propellers are a complex themes which need
a nearby facility to be demonstrated to upcoming naval architects
L
Lyn Bodger
11 years ago
The relocation of the Emerson Cavitation Tunnel is an ill considered scheme which will seriously damage the research and teaching capabilities of the University.
The large and complex nature of the tunnel structure, plus the need for absolute precision in its assembly, mean that there is a very real risk that the relocation will not be a practical proposition.
Lyn Bodger
Former MD
Stone Marine Propulsion Ltd.
D
Dr. Andreas Junglewitz, DNVGL Hamburg Germany
11 years ago
It is of utmost interest that students need to have a close contact to practical flow applications. Especially nowadays young people tend to hang on their computers only, but they urgently need to get their own impression from the real flow.
D
Dr Graham Patience
11 years ago
As the former Managing Director of Stone Manganese Marine - now Stone Marine Propulsion - I have first hand knowledge of the major contribution that the Cavitation Tunnel has provided to research and development of the marine propeller, not just in the UK but worldwide. It appals me that the University intend its relocation in this way without proper consideration for the effects this will have on those immediately affected and the ultimate degrading effect it will have upon the University itself and its reputation.
As a graduate of the University and one of those who used the facility in my own research, it is difficult to accept that this dreadful situation has arisen - apparently in the interests of the superficial appeal of the University structure and the perceived self-gratification of those promoting it.
Realistically, the relocation of the tunnel to Blythe will only end in its demise and I fully support any action taken to prevent this happening.
This project has shaken my long held belief in the quality and substance of the University as a centre of learning and I am now becoming increasingly ashamed of my once proudly-held connections with this campus.
T
Tadashi Shibue
11 years ago
Please discuss before decision.
W
Wooyong jang
11 years ago
thanks
S
Stephan Helma
11 years ago
Featured
I used to work at a university where the laboratory was 45 min away from the main building. Guess what? No student has been seen there!
And think about the waste of time for the academic staff to shuttle between the laboratory and the main building. You should make better use of their precious time!
Stop the actual relocation plan!
Don't move ETC. They can not study.
Don't relocate the ECT for the sake of the achieved high quality of the tunnel and the ongoing valuable research activities.
Do not move the Emerson Cavitation Tunnel!!!
Please stop mess up PhD's study. They have paid their high rate tuition fees.
Stop or delay the relocation of the valuable tunnel for work by the students of NU and researchers in all UK.
Stop or delay the relocation of the valuable tunnel for work by the students of NU and researchers in all UK.
Stop the move of the cavitation tunnel, as it is the students who are part of the university have the unique opportunity to make use of it. Given that it is the only one in the uk it makes this cavitation tunnel a great asset, moving it away will reduce the value in the student's and researchers persepctive!
For the "Great minds" that want to relocate Emerson Cavitation Tunnel... Unfortunately, we can never truly know if we're making the right decision. What we do know is that wherever we are, that's where the Light wants us to be. It's the best place for us to be now. And as long as we don't try to control the situation, then we won't end up in the place we shouldn't be.
Do not move the cavitation tunnel out of the university for no logic reasons that will effects the students and the staff educational process and productivity. No one I have met until now agrees with moving it out of the university and on one believes in the reasons that are set to move it out of the campus and far away from the university. This will cause difficulty to the students who are working on it and even the students who will be coming in the coming years they will take it as a disadvantage and annoying to work with dissertation that is connect to do work, researches and dealing with the cavitation tunnel because it will be far away from them and it will cost them time and money to get there.
Stop the relocation of the Emerson cavitation tunnel because students need to work on it on their academic years and Its location is very effective.
Stop the re-location of the cavitation tunnel
I follow the arguments of Andreas Junglewitz, meaning that cavitation and propellers are a complex themes which need a nearby facility to be demonstrated to upcoming naval architects
The relocation of the Emerson Cavitation Tunnel is an ill considered scheme which will seriously damage the research and teaching capabilities of the University. The large and complex nature of the tunnel structure, plus the need for absolute precision in its assembly, mean that there is a very real risk that the relocation will not be a practical proposition. Lyn Bodger Former MD Stone Marine Propulsion Ltd.
It is of utmost interest that students need to have a close contact to practical flow applications. Especially nowadays young people tend to hang on their computers only, but they urgently need to get their own impression from the real flow.
As the former Managing Director of Stone Manganese Marine - now Stone Marine Propulsion - I have first hand knowledge of the major contribution that the Cavitation Tunnel has provided to research and development of the marine propeller, not just in the UK but worldwide. It appals me that the University intend its relocation in this way without proper consideration for the effects this will have on those immediately affected and the ultimate degrading effect it will have upon the University itself and its reputation. As a graduate of the University and one of those who used the facility in my own research, it is difficult to accept that this dreadful situation has arisen - apparently in the interests of the superficial appeal of the University structure and the perceived self-gratification of those promoting it. Realistically, the relocation of the tunnel to Blythe will only end in its demise and I fully support any action taken to prevent this happening. This project has shaken my long held belief in the quality and substance of the University as a centre of learning and I am now becoming increasingly ashamed of my once proudly-held connections with this campus.
Please discuss before decision.
thanks
I used to work at a university where the laboratory was 45 min away from the main building. Guess what? No student has been seen there! And think about the waste of time for the academic staff to shuttle between the laboratory and the main building. You should make better use of their precious time!
Good