Stop the logo madness at Heysham High (Bay Leadership Academy
169 Comments
A
Amanda nuttall
8 years ago
Step too far!!
H
Holly gower
8 years ago
Featured
The pricing is diabolical. What difference is a logo going too make to a child's education or how smart they look. trousers and pencil skirts are also not inclusive to many children nor comfortable but for them to be doubled in price because of a small amount of stitching is absurd.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Uniform costs a lot to buy especially if there are twins or even more children. Did any one consider this first?
J
John Farling
8 years ago
How ludicrous to expect parents to spend excessive amounts on uniform some of which the logo is invisible,also the logo could be deemed religious.
M
M cope
8 years ago
Ridiculous idea , unfair on families of all sizes.
L
Lynne Smith
8 years ago
Flipping ridiculous, bad enough that you have to spend a fortune on polo shirts/tee shirts/ jumpers, sports uniform etc.
M
Mr G Worthington
8 years ago
Featured
School identity is important, but insisting all items of clothing carry the logo is nothing but profiteering. Enforcing a single supplier of said clothing is creating a monopoly helping to reinforce the high uniform prices.
S
Sheila Croskell
8 years ago
Do the teachers have to wear a uniform- and if so are they subsidised by the Private Company in charge of these Academies.?
A
Amanda Kendall
8 years ago
I am happy to buy tie and blazer...but not trousers at twenty pounds..it's too much money
M
Micky Balshaw
8 years ago
This is disgusting, especially when some parents are having trouble paying for food to put on a table. Not everyone can afford it.
R
Ryce McCall
8 years ago
Absolutely ridiculous, they did the same thing at my cousin's school a few years back, sold substandard pants that had a school logo on for a greatly inflated price
B
Bethan Trew
8 years ago
Money grabbing! £20 for trousers that will need replacing within a month. Absolutely ridiculous!
D
Danielle crossey
8 years ago
The shouldn't have to wear logo uniform, some families are in poverty as it it.
J
Jill
8 years ago
Ridiculous.It's like taking a step backwards.As if some parents aren't struggling enough without this extra expense.
M
Marj Slack
8 years ago
This is a ridiculous money making racket. Parents are really struggling to feed their kids and keep a roof over their heads and a jumper /sweatshirt /blazer with the logo on is surficient to make it a uniform. Not everyone earns as much as the governors and academy executives.
R
Rachel Howard
8 years ago
Absolutely terrible!
A
Amanda
8 years ago
The school uniform dose not need a logo on every piece told clothing and not all parents can afford to pay for it is a stupid idea there is nothing wrong with just having the logo on the jumpers like it has always been
J
Joanne Braid
8 years ago
Don't see the point you won't see the logo I have one child what about people that have more than one I'm a single parent its hard enough to survive
W
W hopps
8 years ago
They are running the school into the ground how long before it closes with making forced redundancies which they say are voluntary it very sad time for the school
J
Josh durham
8 years ago
Absolutely no need for logos on trousers and skirts. Reducing cost for parents in financial hardship by allowing generic pants and skirts
Step too far!!
The pricing is diabolical. What difference is a logo going too make to a child's education or how smart they look. trousers and pencil skirts are also not inclusive to many children nor comfortable but for them to be doubled in price because of a small amount of stitching is absurd.
Uniform costs a lot to buy especially if there are twins or even more children. Did any one consider this first?
How ludicrous to expect parents to spend excessive amounts on uniform some of which the logo is invisible,also the logo could be deemed religious.
Ridiculous idea , unfair on families of all sizes.
Flipping ridiculous, bad enough that you have to spend a fortune on polo shirts/tee shirts/ jumpers, sports uniform etc.
School identity is important, but insisting all items of clothing carry the logo is nothing but profiteering. Enforcing a single supplier of said clothing is creating a monopoly helping to reinforce the high uniform prices.
Do the teachers have to wear a uniform- and if so are they subsidised by the Private Company in charge of these Academies.?
I am happy to buy tie and blazer...but not trousers at twenty pounds..it's too much money
This is disgusting, especially when some parents are having trouble paying for food to put on a table. Not everyone can afford it.
Absolutely ridiculous, they did the same thing at my cousin's school a few years back, sold substandard pants that had a school logo on for a greatly inflated price
Money grabbing! £20 for trousers that will need replacing within a month. Absolutely ridiculous!
The shouldn't have to wear logo uniform, some families are in poverty as it it.
Ridiculous.It's like taking a step backwards.As if some parents aren't struggling enough without this extra expense.
This is a ridiculous money making racket. Parents are really struggling to feed their kids and keep a roof over their heads and a jumper /sweatshirt /blazer with the logo on is surficient to make it a uniform. Not everyone earns as much as the governors and academy executives.
Absolutely terrible!
The school uniform dose not need a logo on every piece told clothing and not all parents can afford to pay for it is a stupid idea there is nothing wrong with just having the logo on the jumpers like it has always been
Don't see the point you won't see the logo I have one child what about people that have more than one I'm a single parent its hard enough to survive
They are running the school into the ground how long before it closes with making forced redundancies which they say are voluntary it very sad time for the school
Absolutely no need for logos on trousers and skirts. Reducing cost for parents in financial hardship by allowing generic pants and skirts