Stop the logo madness at Heysham High (Bay Leadership Academy
169 Comments
M
Melanie 2
8 years ago
Sort your school before you sort the uniform
E
Emma Hooper
8 years ago
School skirts do not need a logo. It makes it even harder for those struggling to afford uniforms.
S
Steve Daly
8 years ago
The cost of uniforms is already damaging to families on low incomes. This is merely adding insult by charging poor people for advertising!
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Uniform should be provided like it would in a job if they want you to wear a logo
K
Kelly beswick
8 years ago
Disgusting
S
Sue
8 years ago
I dont mind purchasing the Blazer. But i think its ridiculous having to buy trousers/skirts with Emblem too.
S
Stephen Tomlinson
8 years ago
I think this a daft idea no one likes change especially when money is tight.
L
Leisha
8 years ago
I think this is absolutely ridiculous, the uniform was already changed a few years ago and not only that to hike the price up where parents allready struggle enough as it is.
Wow just seen the new logo is there any point it's tiny and hardly visible on the black uniform. School is for children to learn not a fashion show.
M
Mary
8 years ago
Parents should not need to pay out for school uniforms from the school A colour yes but not a logo ... maybe have a see on badge that wouldn’t cost so much ???
M
M James-Barber
8 years ago
Any skirt or trousers of the right colour. If you have to have a logo get them massed produced to sew on
J
Janthea Chuck
8 years ago
With a low socio area. Clear that many have tight budgets and your expecting them after the children being off for 6 weeks and draining all resources to spend more on uniform.
A
Amanda Armes
8 years ago
Because people need money more than a.school logo.
R
Rachel warren
8 years ago
This is extortion .
T
Tanya Williamson
8 years ago
Children do not need branded uniforms their parents can't afford, in order to learn.
J
joanne ollerton
8 years ago
absolutely no need for this !!! especially in a school known to be in an area of deprivation !! last thing that parents need/ stigma put on children !!! disgraceful !
S
Stuart Richmond
8 years ago
Its a school, not a model agency.
F
Faye penny
8 years ago
This is disgusting and discriminatory. Please rethink your uniform policy, and in fact your choice to become an academy. Is there no going back?
D
Diana Mountain
8 years ago
Don’t get hung up on looks and surface changes. LRGS try to make spots kit have logos on shorts - as if one logo isn’t enough. No one will look at trouser /skirt logos.
A
Allan wild
8 years ago
Absolute joke, more expense when there is no need in the slightest. A logo thats in the same colour as the material so won't even be seen !!!!
J
Joanne wilkinson
8 years ago
No need for this, it’s a step too far in this area where a lot of families struggle financially.
Sort your school before you sort the uniform
School skirts do not need a logo. It makes it even harder for those struggling to afford uniforms.
The cost of uniforms is already damaging to families on low incomes. This is merely adding insult by charging poor people for advertising!
Uniform should be provided like it would in a job if they want you to wear a logo
Disgusting
I dont mind purchasing the Blazer. But i think its ridiculous having to buy trousers/skirts with Emblem too.
I think this a daft idea no one likes change especially when money is tight.
I think this is absolutely ridiculous, the uniform was already changed a few years ago and not only that to hike the price up where parents allready struggle enough as it is. Wow just seen the new logo is there any point it's tiny and hardly visible on the black uniform. School is for children to learn not a fashion show.
Parents should not need to pay out for school uniforms from the school A colour yes but not a logo ... maybe have a see on badge that wouldn’t cost so much ???
Any skirt or trousers of the right colour. If you have to have a logo get them massed produced to sew on
With a low socio area. Clear that many have tight budgets and your expecting them after the children being off for 6 weeks and draining all resources to spend more on uniform.
Because people need money more than a.school logo.
This is extortion .
Children do not need branded uniforms their parents can't afford, in order to learn.
absolutely no need for this !!! especially in a school known to be in an area of deprivation !! last thing that parents need/ stigma put on children !!! disgraceful !
Its a school, not a model agency.
This is disgusting and discriminatory. Please rethink your uniform policy, and in fact your choice to become an academy. Is there no going back?
Don’t get hung up on looks and surface changes. LRGS try to make spots kit have logos on shorts - as if one logo isn’t enough. No one will look at trouser /skirt logos.
Absolute joke, more expense when there is no need in the slightest. A logo thats in the same colour as the material so won't even be seen !!!!
No need for this, it’s a step too far in this area where a lot of families struggle financially.