Skip to main content

Stop removing prescription insurance coverage for state employees hired before July of 2011

168 Comments

L
LaWanda G Saddler
2 years ago

This will have a negative impact on me as a retired State of Maryland Employee.

M
Matthew Kirschenbaum
2 years ago Featured

I joined the University of Maryland in 2001, where today I am very proud to carry the title Distinguished University Professor. I have chosen to build my career and my life here at UMD and in Maryland. I expect the state to live up to its commitments.

J
Jessica C White
2 years ago

Lack of access to prescription medication is more than a financial burden for retired state employees. It signals that the state is willing to legislate death and illness.

R
Ryan Holder
2 years ago

I think keeping prescription coverage is necessary for the retired workforce

N
Neil Fraistat
2 years ago

I worked at UMD for over 40 years, retiring in 2020. That whole time, I and others similarly loyal have planned around this benefit. Many of us will be sorely affected by the removal of this promised benefit.

C
Caroline Eades
2 years ago

This change means that the more you work for Maryland, the less you receive.... Unfair and unproductive decision.

M
Mary A
2 years ago

FOR NELSON

T
Thomas C Moser Jr
2 years ago

The State of Maryland's historically good benefits are extremely important to maintaining a talented workforce. This sort of benefits reduction is extremely harmful. Please leave things as they are.

T
Thomas Gleason
2 years ago

I have been a faithful state employee for over 25 years. One of the reasons for remaining a state employee has been the benefits and expected retirement benefits. Please grandfather in employees and retirees who were hired prior to 2011.

W
William Bentley
2 years ago

I’ve worked for the university for over thirty years and witnessed many policy changes (eg., tuition remission for dependents), but in no case that I can recall has the state NOT grandfathered those hired with one policy to accommodate a new one. Bad precedent and calls into question the commitment of the State to its employees.

M
Martha Nell Smith
2 years ago

I stayed at the U of Maryland because of this (and other) guarantees in my retirement. I've devoted myself to this outstanding public institution and its students for 38 years when I could have gone elswhwere. Why are you taking this guaranteed benefit away? It seems cruel, unappreciative, and uncaring.

J
JOHN AUCHARD
2 years ago

This change will have a significant and difficult effect on my health care.

C
Christina Walter
2 years ago

UMD expects me to honor the terms of my employment, so Maryland should likewise honor the initial terms of my employment.

I
Isabel Lloyd
2 years ago

Please consider whether this change is would be considered a breach of contract. Also, employees would offered benefits like prescription drug coverage to help make up for lower salaries than the private sector so planning on having coverage has been a factor in retirement planning.

D
Deborah Vidmar
2 years ago

Please keep prescription drug coverage for retirees for the state of Maryland.

L
Liz Wincek
2 years ago

I work for the UMCP and plan to retire in 2 years, which will put my retirement age at 59, which is several years until I can collect Medicare. I will need prescription coverage until then..... Thank you-

A
Ada Biesma
2 years ago

To remove the prescription coverage is very unfair and will impact many workers and their families.

A
Anonymous
2 years ago

"without this benefit I would not be able to afford my medications"

D
David Sicilia
2 years ago

For 30 years, the state has promised me this benefit. Now it will break the promise and take it away the day I retire?!

A
Anonymous
2 years ago

As a state employee, this change is very concerning. Retirees deserve the benefits they were promised, especially when they have dedicated so many years of service to the State of Maryland.