Skip to main content

Stop IDC

70 Comments

K
Kevin
8 years ago

We have laws for a reason. What the city has chosen to do with this IDC is illegal, plain and simple. This is what happens when you allow small town politics to intervene with federal land ownership rights.

N
Natalie Schoeny
8 years ago

This is a sensitive issue. There are aged properties that need to be replaced and enhanced for the taxes this area is subjected to.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago Featured

If current zoning regulations are not adequately serving the neighborhoods of Mt. Lookout and Hyde Park, then the proper way to effect change is by altering the zoning map or creating new zoning districts, NOT by creating an onerous review process that only applies to property owners in these neighborhoods. Evonne Morales, Registered Architect

J
James Haven
8 years ago

James Haven

J
john hueber
8 years ago

fundamental property rights are under attack here. if a subdivide meets with current zoning restrictions it should be allowed.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago Featured

If the city wants to stop growth they should say so. The imposition of arbitrary criteria to land development appears to be an infringement on a property owners right to use their own property in accordance with current zoning and building codes.

J
Joseph Bochenek
8 years ago

A law is a law and you must abide by it! Case closed!!

M
Matthew Kuhnell
8 years ago

Delay is the enemy of progress! These developments add property value to all of those who live in the communities.

D
Don Waugh
8 years ago

A halt on development will only slow down badly needed improvements.

R
Rachael Palermo
8 years ago

The city should either follow its zoning laws or change the zoning laws.