Skip to main content

STOP FULLERTOWN FLATS

109 Comments

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Follow the 2040 law

B
Bernadette Tomko
6 years ago

The size of this building is over shadowing all structures in the neighborhood. Disrespectful and damaging to the neighbors, property values around this structure and to quality of life. This is a downtown or uptown commercial district structure. WE DO NOT WANT THIS CONSTRUCTION. STOP DESTROYING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD!

M
Mark Webster
6 years ago

Parking is already a problem in this area. Developer needs to provide more off street parking for that many units.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

This would be disastrous for parking not only for residents and homeowners but also for friends who are visiting.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

I’m most upset by the fact that they think they don’t need parking and I’ve heard over and over that younger people aren’t using cars....I live in a 4-plex on the block where all residences are 2 car household millennials. 10 spaces for that many units is not enough and there is not enough street space to support the additional cars.

H
Holly Robbins
6 years ago Featured

I live 2 blocks from this project. It seems like it does not conform to current or projected requirements for our neighborhood. I'm all for more density; it is generally more eco. But I am against developers getting to do whatever they want with no regard for the neighborhood.

A
Annette S Mayers
6 years ago Featured

Such a mistake! Winter time parking is bad enough especially for elderly residents who have a devil of a time when single side of street parking is in effect. It isn't fare. It will ruin the neighborhood.

T
Timothy Larson
6 years ago

As an important bus route for commuters and students Grand Ave is already a problem street that is not wide enough and is already packed with parked cars.

Z
Zylpha Gregerson
6 years ago

The proposed development of Fullerton Flats is not acceptable. The building structure is too large for the block. The parking request is NOT possible with a block that already has limited parking; i.e. think winter and one-side parking!

B
Beverly Reid
6 years ago

Not a good fit for the neighborhood

C
Candace Ehler
6 years ago

Follow what the law says. The only reason to grant the variance is allow the real estate developers to make more money.

B
Bob Reid
6 years ago

This is a very bad idea for Mpls and this neighborhood

T
Tricia Wright
6 years ago

I believe the building needs to increase the parking in order to be a viable project in my neighborhood.

J
Jackie Gaustad
6 years ago

This is a bad idea, taking green space away, no place for 23+ to park their cars, this is MN they will all have at least one car and no affordable housing. Shame, it's all about developer greed.

M
Mark Prigge
6 years ago

That's far too many apartments for such a small piece of land. All of the additional cars parked on the street will choke it off, especially in winter.

C
Chris Batson
6 years ago

This proposed project will in no way shape or form enhance or benefit our neighborhood and will only exacerbate current problems we have and fly directly in the face of the 2040 reforms

C
Catherine L Fuller
6 years ago

Please STOP the over development of residential neighborhoods! Grand Avenue between 47th and 48th Street is already full of parked cars, how can a developer possibly justify building a huge, out of scale apartment building like this and not provide any parking? Is he going to only rent to bussers, bikers, or what?

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Please listen to residents concerns.

J
Janet Eddy
6 years ago

A good friend lives in the neighborhood and this new building would greatly negatively impact the character of the area.

P
patrick rains
6 years ago

I agree this is completely inappropriate for this neighborhood. This development would never pass under the new 2040 plan, which is already plans for aggressive . And with no affordable housing this is just a money maker for the developer at the expense of the community.