Hello,
We are writing to you to voice our concerns and dissatisfaction with the Spatial Modelling 2 exam that was sat by all second year geographers on the afternoon of Tuesday 21st May.
The format of the exam itself is not the subject of our grievance, as it was exactly as we had been advised in lectures throughout the second term, and in the revision session that took place in the week prior to the exam. The questions, though very challenging, were of a similar style to those which had been given to us in lectures during the second term and the split of the examination into two parts, likewise, was no surprise. However, the issues that we have with the exam are twofold, namely:
1) The sheer amount of questions
2) The short amount of time that we were given to answer them (90 minutes)
The total amount of marks on offer in the exam was 126, which seems extremely high given the amount of time available to complete them, averaging at 1.4 marks per minute. We feel that this was an inadequate amount of time for such a challenging examination paper that required the respondent to think through many of the more difficult concepts of the course to successfully answer questions. Consequently, the short duration of the exam resulted in a high number of students simply running out of time. The final two questions were worth 25 marks – or 20% of the exam paper – yet many people simply had no time to answer them in a way appropriate for such valuable questions. In most cases, this was not due to a lack of knowledge: the previous questions in section B (some of which were worth 10 or 15 marks too) also required thorough answers, meaning that not enough time remained to also provide good-quality answers to the final questions.
There is great concern amongst students who sat the exam that this lack of time will result in them obtaining disappointing marks that do not fairly reflect their ability to answer the questions that were set. For most people, had the exam been 2 hours long instead of 90 minutes, their answers would have reflected their ability to answer the questions as they would have had sufficient time to complete them in their entirety. Unfortunately, due to the lack of time, they were not able to do so.
We wish to stress that this letter is not a complaint about a very difficult exam. We expect exams at this university to be hard, to make us think through our knowledge of the subject and to push us out of our comfort zones. However, in order to do this, we expect to have a sufficient amount of time to answer the questions well, and we do not believe that we had this in this exam, which seems very unfair.
Many thanks and we look forward to hearing from you regarding this matter.
Yours sincerely,
The undersigned.
Updates
May 25, 2013
I have been reading through all your accounts of how the time pressure impacted your performance and it makes me even more certain that the current structure was unfair. We are currently finalizing a formal letter to the department head based on these shared experiences. Please keep checking for updates as I press for a fair resolution to this assessment.
May 25, 2013
Seeing the waves of frustration pouring in from my classmates makes me realize just how universal this struggle really was. We finally have enough momentum to show the department that this isn't just about my own exam paper.
6 Comments
Seriously? 1.4 marks per minute for a spatial modelling exam is way too fast. we need a resit or at least a curve.
The exam was way too long. I know the material but there just was not enough time to actually write down the answers.
was rushing the whole time and still missed 20% of the paper. stressed out big time.
Everyone left the hall feeling like they failed not because we didnt know the stuff but because we ran out of time. please look into this.
126 marks is ridiculous for 90 mins. i barely got halfway through the paper before they told us to put pens down. fix this.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
Hello,
We are writing to you to voice our concerns and dissatisfaction with the Spatial Modelling 2 exam that was sat by all second year geographers on the afternoon of Tuesday 21st May.
The format of the exam itself is not the subject of our grievance, as it was exactly as we had been advised in lectures throughout the second term, and in the revision session that took place in the week prior to the exam. The questions, though very challenging, were of a similar style to those which had been given to us in lectures during the second term and the split of the examination into two parts, likewise, was no surprise. However, the issues that we have with the exam are twofold, namely:
1) The sheer amount of questions
2) The short amount of time that we were given to answer them (90 minutes)
The total amount of marks on offer in the exam was 126, which seems extremely high given the amount of time available to complete them, averaging at 1.4 marks per minute. We feel that this was an inadequate amount of time for such a challenging examination paper that required the respondent to think through many of the more difficult concepts of the course to successfully answer questions. Consequently, the short duration of the exam resulted in a high number of students simply running out of time. The final two questions were worth 25 marks – or 20% of the exam paper – yet many people simply had no time to answer them in a way appropriate for such valuable questions. In most cases, this was not due to a lack of knowledge: the previous questions in section B (some of which were worth 10 or 15 marks too) also required thorough answers, meaning that not enough time remained to also provide good-quality answers to the final questions.
There is great concern amongst students who sat the exam that this lack of time will result in them obtaining disappointing marks that do not fairly reflect their ability to answer the questions that were set. For most people, had the exam been 2 hours long instead of 90 minutes, their answers would have reflected their ability to answer the questions as they would have had sufficient time to complete them in their entirety. Unfortunately, due to the lack of time, they were not able to do so.
We wish to stress that this letter is not a complaint about a very difficult exam. We expect exams at this university to be hard, to make us think through our knowledge of the subject and to push us out of our comfort zones. However, in order to do this, we expect to have a sufficient amount of time to answer the questions well, and we do not believe that we had this in this exam, which seems very unfair.
Many thanks and we look forward to hearing from you regarding this matter.
Yours sincerely,
The undersigned.
Updates
May 25, 2013
I have been reading through all your accounts of how the time pressure impacted your performance and it makes me even more certain that the current structure was unfair. We are currently finalizing a formal letter to the department head based on these shared experiences. Please keep checking for updates as I press for a fair resolution to this assessment.
May 25, 2013
Seeing the waves of frustration pouring in from my classmates makes me realize just how universal this struggle really was. We finally have enough momentum to show the department that this isn't just about my own exam paper.
6 Comments
LITERALLY impossible to finish. i spent way too long on the first page and then had to rush the end. so unfair.
Seriously? 1.4 marks per minute for a spatial modelling exam is way too fast. we need a resit or at least a curve.
The exam was way too long. I know the material but there just was not enough time to actually write down the answers.
was rushing the whole time and still missed 20% of the paper. stressed out big time.
Everyone left the hall feeling like they failed not because we didnt know the stuff but because we ran out of time. please look into this.
126 marks is ridiculous for 90 mins. i barely got halfway through the paper before they told us to put pens down. fix this.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 100 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
LITERALLY impossible to finish. i spent way too long on the first page and then had to rush the end. so unfair.