South canoe property owner and resident. I oppose the maintenance yard because it would increase heavy traffic in the area as well as congest the 2 way stops on hiway 97 which are already a crapshoot to try and get onto the hiway in the mornings. Maintenance crews and trucks added to that would be a mess every morning leaving canoe on 10th
D
Donna Jensen
10 years ago
Not a good use of land or building
J
Julie Kentel
10 years ago
This would just be wrong. A works yard like this should be in the industrial area
S
Stephen Williams
10 years ago
Salmon Arm has other areas designated for Industrial use. A Works complex does not belong in the middle of a rural farming area.
A
Alexa Kalina
10 years ago
Former resident of Salmon Arm/Silver Creek
C
Corinne Christie
10 years ago
As a resident living within the playground speed zone of klahani park, i can attest to the fact that the current traffic (including city vehicles) treats the 30km/hr speed limit as a unenforced suggestion. I can imagine what sort of impact this proposed development will have on our community. All the current gravel pit traffic is bad enough. Anyone who has to use the 10th Ave and 97B crossing should know that this proposal is an alarming, half-baked idea for this and so many other reasons.
C
Carola SUo
10 years ago
Resident of Salmon Arm, family in South Canoe
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Absolutely not the city of salmon arm has their pit on tenth st already and do not need to expand or build another.
L
Lazlo Salai
10 years ago
No "Public Works Yard" in my back yard. Thank You.
L
Lori Jenks
10 years ago
More traffic means more potential danger for the many horse/riders, mountain bikers and other athletes who use this area to train.
F
Ferne Johnson
10 years ago
Featured
resident of South Canoe and I use this road 3 x day. I would not want to see more traffic in that area, and specifically at the Hwy 97B and 10th Ave intersection, it is dangerous enough as it is now!
S
Saralea Spence
10 years ago
Salmon Arm, BC
T
Tim Gallant
10 years ago
This facility has no place in a residential area.
I
Isabel Reinertson
10 years ago
I do not deem a works yard as an appropriate use for this site.
T
Timothy Woodall
10 years ago
Seems like it would be better suited to the industrial park!!!!
B
Brian Darbyshire
10 years ago
south canoe resident.
K
Kevin Bushell
10 years ago
Featured
The city wouldn't build a playground or school in an industrial park, so why would they think it's ok to build an industrial site in a residential community? Think about it people....
N
Nikki Wilson
10 years ago
This belongs in the industrial park!
C
Cheryl Niemi
10 years ago
Salmon Arm, Tappen Area. This belongs in the industrial area, not South Canoe.
T
Tara Gallant
10 years ago
I think it is great to expand the Field of Dreams. The Public Works facility belongs in the Industrial Park or in behind Fisher Funeral, not in a residential neighborhood!
South canoe property owner and resident. I oppose the maintenance yard because it would increase heavy traffic in the area as well as congest the 2 way stops on hiway 97 which are already a crapshoot to try and get onto the hiway in the mornings. Maintenance crews and trucks added to that would be a mess every morning leaving canoe on 10th
Not a good use of land or building
This would just be wrong. A works yard like this should be in the industrial area
Salmon Arm has other areas designated for Industrial use. A Works complex does not belong in the middle of a rural farming area.
Former resident of Salmon Arm/Silver Creek
As a resident living within the playground speed zone of klahani park, i can attest to the fact that the current traffic (including city vehicles) treats the 30km/hr speed limit as a unenforced suggestion. I can imagine what sort of impact this proposed development will have on our community. All the current gravel pit traffic is bad enough. Anyone who has to use the 10th Ave and 97B crossing should know that this proposal is an alarming, half-baked idea for this and so many other reasons.
Resident of Salmon Arm, family in South Canoe
Absolutely not the city of salmon arm has their pit on tenth st already and do not need to expand or build another.
No "Public Works Yard" in my back yard. Thank You.
More traffic means more potential danger for the many horse/riders, mountain bikers and other athletes who use this area to train.
resident of South Canoe and I use this road 3 x day. I would not want to see more traffic in that area, and specifically at the Hwy 97B and 10th Ave intersection, it is dangerous enough as it is now!
Salmon Arm, BC
This facility has no place in a residential area.
I do not deem a works yard as an appropriate use for this site.
Seems like it would be better suited to the industrial park!!!!
south canoe resident.
The city wouldn't build a playground or school in an industrial park, so why would they think it's ok to build an industrial site in a residential community? Think about it people....
This belongs in the industrial park!
Salmon Arm, Tappen Area. This belongs in the industrial area, not South Canoe.
I think it is great to expand the Field of Dreams. The Public Works facility belongs in the Industrial Park or in behind Fisher Funeral, not in a residential neighborhood!