Skip to main content

Oppose the Sign Code - South Salt Lake

89 Comments

L
Linda Carr
5 years ago

This is not the right time with Covid out of hand to address this matter. Please reconsider.

T
Travis Chatterton
5 years ago

This seems like the wrong thing for the Planning Commission to be working on. SSL should be helping business Owners not hurting them.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

This sounds like it would be a safety hazard as well since the signs would be hard to read. Why would they even think this is a good idea?

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

I work for a sign manufacturer and this will affect my ability to provide for my family along with many others.

G
Gordie Rogers
5 years ago

Please leave sign code as is

D
David Lee
5 years ago

The main question I always have when reviewing these types of changes is WHY? even if you have people complaining, how many? 20? 50? 100? even if it's 250 people complaining, that is less than 1% of the population. You are going to change/diminish a businesses ability to increase profitability and thus increase your tax revenue because less than 1% of people have an outspoken opinion?

S
Scott McLeod
5 years ago

we need signs for our businesses. this helps our business grow and easy to find.

E
Evelyn Salgado
5 years ago

ima just say is that if you like to ban it’s all up to u but I would say to just stop all these things that are happening with salt lake sign

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

This year has been particularly difficult on businesses and adding more to their burdens with a sign code that will restrict their advertisement seems a poor way to improve economic conditions. Companies spend billions of dollars a year on marketing and branding and this proposed sign code will inhibit what they are able to do, and possibly, render any branding currently in place as non-conforming, putting additional burdens on companies.

S
Surya Bastakoti
5 years ago

Hell yeah

B
Ben Olson
5 years ago

This may be one of the most strict sign ordinances I've ever seen. Please do not proceed with this as it will be damaging to business and economic growth in the area.

E
Elizabeth Macqueen
5 years ago

I'm curious as to why the city council members think it is a great idea to place such an unnecessary and onerous financial burden on small businesses during a worsening pandemic which is putting them in an extremely precarious position with constant worry about being able to stay afloat. Do the city council members realize that the city's own financial fate is tied to that of their local businesses?

J
JAQUI GIBBONS
5 years ago

We have great signs on our building and lit in our lawn. We want the freedom to choose our own sign and not pay extra money. We want to stand out, not conform to somebody's idea of what they think our sign should be.

T
Tiffany Chynoweth
5 years ago

This seems like the wrong thing for the Planning Commission to be working on. SSL has plenty of areas that need change and guidance. Businesses have had a hard enough year with out crazy unneccesary sign rules and changes. Let businesses work on bringing in customers and revenue and the planning commission focus on crosswalks, parks, parking etc for all the high density housing we now have here.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

No new sign regulations

J
Jeff Miller
5 years ago Featured

As owner of one of the largest companies in the city, I would like for this to be reconsidered with input from the business community. I would be happy to be part of that process as I agree that the sign ordinances need to be updated.

H
Harley Griffith
5 years ago

Good signage increases business which increases revenue and jobs. These regulations would do the opposite

M
Michael Holt
5 years ago

As a local business in SSL, I feel that additional involvement and conversation should occur as this ordinance would likely significantly impact businesses with unintended consequences.

R
Rex Allen
5 years ago

We like the freedom to choose our signs.

T
Tyler Anderson
5 years ago

Owner of ASA INSURANCE Been in south salt lake since the early 80’s