The building should be allowed to be any taller than the one that is there now. The design should have to fit in with the style of the surrounding community...either Spanish or contemporary stone like the YMCA.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
3940 Wentwood Dr 75225
J
John Caraballo
10 years ago
2725 Milton Ave
D
Deborah driskill
10 years ago
This is absurd for a small village and will drive down property values for existing surrounding homeowners needlessly
K
Kaari Wicklund
10 years ago
It doesn't fit the neighborhood and will ruin the ambiance of that part of town where I have lived for 40 years all the store owners and developers knew the situation when they bought or opened their businesses
N
Nancy Dorn
10 years ago
Building is much too large.
R
ROSANNE BECK
10 years ago
i am all for a solution to the designated area, but this is too large. in my opinion it would be better developed like an extension of snider plaza w parking underground like preston center, maybe a 6-8 stores residential w stories with retail and restaurants underneath. that could actually have some park space included if it was done correctly. but this is too big, does not include the neighborhood feel and does not fit in in any way.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
This glass is not in harmony with University Park and surrounding SMU buildings...
R
Robert C Bailey
10 years ago
TOO BIG!!!
N
Nena McElfresh
10 years ago
3601 Stanford Ave, Dallas, 75225
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
3537 Asbury
D
Diane Williams
10 years ago
Too tall and no mirrors! This is not downtown Dallas!
M
Michele and Travis Spillman
10 years ago
3204 Purdue
K
Kimberly Pierce
10 years ago
Please don't sell this community short. We can do so much better!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Development is too bigg and too high. We are a small village and want to stay that way.
C
Cris Joiner
10 years ago
Just say NO!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
2925 Stanford
S
Shannon Stamm
10 years ago
I have concerns that this structure would have on traffic and safety of pedestrians around this area. Therefore, I am against this proposed building.
L
Leslie Kibby
10 years ago
4334 Glenwick Lane, 75205
L
Leslie Kibby
10 years ago
I really believe that the proposed building is far too tall for the surrounding area. It is too close to residential property to be that tall. I also think the increase in traffic will be a detriment to University Park.
The building should be allowed to be any taller than the one that is there now. The design should have to fit in with the style of the surrounding community...either Spanish or contemporary stone like the YMCA.
3940 Wentwood Dr 75225
2725 Milton Ave
This is absurd for a small village and will drive down property values for existing surrounding homeowners needlessly
It doesn't fit the neighborhood and will ruin the ambiance of that part of town where I have lived for 40 years all the store owners and developers knew the situation when they bought or opened their businesses
Building is much too large.
i am all for a solution to the designated area, but this is too large. in my opinion it would be better developed like an extension of snider plaza w parking underground like preston center, maybe a 6-8 stores residential w stories with retail and restaurants underneath. that could actually have some park space included if it was done correctly. but this is too big, does not include the neighborhood feel and does not fit in in any way.
This glass is not in harmony with University Park and surrounding SMU buildings...
TOO BIG!!!
3601 Stanford Ave, Dallas, 75225
3537 Asbury
Too tall and no mirrors! This is not downtown Dallas!
3204 Purdue
Please don't sell this community short. We can do so much better!
Development is too bigg and too high. We are a small village and want to stay that way.
Just say NO!
2925 Stanford
I have concerns that this structure would have on traffic and safety of pedestrians around this area. Therefore, I am against this proposed building.
4334 Glenwick Lane, 75205
I really believe that the proposed building is far too tall for the surrounding area. It is too close to residential property to be that tall. I also think the increase in traffic will be a detriment to University Park.