Skip to main content

Shared Murrell's Inlet

259 Comments

D
Dillon Young
9 years ago

Keep hunting in the inlet

W
William Yarbrough
9 years ago

It is time that the newcomers acclimated and quit trying to make us like them.

G
Greg Cameron
9 years ago

There are PLENTY of sanctuaries all around the area discussed. Leave MI alone !

C
Curtis Meurer
9 years ago

Duck hunters and duck stamps pay for bird habitat. Birder watchers do not.

J
Jo Cooper
9 years ago

The South jetty and Huntington Beach State Park has a designated bird sanctuary. Do not make the entire inlet one.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Dont take away the hunters rights to this area !

D
Drake Cassidy
9 years ago

Preserve our heritage.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Please leave the local hunting heritage alone and let hunting continue

J
Jeff Rost
9 years ago

Keep the hunting open. Sanctuary is not needed

G
Gibson Nolen
9 years ago

The sanctuary will help to diminish the Murrel's inlet waterfowler's hunting heritage do to it further restricting the hunting domain in Murrels inlet. Therefore we do not need a sanctuary in this area.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

This is simply not needed

R
Raymond Goodwin Jr
9 years ago

Hunting for legal species should not be hindered on public water. The shorebirds are not legal for harvest, therefore should have no danger brought on by hunting. One outdoor activity should not trump another.

W
William Brandon Finch
9 years ago

Keep hunting in MI.

T
Tim Nash
9 years ago

I'm standing against because this is simply another way to strip away the rights of use of our public waters

W
Will Newell
9 years ago

Keep MI open to hunting!

D
Derek Harrelson
9 years ago

If they didn't like it they should have moved somewhere else... It was legal before then and it should be legal after.

T
Thomas McClellan
9 years ago

Band Yankees!

R
Ryan Russell
9 years ago

Do not make it a bird sanctuary. Keep it open for all uses.

R
Richard Cothran
9 years ago

I support hunting

J
James Hancock
9 years ago

never bothered anyone