Skip to main content

Shared Murrell's Inlet

259 Comments

T
Tim Heilig
9 years ago Featured

Hunting has been allowed for so many years in my home of Murrells Inlet. It is a shame that a few folks have moved to the inlet and think that because they have piles of money they know what is best for everyone. What will be next no more harvesting of oysters? No fishing?

J
Joe Catalano
9 years ago

Let's keep hunting!

D
Dan Morgan
9 years ago

ENFORCE EXISTING LAWS. PERIOD.

S
Steven Watts
9 years ago

Waterfowl hunters are the true conservationists.

C
Chip Wolfe
9 years ago

Keep Murrells Inlet open for hunting. Generations have hunted there and the birds still come. No need to change anything.

G
Gina Watts
9 years ago

Keeping hunting rights

N
Nick Watts
9 years ago

Continue hunting rights on PUBLIC water.

D
Douglas morris
9 years ago

Thank you.

C
Curtis Dewey
9 years ago

Please keep Murrells Inlet open for hunting.

B
Brad turner
9 years ago

I'm on board with this.

B
Bryan Claud
9 years ago

No

J
Jason burton
9 years ago

Let murrells inlet stay the same as it's been for the last 50 years.

J
Jeremy Simmons
9 years ago

Hunters rights need protecting also.

J
Jeff harrison
9 years ago

Hunters rights should be protected

D
Dave Owens
9 years ago

The lost of opportunity for hunters will ultimately result in fewer, in this case, fowl to enjoy. Regardless of how you decide to enjoy them.

R
Robert Goodwin
9 years ago

The mir thought of MI becoming a bird sanctuary is sickening. The state park already has a bird sanctuary. I was born and raised in MI and I don't want this to pass!!!

B
Bobby kilbourne
9 years ago

"Bird sanctuary" is political tactics at it's finest. "Wealthy waterfront owners don't like hearing loud noises" should really be the name of this potential law.

J
Jaret Hucks
9 years ago

Less Government regulation.

D
Derek bell
9 years ago

Preserve our heritage

R
Ricky draper
9 years ago

This is ridiculous