Sign to Oppose A High-Speed Rail Bypass Through Southeastern Connecticut
229 Comments
C
Carole Nossek
9 years ago
No high speed rail.
S
Stephen bessette
9 years ago
Stop this plan
T
Tony Crane
9 years ago
I agree that we need a much better rail system to serve the north east corridor to bring us into the 21 st century but the FRA Tier 1 Bypass proposal provides very little real gain for extreme financial and environmental cost. Normally the kind of planning idea that gets tossed out at the first meeting.
H
Harriet Crane
9 years ago
Please know that I am in favor of the upgrade but NOT the bypass, for ALL the reasons stated above!
T
The Rev Cn Mark K J Robinson
9 years ago
Please remove Option 1 from the FRA plan
A
Ann Buffum
9 years ago
Please DO NOT change the rail line location.
J
Jesse Diggs
9 years ago
I have yet to see the problem identified that a new rail system will solve, and to see that problem in context with the cost involved. If a new rail system is a solution then a better approach would be a monorail system installed on the I-95 median strip. This uses land already federally owned, would force repairs of some bridges and highway structures, would be a highly visible alternative to those stuck on I-95 and would catapult mass transit into the 21st century rather than perpetuating a railroad system developed in the mid-19th century.
J
John Morris
9 years ago
Say No to Amtrak Old Saybrook/Kenyon bypass
M
martha hosp
9 years ago
I live in Westerly. RI and vehemently oppose a high-speed rail bypass through SE Connecticut and Rhode Island.
J
Jane Dixon
9 years ago
I oppose the proposed FRA tier one Old Saybrook bypass as it will greatly compromise the communities on the existing train line. What is proposed is a huge waste of tax payers money, and economically will furthe compromise many communities that are already struggling along the existing train line. Oberall an ill advised scheme, reeking of political junketing, favoritism and pork, with adverse environmental impacts to boot in addition to economic ones. Thank you,
Jane Dixon
Stonington, Connecticut
J
John Boone
9 years ago
I agree with the ambition of high speed rail travel in the Northeast Corridor but this current strategy is foolish.
M
MaryLys Jackson
9 years ago
The FRA? This is just insanity. What is really gained? 5 minutes to Boston or someone's company making millions of $$$ and destroying businesses, cutting up farms and historic areas. Something is rotten in this deal.
R
Rhona Heyl
9 years ago
Stop this craziness!!
G
George Brys
9 years ago
I am baffled that anyone would seriously think this plan could become reality. Use existing rights of way!!
J
Joe Gelb
9 years ago
I oppose this plan, or any other plan that doesn't use the existing railway area
R
Robin Hall
9 years ago
This must be STOPPED!! Terrible idea - who thinks this stuff up!!!!
T
Toby Halsey
9 years ago
Mystic is the most lucrative tourist attraction in CT. This proposal would wipe out both the Old Mystic Village and the Aquarium. How can this possibly make sense?
C
Courtney Moore
9 years ago
Do not ruin our towns!
J
Jason Michas
9 years ago
This is a waste of money that would not positively affect any of the locals it would harm nor would it have a substantial impact on railroad travelers. The money seems like it could be far better spent on other needed infrastructure projects.
No high speed rail.
Stop this plan
I agree that we need a much better rail system to serve the north east corridor to bring us into the 21 st century but the FRA Tier 1 Bypass proposal provides very little real gain for extreme financial and environmental cost. Normally the kind of planning idea that gets tossed out at the first meeting.
Please know that I am in favor of the upgrade but NOT the bypass, for ALL the reasons stated above!
Please remove Option 1 from the FRA plan
Please DO NOT change the rail line location.
I have yet to see the problem identified that a new rail system will solve, and to see that problem in context with the cost involved. If a new rail system is a solution then a better approach would be a monorail system installed on the I-95 median strip. This uses land already federally owned, would force repairs of some bridges and highway structures, would be a highly visible alternative to those stuck on I-95 and would catapult mass transit into the 21st century rather than perpetuating a railroad system developed in the mid-19th century.
Say No to Amtrak Old Saybrook/Kenyon bypass
I live in Westerly. RI and vehemently oppose a high-speed rail bypass through SE Connecticut and Rhode Island.
I oppose the proposed FRA tier one Old Saybrook bypass as it will greatly compromise the communities on the existing train line. What is proposed is a huge waste of tax payers money, and economically will furthe compromise many communities that are already struggling along the existing train line. Oberall an ill advised scheme, reeking of political junketing, favoritism and pork, with adverse environmental impacts to boot in addition to economic ones. Thank you, Jane Dixon Stonington, Connecticut
I agree with the ambition of high speed rail travel in the Northeast Corridor but this current strategy is foolish.
The FRA? This is just insanity. What is really gained? 5 minutes to Boston or someone's company making millions of $$$ and destroying businesses, cutting up farms and historic areas. Something is rotten in this deal.
Stop this craziness!!
I am baffled that anyone would seriously think this plan could become reality. Use existing rights of way!!
I oppose this plan, or any other plan that doesn't use the existing railway area
This must be STOPPED!! Terrible idea - who thinks this stuff up!!!!
Mystic is the most lucrative tourist attraction in CT. This proposal would wipe out both the Old Mystic Village and the Aquarium. How can this possibly make sense?
Do not ruin our towns!
This is a waste of money that would not positively affect any of the locals it would harm nor would it have a substantial impact on railroad travelers. The money seems like it could be far better spent on other needed infrastructure projects.
[email protected]