This type of development is so wrong for a community like Eagle Harbor. We already have to many speeders in the area and adding such a huge development would impact the traffic,schools and neighborhoods in a negative way. I am strongly opposed to this.Marine Drive is already busy enough with cyclists and vehicles trying to commute.
C
Carole Burns
5 years ago
This high density plan is unacceptable
and would definitely get our current mayor voted out of office.
V
Venise Pearson
5 years ago
It is very inappropriate to build this type of high density housing in a quiet single family residential area. We will welcome 10 new families to our neighbourhood, not the proposed hoards.
P
Phil Seagle
6 years ago
Featured
Eagle Harbour is a small close-knit community where many of the residents live because of that community feeling. The proposed development in no way conforms to this. Far too many people, too many cars and insufficient infrastructure to accommodate this proposed development. I am totally opposed to the development.
M
Monika Wilson
6 years ago
I am strongly opposed to this development.
D
Dennis Paul Bradley Wilson
6 years ago
This development density is not appropriate for this community.
L
Loni Robinson
6 years ago
We are very opposed to a housing development of this size.
T
Tom Duguid
6 years ago
Until the infrastructure (schools, transit, amenities) around here can be enlarged, this is too many homes to add to this neighbourhood!
P
Phyllis Scott
6 years ago
Why in this time of a dreaded virus are there plans to build this great number of homes in close proximity to each other?
T
Tommy Gerschman
6 years ago
new developments need to fit into the communities they are going including transportation / access considerations! A dangerous road area to start with!
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
We do not agree with this property development
K
Kim Rosin
6 years ago
This neighbourhood would be ruined with such an intense concentration of housing. The impact on traffic, amenities, natural parks and walks would be horrendous. Keep it at 10 units by all means but 67+ is ridiculous!
D
Debra Kahane-Goldberg
6 years ago
This will create many problems for the area.
M
Mina Badie
6 years ago
Please . Stop destroying our neighborhood.
J
John Mast
6 years ago
Featured
We have strong concerns about the density being proposed here and are not in support of the number of units proposed for the development. Quarter acre lots for single family homes would be acceptable. Likely that’s 10 or 12 lots with services.
J
Judith Hafey
6 years ago
Extremely high density of latest proposal totally inappropriate to size of site and for preservation of present neighbourhood character. The developer should respect the proposal as already approved by Council.
R
Richard Scott
6 years ago
No way going from 10 homes to 67 townhomes is even close to okay
E
Elaine Grotefeld
6 years ago
Featured
A development of this size does not fit, is not true to the intent of the OCP, is environmentally risky and will be a disaster in terms of overcrowding at our small park and beach, and traffic in the area with small children etc
V
Vivian gerschman
6 years ago
Absolutely NOT
Have you seen the traffic on marine drive and Westport
M
Mats Gerschman
6 years ago
This project should be stopped in its early tracks. Eagle Harbour’s neighbourhood characteristics is single family homes with a friendly neighbourhood where neighbours know each other, stop to talk and care about each other. We have lived here since 1987 and cherish our quiet neighbourhood . The project does NOT align with the OCP. The OCP calls for safe neighbourhoods, less traffic and higher density in certain designated areas such as Horseshoe Bay, Upper Lands and Ambleside/ Taylor way. Not Eagle Harbour! It also calls for saving neighbourhood characteristics. The traffic would be horrendous with exits to an already too busy Marine Drive( in a curve) or a steep slope and curve on Westport Road. Buses only run every 30 minutes. You need a car to get to schools and shops. The so-called ‘traffic study’ presented by the developer is useless as it is using incorrect data and assumptions. The District has attempted to put in traffic calming measures around the school. This would completely work in the opposite direction.
This type of development is so wrong for a community like Eagle Harbor. We already have to many speeders in the area and adding such a huge development would impact the traffic,schools and neighborhoods in a negative way. I am strongly opposed to this.Marine Drive is already busy enough with cyclists and vehicles trying to commute.
This high density plan is unacceptable and would definitely get our current mayor voted out of office.
It is very inappropriate to build this type of high density housing in a quiet single family residential area. We will welcome 10 new families to our neighbourhood, not the proposed hoards.
Eagle Harbour is a small close-knit community where many of the residents live because of that community feeling. The proposed development in no way conforms to this. Far too many people, too many cars and insufficient infrastructure to accommodate this proposed development. I am totally opposed to the development.
I am strongly opposed to this development.
This development density is not appropriate for this community.
We are very opposed to a housing development of this size.
Until the infrastructure (schools, transit, amenities) around here can be enlarged, this is too many homes to add to this neighbourhood!
Why in this time of a dreaded virus are there plans to build this great number of homes in close proximity to each other?
new developments need to fit into the communities they are going including transportation / access considerations! A dangerous road area to start with!
We do not agree with this property development
This neighbourhood would be ruined with such an intense concentration of housing. The impact on traffic, amenities, natural parks and walks would be horrendous. Keep it at 10 units by all means but 67+ is ridiculous!
This will create many problems for the area.
Please . Stop destroying our neighborhood.
We have strong concerns about the density being proposed here and are not in support of the number of units proposed for the development. Quarter acre lots for single family homes would be acceptable. Likely that’s 10 or 12 lots with services.
Extremely high density of latest proposal totally inappropriate to size of site and for preservation of present neighbourhood character. The developer should respect the proposal as already approved by Council.
No way going from 10 homes to 67 townhomes is even close to okay
A development of this size does not fit, is not true to the intent of the OCP, is environmentally risky and will be a disaster in terms of overcrowding at our small park and beach, and traffic in the area with small children etc
Absolutely NOT Have you seen the traffic on marine drive and Westport
This project should be stopped in its early tracks. Eagle Harbour’s neighbourhood characteristics is single family homes with a friendly neighbourhood where neighbours know each other, stop to talk and care about each other. We have lived here since 1987 and cherish our quiet neighbourhood . The project does NOT align with the OCP. The OCP calls for safe neighbourhoods, less traffic and higher density in certain designated areas such as Horseshoe Bay, Upper Lands and Ambleside/ Taylor way. Not Eagle Harbour! It also calls for saving neighbourhood characteristics. The traffic would be horrendous with exits to an already too busy Marine Drive( in a curve) or a steep slope and curve on Westport Road. Buses only run every 30 minutes. You need a car to get to schools and shops. The so-called ‘traffic study’ presented by the developer is useless as it is using incorrect data and assumptions. The District has attempted to put in traffic calming measures around the school. This would completely work in the opposite direction.