Skip to main content

Say NO to Z-17-05 Provision Zoning Change in Hurst, Texas

39 Comments

C
Christopher M Tracy
8 years ago Featured

Apartments are the wrong way to redevelop the area in question. Harrison Lane Elementary is already overcrowded and the crime rates are the highest in this area of Hurst. Another apartment complex would only exacerbate existing problems with our neighborhood.

S
Sara Ferrell
8 years ago

Seriously? There has to be SOMETHING better to build in this area!

R
Ryan Busby
8 years ago

This is not the long term solution to bring income to the city of Hurst. The city urgently needs to invest in projects that would attract gentrification. However, this proposal has the potential to cause further flight of property owners and improvers - the exact opposite of what this city needs. I would urge city council to think about competing with the cities to our north in regards to urban planning and development. I'd rather see incentives towards unique businesses to our area.

D
Delaney
8 years ago

Arlington was permanently negatively affected by too many apartment complexes. Don't let that happen to Hurst.

A
Aimee kimberling
8 years ago

No more apartments

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

I do not think this is in the best interest for the City of Hurst. The way the City is going about it seems underhanded and unethical. I vote NO!

J
Julie Thompson
8 years ago

Please no more low income. They hav been saying for years they were going to get rid of the apartment off Belaire and never have

T
Thomas F Dunigan
8 years ago

There are enough in south Hurst as it is.

J
Jenara Barnes
8 years ago

I wish to not have additional apartments in the lot bordering Valentine and Bedford-Euless Rd.

R
Roy Luttrell
8 years ago

No more apartments in S. Hurst!

A
Anonymous
8 years ago Featured

Overcrowding in schools. Traffic flow and congestion issues would increase. Local neighborhood would suffer privacy issues. Retail or neighborhood expansion would be more suitable here. Thank you.

R
Robb Lane
8 years ago

Would rather the area be used for single, mid-income, families - not a good place for low-income multi-family apartments. Suggest looking further south, somewhere across Trinity Blvd.

T
Tracy Bevil
8 years ago Featured

I think senior living would be better MUCH better for ALL, If the rent is low seniors would have more left of their SS check for food etc. Plus they most likely wouldn't bring crime and have to have the police there all the time like the ones on Cavender. Plus they wouldn't have children to add to the already overloaded schools as well. Seems like a great solution for everyone!!!

D
Dawn Williams
8 years ago

We say NO!!!!!!

B
Berniece Albrecht
8 years ago

No more apartments in Hurst - property values being affected

M
Megan Rex-Jeter
8 years ago Featured

They need to think this through more thoroughly, at least communicate with the school district that will be impacted.

C
Chad Froust
8 years ago

Build businesses not apartments.

C
Cristy
8 years ago

In my opinion,I think we should really focus on the apartments that are currently being occupied. Get them to where they are housing and not flop rooms.

M
Mark Westdyke
8 years ago

No more apartments Need to get rid of the ones we have now The ones on Pecan Street That's why our crime rate is so high They drain our resources away They make our school taxes higher

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

Hurst Blvd at IH820 is already beyond designed capacity. No more housing till the infrastructure is fixed.