Skip to main content

SAY NO TO MILTON WASTE SLURRY REPROCESSING PLANT

222 Comments

M
Morris Leach
12 years ago

Enquiry needed!

L
Lorna Barnard
12 years ago

A most unsuitable location,too close to The Home Farm Trust ,School and residential housing

D
David Baker
12 years ago

Should be sited in industrial area away from residential housing and schools.

M
Maggie Vickert
12 years ago

Not in the right location Im afraid .Need to think again

D
Duncan tavendale
12 years ago

Such a development is quite unsuitable on this location

A
Anonymous
12 years ago

too near to housing - wrong site for such a large plant

T
Truman Hunt
12 years ago

The roads around the site will be congested with large vehicles. If is difficult to exit the road at present and with development of 3 sites in the area already granted this will have a massive effect. Also it is to close to houses

S
Suzy Hunt
12 years ago

The proposed site is too close to a school, homes, a residential facility for disabled and office units all these are within 250m which the guidelines say is a minimum distance from the plant. The road to bring the waste in is not suitable for the increase on traffic for this and 3 other developments that have been granted planning in the surrounding area.

C
CHRIS OWEN
12 years ago

Allthough I am in favour of plants such as this converting waste into energy,however this is totally the wrong location for this one.It is to close to a residential area for one,and two Potash lane is unsuitable to take articulated lorrys and large tractors towing 20 tonne trailers of maize and silage with an entrance opposite homefarm trust and a school bus stop.surely it would be better on the existing landfill site at Appleford railway sidings.

S
simon dixey
12 years ago

right next to a school ? how ridiculous

K
kate blacklock
12 years ago

dont do it!

R
Roisin Rankin
12 years ago

This is an outrageous plan which will blot the landscape and ruin local housing and business. this should not be allowed to go through.

G
G Hawkins
12 years ago

What a ridiculous location to consider for such a plant!

L
Laura Bennett
12 years ago

Whilst I support the concept of what the anaerobic digester, it is clear when reading the application and comparing it with Environment Agency guidance, it is clear that this is not a suitable site for the proposed development.

G
geraldine bradley
12 years ago

This is a plant that should not be in a residential area. by all means site it in an industrial area.

R
Rowena Gaston
12 years ago

Strongly object to this development due to the likely increased traffic, unsightly 'blot' on the landscape and likely awful air pollution from such a plant.

D
Darrell Harris
12 years ago

I strongly object to the proposed plans, it will devastate the quite pleasant little village and devalue everybody homes, not to mention road safety for the children that walk down that road to catch school bus's, and road traffic which is already bad at the main road would be made worse also. It should not go ahead!!!

A
Anonymous
12 years ago

Increased HGV traffic - The junction of the site will only increase the volume of traffic at an already congested area. The commuter traffic has already been identified as a problem by the Highways Agency as they intend to perform radical changes to the existing Milton Interchange roundabout to help ease congestion from the A34 and nearby expanding Milton Park. Adding an approximate 80 slow moving HGV vehicles daily to this area would not help to enhance the accessibility of the Science Vale UK Enterprise Zone and the new housing in Didcot with its growing population.

M
Martin Woodgett
12 years ago Featured

The number of delivery lorries proposed is horrendous - and this in an area where there is already congestion, to be made even worse by other developments in the area. This monstrosity should be sites on a brown field site beside railway tracks - e.g. on part of the Power Station land.

S
Sarah Baker
12 years ago Featured

Inappropriate location, noise, light, flies, vermin and odour pollution. Goes against VWHDC own policy for Greenfield sites. Contravenes Environment Agency rules for facilities of this nature. A good idea, but not this big and this close to a residential area